Loading…
Loading…
West Virginia · Nonprofit
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY (West Virginia) is funded by 32 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $4,134,965 in grants to it, the largest being RIVER VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION ($1,779,326). 18 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 98 philanthropy nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 98 philanthropy nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2025
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
39% of COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (82% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.
$8k from 1 funders in 2025, up from $39k and 6 in 2017.
9 of 32 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 11% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 32 funders by total. Association, not causation.
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 43% of grant income and the top three 65%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 39% · 2018 56% · 2019 69% · 2020 56% · 2021 36% · 2022 44% · 2023 91% · 2024 25% · 2025 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
35% of COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 56% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY is locally rooted: 64% of its grant income comes from West Virginia funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 32 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $25k on record.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
76% of spending goes to programs.
56%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Part of a family of 2 related entities
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 32funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing