Oregon · Nonprofit
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF LINCOLN COUNTY
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF LINCOLN COUNTY (Oregon) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $306,202 to it, the largest being The Ford Family Foundation ($226,963). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF LINCOLN COUNTY runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 363 civil rights nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 363 civil rights nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Samaritan Pacific Health Serviceslocal
- Sexually Abused Children's Relief Endeavor (Sacred)portfolio match
- Tennessee Chapter of Children's Advocacyportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 70% · 2018 54% · 2019 48% · 2020 61% · 2021 69% · 2022 70% · 2023 54% · 2024 38% · 2025 57%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
75% of CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF LINCOLN COUNTY’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (97% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base held at 2 funders, grant income fell $40k → $20k.
2 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 2% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF LINCOLN COUNTY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF LINCOLN COUNTY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 74% of grant income and the top three 92%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 77% · 2018 75% · 2019 78% · 2020 80% · 2021 100% · 2022 99% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
97% of CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF LINCOLN COUNTY's grant income comes from Oregon funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $5k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 7 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Samaritan Pacific Health ServiceslocalOR · funds 11 organizations near you
- Sexually Abused Children's Relief Endeavor (Sacred)portfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Tennessee Chapter of Children's Advocacyportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Children's Advocacy Centers of Texas Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Children's Advocacy Centers of Arkansasportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Alabama Network of Children's Advocacy Centers Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Children's Advocacy Centers of Georgia Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Children's Advocacy Centers of North Carolina Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Children's Advocacy Centers of Pennsylvaniaportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Ohio Network of Children's Advocacy Centersportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Colorado Child Advocacy Allianceportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Knot Today Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF LINCOLN COUNTY
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Oregon
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
79% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
88%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF LINCOLN COUNTY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF LINCOLN COUNTY?
- CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF LINCOLN COUNTY (Oregon) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $306,202 to it, the largest being The Ford Family Foundation ($226,963). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF LINCOLN COUNTY have?
- IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $306,202 in grants to CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF LINCOLN COUNTY, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF LINCOLN COUNTY?
- The Ford Family Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $226,963 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF LINCOLN COUNTY find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Oregon. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing