Skip to content

Michigan · Nonprofit

CHIPPEWA NATURE CENTER

CHIPPEWA NATURE CENTER (Michigan) receives grants from 21 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,894,937 to it, the largest being THE HERBERT H & GRACE A DOW FOUNDATION ($2,182,500). 15 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$11M
Funders on record
21
Grants received
$4.9M
Net assets
$44M
15/21 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 52%
01What it does

What Chippewa Nature Center does

Mission

The Chippewa Nature Center is a non-profit organization whose mission is to facilitate the enjoyment and understanding of our natural, historical and archaeological resources as relevant to the saginaw valley, to promote environmental awareness and to foster responsible stewardship.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Department of programs: in 2025, the Chippewa Nature Center continued to serve our mission to connect all people with nature through educational, recreational and cultural experiences. Our programming team connected with the public through our annual festivals, staff-led outdoor experiences, and indoor educational visits. We offered nature preschool and nature day camp to serve the children of our community. We partnered with schools through educational field trips at our location and presented our programs in their classrooms.

    $1,690,637 spent$783,747 earned by the program
    61% of program spending
  2. Land and facilities: our land and facilities team worked with other organizations to manage their land for reduced invasive species and native growth promotion.

    $1,010,629 spent
    36% of program spending
  3. Volunteers and outreach: the strong community support we received through volunteer opportunities made our services possible.

    $83,481 spent
    3% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $2,784,747.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($3.2M) Expenses 100 ($2.8M) Net assets 100 ($36M)2018 Revenue 107 ($3.5M) Expenses 103 ($2.9M) Net assets 89 ($32M)2019 Revenue 93 ($3.0M) Expenses 102 ($2.9M) Net assets 98 ($35M)2020 Revenue 53 ($1.7M) Expenses 97 ($2.7M) Net assets 106 ($38M)2021 Revenue 114 ($3.7M) Expenses 90 ($2.5M) Net assets 110 ($40M)2022 Revenue 141 ($4.6M) Expenses 107 ($3.0M) Net assets 97 ($35M)2023 Revenue 140 ($4.5M) Expenses 108 ($3.0M) Net assets 109 ($39M)2024 Revenue 129 ($4.2M) Expenses 114 ($3.2M) Net assets 113 ($41M)2025 Revenue 338 ($11M) Expenses 126 ($3.5M) Net assets 122 ($44M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (338)Expenses (126)Net assets (122)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $40M to $35M (−12%).

$36M
$32M
$35M
$38M
$40M
$35M
$39M
$41M
$44M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 17% · 2021 8% · 2022 5%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

10% of CHIPPEWA NATURE CENTER’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (87% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 364 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$428k
’17
$588k
’18
$135k
’19
−$987k
’20
$1.2M
’21
$1.6M
’22
$1.5M
’23
$957k
’24
$7.4M
’25
16
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed181817151515151514
Joined·+1+2+3+0+1+2+0+1
No longer listed·13501202
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 13 funders, grant income rose $36k → $2.3M.

5 of 21 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 17% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CHIPPEWA NATURE CENTER’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CHIPPEWA NATURE CENTER leans on a few funders — its largest provides 45% of grant income and the top three 79%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

45%
largest funder
79%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 85% · 2018 82% · 2019 84% · 2020 47% · 2021 54% · 2022 85% · 2023 45% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of CHIPPEWA NATURE CENTER's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 71% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

97% of CHIPPEWA NATURE CENTER's grant income comes from Michigan funders.

WI
MI
CA
VA
DE
OK

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Michigan out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $808k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

CHIPPEWA NATURE CENTER runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 210 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin68% · top quartile
Months of reserve15.5mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)16% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 210 environment nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2025

Government funding CHIPPEWA NATURE CENTER receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $154k on record.

Federal$154k
grants $154kcontracts $0
19
20
21
23
Top agencies
  • Department of Agriculture$137k
  • Department of the Interior$18k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like CHIPPEWA NATURE CENTER

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Michigan

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

79% of spending goes to programs.

Program 79%Management 16%Fundraising 5%

Governance

13
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

38%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MI

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CHIPPEWA NATURE CENTER: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CHIPPEWA NATURE CENTER?
CHIPPEWA NATURE CENTER (Michigan) receives grants from 21 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,894,937 to it, the largest being THE HERBERT H & GRACE A DOW FOUNDATION ($2,182,500). 15 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does CHIPPEWA NATURE CENTER have?
IRS filings report 21 organizations giving $4,894,937 in grants to CHIPPEWA NATURE CENTER, 15 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CHIPPEWA NATURE CENTER?
THE HERBERT H & GRACE A DOW FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $2,182,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CHIPPEWA NATURE CENTER find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Michigan. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 21 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing