Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Colorado · Nonprofit

COLORADO TENNIS ASSOCIATION

COLORADO TENNIS ASSOCIATION (Colorado) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $6,436,685 to it, the largest being INTERMOUNTAIN TENNIS ASSOCIATION ($6,392,885). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$2.4M
Revenue FY2024
2
Funders on record
$6.4M
Grants received
$1.0M
Net assets
1/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 47%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($2.0M) Expenses 100 ($2.0M) Net assets 100 ($341k)2018 Revenue 106 ($2.1M) Expenses 106 ($2.1M) Net assets 110 ($376k)2019 Revenue 105 ($2.1M) Expenses 104 ($2.1M) Net assets 116 ($397k)2020 Revenue 85 ($1.7M) Expenses 85 ($1.7M) Net assets 122 ($415k)2021 Revenue 110 ($2.2M) Expenses 89 ($1.8M) Net assets 255 ($870k)2022 Revenue 105 ($2.1M) Expenses 101 ($2.0M) Net assets 284 ($968k)2023 Revenue 111 ($2.2M) Expenses 111 ($2.2M) Net assets 293 ($999k)2024 Revenue 120 ($2.4M) Expenses 121 ($2.4M) Net assets 298 ($1.0M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (120)Expenses (121)Net assets (298)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 15% · 2021 11%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$23k
17
$34k
18
$28k
19
$15k
20
$455k
21
$98k
22
$31k
23
$17k
24
5.7
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $800k → $855k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
total
funders
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2

From the IRS filings of COLORADO TENNIS ASSOCIATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.

How concentrated its funding is

COLORADO TENNIS ASSOCIATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 99% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

99%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.

Where its funders are

100% of COLORADO TENNIS ASSOCIATION's grant income comes from Colorado funders.

CO

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Colorado out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like COLORADO TENNIS ASSOCIATION

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Colorado

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

80% of spending goes to programs.

Program 80%Management 11%Fundraising 10%

Governance

19
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Colorado Youth Tennis Foundation · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for COLORADO TENNIS ASSOCIATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds COLORADO TENNIS ASSOCIATION?
COLORADO TENNIS ASSOCIATION (Colorado) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $6,436,685 to it, the largest being INTERMOUNTAIN TENNIS ASSOCIATION ($6,392,885). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does COLORADO TENNIS ASSOCIATION have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $6,436,685 in grants to COLORADO TENNIS ASSOCIATION, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of COLORADO TENNIS ASSOCIATION?
INTERMOUNTAIN TENNIS ASSOCIATION is the largest funder on record, with $6,392,885 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like COLORADO TENNIS ASSOCIATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Colorado. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. What this page cannot tell you · view filing