Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Harry and Helen Sands Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$145k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$954kYouth Development$111kPublic Benefit$95kHuman Services$43kHealth$28kArts & Culture$17kFood & Nutrition$17kPhilanthropy$16kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $120k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SANDSCREST FOUNDATION$120,000
OHIO RIVER VALLEY COUNCIL$15,000
YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC$2,500
WHEELING SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC$2,500
KINGS DAUGHTERS CHILD CARE CENTER$2,500
OHIO VALLEY BOXING ASSOCIATION$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $10k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $9k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $5k → 15%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS INC: $5k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $3k → 15%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS INC: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 12 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
8

Total granted

$1.2M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+6%

Still filing today

42%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    Sandscrest Foundation Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $930k · revenue +66% · 31% of their budget
  • YS
    YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC
    4× · 2019–2024 · $26k · revenue +28%
  • WS
    WHEELING SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $15k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE OHIO VALLEY
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • EW
    EASTERSEALS WEST VIRGINIA
    one grant, 2019 · $9k
  • WM
    WVU MEDICINE WHEELING HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2023 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southeastern Ohio Center for Independent Living

Provide services to people with disabilities. such services include assistance with housing, employment, transportation and recreational issues.

Human Services
2
Wray Rehabilitation & Activities Center

Providing opportunities to improve the health of our community.

3
Cincinnati Center for Autism

We support individuals with autism and their families through programming in the areas of academics, adaptive behavior, communication, and social participation.

Education
4
Easter Seals Tristate

Empowering children and adults with disabilities, military veterans, and people facing disadvantages to live full and meaningful lives.

Employment
5
Craftsbury Community Care Center

Residential care home for elderly and handicapped.

Human Services
6
Developmental Services Center of Champaign County Inc

Developmental services center (dsc) supports people with disabilities in living a rich and meaningful life.

Human Services
7
Y E S the Arc Arc of Arizona Inc

Provide services to adults with developmental disabilities.

8
The Rehabilitation Center

Provides occupational, physical, and speech therapies.

9
Tri-County Center

Provide services to individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

10
Waves Inc

Assist individuals with developmental disabilities.

Human Services
11
Easter Seals Northern Ohio Inc

Easter seals makes profound, positive differences in the lives of people with disabilities by helping them live, work and play in their community.

12
Easter Seals East Georgia Inc

Easter Seals East Georgia's mission is to provide exceptional services to ensure that people with disabilities and barriers to employment maximize their potential for employment and independence and broaden their opportunities for full…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wheeling Health Right Inc and the most unlike its peers is Easter Seal Rehabilitation Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Sandscrest Foundation Inc — $930,400 · OtherSandscrest Foundation IncOHIO RIVER VALLEY COUNCIL — $109,500 · OtherOHIO RIVER VALLEY COUNCILBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $60,000 · Other+10 more — $101,390 · Other+10 moreYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC — $26,000 · Human ServicesFAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS INC — $7,500 · Human ServicesEASTER SEAL REHABILITATION CENTER INC — $15,000 · HealthAUGUSTA LEVY LEARNING CENTER INC — $5,000 · HealthWHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC — $2,500 · HealthCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INC — $15,500 · PhilanthropyWHEELING SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC — $15,000 · Arts & CultureOGLEBAY INSTITUTE — $1,500 · Environment
Other$1,201,290Human Services$33,500Health$22,500Philanthropy$15,500Arts & Culture$15,000Environment$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSandscrest Foundation Inc — $930,400 over 8y, 31% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC — $26,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INC — $15,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWHEELING SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC — $15,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetEASTER SEAL REHABILITATION CENTER INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE KING'S DAUGHTERS CHILD CARE CENTERS INC — $10,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS INC — $7,500 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WHEELING — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAUGUSTA LEVY LEARNING CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOGLEBAY INSTITUTE — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Sandscrest Foundation Inc
  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INC
  • Who funds WHEELING SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds EASTER SEAL REHABILITATION CENTER INC
  • Who funds THE KING'S DAUGHTERS CHILD CARE CENTERS INC
  • Who funds FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS INC
  • Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WHEELING
  • Who funds AUGUSTA LEVY LEARNING CENTER INC
  • Who funds WHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC
  • Who funds OGLEBAY INSTITUTE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stamp 2001 Charitable FundWV22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stamp 2001 Charitable Fund · Albert Schenk III & Kathleen H Schenk Charitable Trust · The Driehorst Family Foundation · August J & Thelma S Hoffmann Foundation · Encova Foundation of West Virginia · Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley Inc · Helen J Prince Foundation Security National Trust Co Trustee · Chris Hess Foundation · Raymond A & Gertrude D Hyer Foundation · George W Bowers Family Charitable Trust · Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · Robinson S Parlin Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Harry and Helen Sands Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph