Skip to content

Oregon · Nonprofit

CHILOQUIN VISIONS IN PROGRESS

CHILOQUIN VISIONS IN PROGRESS (Oregon) receives grants from 8 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,019,029 to it, the largest being The Ford Family Foundation ($456,768). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$768k
Funders on record
8
Grants received
$1.0M
Net assets
$1.1M
3/8 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 84%
01What it does

What Chiloquin Visions in Progress does

Mission

Cvip serves the greater chiloquin area community as a catalyst for ideas and projects that result in a healthy and prosperous social, economic, natural and cultural environment.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Community center the community center houses, the chiloquin branch library, the two rivers art gallery & gift shop, the klamath county corrections, full circle healing, and, of course, the office of Chiloquin Visions in Progress. It provides space for women, infants & children services, klamath alcohol & drug abuse meetings, wellbriety (native substance abuse treatment) and many other social services. It also hosts public meetings and private events. There are two spacious rooms available for rent by community memebrs for public or private events. All this keeps the place alive with reasons. Chiloquin learns after school (clas0 was started in 2004 and continues to provide chiloquin area children grades k-6 a safe, caring, enriching, learning environment after school. Two rivers art gallery features information center with all the brochures visitiors can use to find their way around the area.

    $370,860 spent
    53% of program spending
  2. Two rivers village arts - suports artists in displaying and selling their orignial artwork.

    $16,785 spent
    2% of program spending
  3. Operation of a comuunity center

    $310,232 spent
    44% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $697,877.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($105k) Expenses 100 ($158k) Net assets 100 ($1.3M)2018 Revenue 131 ($138k) Expenses 123 ($195k) Net assets 95 ($1.3M)2019 Revenue 121 ($127k) Expenses 110 ($174k) Net assets 91 ($1.2M)2020 Revenue 163 ($172k) Expenses 96 ($152k) Net assets 93 ($1.2M)2021 Revenue 602 ($633k) Expenses 117 ($185k) Net assets 123 ($1.6M)2022 Revenue 256 ($269k) Expenses 397 ($629k) Net assets 99 ($1.3M)2023 Revenue 243 ($255k) Expenses 258 ($408k) Net assets 88 ($1.2M)2024 Revenue 730 ($768k) Expenses 498 ($789k) Net assets 86 ($1.1M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (730)Expenses (498)Net assets (86)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $1.3M to $1.7M (+32%).

$1.3M
$1.3M
$1.2M
$1.3M
$1.7M
$1.3M
$1.2M
$1.2M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 46% · 2018 26% · 2019 13% · 2020 55% · 2021 29% · 2022 68% · 2023 66% · 2024 83%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

84% of CHILOQUIN VISIONS IN PROGRESS’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (62% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 12,439 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$53k
’17
−$57k
’18
−$47k
’19
$19k
’20
$447k
’21
−$360k
’22
−$152k
’23
−$21k
’24
2.5
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed101211109998
Joined·+3+1+1+2+0+0+1
No longer listed·1223002
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 3 funders, grant income fell $29k → $15k.

2 of 8 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 35% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CHILOQUIN VISIONS IN PROGRESS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CHILOQUIN VISIONS IN PROGRESS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 45% of grant income and the top three 91%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

35% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CHILOQUIN VISIONS IN PROGRESS.

45%
largest funder
91%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 51% · 2019 100% · 2020 82% · 2021 55% · 2022 65% · 2023 67% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of CHILOQUIN VISIONS IN PROGRESS's funders are still giving 2 years after their first grant; 38% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

83% of CHILOQUIN VISIONS IN PROGRESS's grant income comes from Oregon funders.

MN
OR
CO

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Oregon out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $360k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

CHILOQUIN VISIONS IN PROGRESS has grown faster than three-quarters of the 11,971 community improvement nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−3% · below the median
Months of reserve2.5mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)33% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 11,971 community improvement nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Government funding CHILOQUIN VISIONS IN PROGRESS receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $272k on record — $71k federal, $200k state.

Federal$71k
grants $71kcontracts $0
Top agencies
  • Department of Agriculture$71k
State$200k
20
24
25
Top programs
  • DISTRIBUTION TO NON-GOVERNMENTS$200k
  • INTERAGENCY LEASE PAYMENTS$200
  • FACILITIES RENT$60

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like CHILOQUIN VISIONS IN PROGRESS

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Oregon

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

88% of spending goes to programs.

Program 88%Management 11%Fundraising 0%

Governance

8
board members
100%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

OR

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CHILOQUIN VISIONS IN PROGRESS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CHILOQUIN VISIONS IN PROGRESS?
CHILOQUIN VISIONS IN PROGRESS (Oregon) receives grants from 8 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,019,029 to it, the largest being The Ford Family Foundation ($456,768). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does CHILOQUIN VISIONS IN PROGRESS have?
IRS filings report 8 organizations giving $1,019,029 in grants to CHILOQUIN VISIONS IN PROGRESS, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CHILOQUIN VISIONS IN PROGRESS?
The Ford Family Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $456,768 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CHILOQUIN VISIONS IN PROGRESS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Oregon. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Chiloquin Visions in Progress →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 8 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing