Loading…
· Public charity
RIVER VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION
The mission of this corporation is to improve the health and well-being of the residents of the ohio valley.
$123k
Granted FY2024
1
Grants
1
Communities
$123k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2024.
Philanthropy$1.8MHealth$80kHuman Services$51kHousing & Shelter$35kEmployment$10kEducation$10kEnvironment$8kOther$85k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
—
2020
libertycovidhousingcare
2021
covid vaccinemental
2022
mental
2023
—
2024
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 1 grant
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$122,546
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
- COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO V$122,546
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 6 repeat orgs$150k to everyone else
6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
6
14
Total granted
$1.9M
$150k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+86%
+95%
Still filing today
100%
57%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyEnvironmentEmploymentOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO V3× · 2021–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +71%
- WHWHEELING HEALTH RIGHT3× · 2019–2022 · $46k · revenue +6%
- YSYOUTH SERVICE SYSTEMS INC3× · 2020–2022 · $30k · revenue +28%
Funded once
- NCNATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCESgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +116%
- WVWEST VIRGINIA LOCAL HEALTH INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +122%
- OCOHIO COUNTY HEALTH DEPTone grant, 2021 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Westchester Institute for Human
Wihd addresses major social & health issues affecting people with disabilities & vulnerable children. wihd provides clinical & support services to individuals, families & caregivers
Health
2
Woodley Housing Corporation
To provide housing facilities and specially designed services to elderly and disabled adults.
—
3
Ohio Hills Health Services
Delivery of health care to the local community and surrounding areas
—
4
Wayne County Community Services
Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv
Community Improvement
5
Human Services Inc
Outpatient mental health, mental health residential, and homeless services.
Human Services
6
Wise & Healthy Aging
Social services - elderly/senior and disabled adults
Health
7
Waynesburg University
Provide higher education to students in undergraduate and graduate programs
Education
8
Ohio Valley Goodwill Industries
Ohio valley goodwill industries rehabilitation center, inc. is a member of a national network of goodwill associations whose primary function is to provide vocational rehabilitation, training, and employment services to individuals with…
—
9
Center for Community Resources Inc
To coordinate access to mental health, intellectual disabilities and drug and alcohol services.
Health
10
Wirt County Health Services
Provision of primary and preventive care services to the rural population of wirt and jackson counties in west virginia.
Health
11
The Walker Center for Alcoholism
Rehabilitative services for alcohol and substance abuse
Health
12
Wayside House Inc
Residential and outpatient care for women with substance abuse addictions.
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wheeling Health Right Inc and the most unlike its peers is National Church Residences. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
13/14
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Philanthropy$1,779,326Other$85,425Health$79,600Human Services$51,000Housing & Shelter$35,000Employment$10,000Education$10,000Environment$7,500
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO V ↗
- Who funds WHEELING HEALTH RIGHT ↗
- Who funds YOUTH SERVICE SYSTEMS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES ↗
- Who funds YWCA WHEELING WV ↗
- Who funds WEST VIRGINIA LOCAL HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds WLU FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NAMI OF GREATER WHEELING INC ↗
- Who funds CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds ORCHARD PARK HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds LINSLY SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds SOUP KITCHEN OF GREATER WHEELING ↗
- Who funds OGLEBAY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds INFORMATION HELPLINE - UOV ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Community Foundation for the Ohio ValleyWV26.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley · Albert Schenk III & Kathleen H · Raymond A & Gertrude D Hyer Foundation · August J & Thelma S Hoffmann Foundation · Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation · Helen J Prince Foundation · Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust · Harry and Helen Sands Charitable Trust · Stamp 2001 Charitable Fund · Stamp Charitable Fund · Francis J and Edith Jackson Founda · The Banford & Terri Exley Family
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation RIVER VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO V.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~5 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +71% since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 310908698 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO V, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 5 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 22% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to River Valley Health Foundation?
Find your warmest path to River Valley Health Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines