Skip to content

Connecticut · Nonprofit

BIKERS AGAINST ANIMAL CRUELTY INC

BIKERS AGAINST ANIMAL CRUELTY INC (Connecticut) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $14,432 to it, the largest being NETWORK FOR GOOD ($11,299). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 84% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$37k
Funders on record
6
Grants received
$14k
Net assets
$37k
2/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 5%
01What it does

What Bikers Against Animal Cruelty Inc does

Mission

Advocate for animal welfare and positive pet ownership.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

Program

  1. Provide financial assistance to pets subject to cruelty and neglect and offer spay/neuter financial assistance. We provided financial assistance for 58 cases for the medical care of ownerless pets with abuse/neglect or needing spay/neuter services.

    $40,732 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $40,732.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2022, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2022, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20222022 Revenue 100 ($26k) Expenses 100 ($31k) Net assets 100 ($43k)2023 Revenue 86 ($22k) Expenses 71 ($22k) Net assets 134 ($58k)2024 Revenue 104 ($27k) Expenses 105 ($32k) Net assets 122 ($52k)2025 Revenue 144 ($37k) Expenses 133 ($41k) Net assets 86 ($37k)
2022202320242025
Revenue (144)Expenses (133)Net assets (86)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $52k to $37k (−29%).

$43k
$58k
$52k
$37k
2022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of BIKERS AGAINST ANIMAL CRUELTY INC’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 6,581 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.

−$5k
’22
$438
’23
−$5k
’24
−$4k
’25
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $100 → $1k.

2 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 84% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of BIKERS AGAINST ANIMAL CRUELTY INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

BIKERS AGAINST ANIMAL CRUELTY INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 78% of grant income and the top three 92%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

84% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund BIKERS AGAINST ANIMAL CRUELTY INC.

78%
largest funder
92%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 97% · 2021 67% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

84% of BIKERS AGAINST ANIMAL CRUELTY INC's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $2k that is directly attributable, 57% of it comes from funders outside Connecticut, across 3 states.

NY
CT
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’21
’23
Connecticut out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $12k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

BIKERS AGAINST ANIMAL CRUELTY INC has grown faster than three-quarters of the 3,489 animals nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−10% · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)13% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,489 animals nonprofits under $100k, FY2025

Organizations like BIKERS AGAINST ANIMAL CRUELTY INC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Connecticut

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for BIKERS AGAINST ANIMAL CRUELTY INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds BIKERS AGAINST ANIMAL CRUELTY INC?
BIKERS AGAINST ANIMAL CRUELTY INC (Connecticut) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $14,432 to it, the largest being NETWORK FOR GOOD ($11,299). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 84% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does BIKERS AGAINST ANIMAL CRUELTY INC have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $14,432 in grants to BIKERS AGAINST ANIMAL CRUELTY INC, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of BIKERS AGAINST ANIMAL CRUELTY INC?
NETWORK FOR GOOD is the largest funder on record, with $11,299 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like BIKERS AGAINST ANIMAL CRUELTY INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Connecticut. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Bikers Against Animal Cruelty →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2022–2025), and the filings of 6 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing