Loading…
· Private foundation
NORTH HAVEN ROTARY FOUNDATION INC
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$71k
Granted FY2023
65
Grants
2
Communities
$9k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 93% of NORTH HAVEN ROTARY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2021
—
2022
hannah
2023
madecommitteewarm coatloveiyf machousingfellowship place
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2023 · 65 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$260k
Total assets
Largest grants
- HOMES FOR HEROS$8,635
- SCHUPP LILY DUKE MEDICAL SCHOOL$3,000
- POSTPARTUM SUPPORT INTERNATIONAL$3,000
- FELLOWSHIP PLACE$2,000
- UKRAINE FAMILY FUND$2,000
- JOSHUA ZUNIGA$1,500
- BRENDAN ZIAKS$1,500
- IYF MAC FOUNDATION$1,500
- FRIENDS COMMITTEE FOR CHILDREN$1,500
- ST JOHN CHURCH$1,500
- ST JUDE- CHILDREN RESEACH HOSPITAL$1,500
- BOY & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INC$1,100
- PEACE CEDNTER OF CT$1,000
- HOME TOWN FOUNDATION$1,000
- CAMILLE DI GIOIA$1,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
None of your grants could be placed against cost of living need for this view.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Newtown Housing for the Elderly Inc
Newtown Housing for the Elderly, Inc. is a Non-Profit Organization established to provide low cost housing for the elderly aged 62 or older, and for handicapped or disabled persons.
Housing & Shelter
2
Connecticut Housing Coalition Inc
To develop and advocate public policies to allow for decent and affordable housing in ct.
—
3
Neighborhood Housing Services
Affordable housing, rehabilitation services and housing counseling
Housing & Shelter
4
House of Hope Inc
To provide licensed substance use disorder and mental health disorder treatment.
Health
5
Community Residences Inc
Housing and programs for persons with intellectual disabilities.
Human Services
6
The Connecticut Institute for the
Oak hill operates group homes which house both adults and adolescent residents. oak hill provides residential, educational, and enrichment services that empower individuals with disabilities to live full, independent lives.
Human Services
7
Newbridge Place
Newbridge Place provideds 24 hour care and long-term housing for persons and veterans living with chronic mental illness and whose independent functioning is impaired.
Housing & Shelter
8
Magnificat Houses Inc
Magnificat Houses, Inc. offers a welcoming community where those needing housing, food and mental health programs can grow in stability, productivity and independence.
Health
9
Tarry House Inc
Tarry House operates group homes to provide shelter, food and,services to adults with severe mental disorders
Unclassified
10
Horace Bushnell Congregate Homes Inc
Providing low income elderly congregate housing in hartford, ct.
—
11
Extended Housing Inc
support individuals with severe and persistent mental illness to live as independently as possible by creating, developing & sustaining safe and affordable housing options.
Human Services
12
New Neighborhoods Inc
New neighborhoods, inc.'s purpose is to develop, redevelop, own and manage quality housing for low and moderate income persons and families and to work to assist in the planning, re-planning, development and improvement of low and moderate…
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fellowship Place Inc and the most unlike its peers is Yale New Haven Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
14/14
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$89,792Health$2,900Housing & Shelter$1,750Animals$1,000Food & Nutrition$1,000Arts & Culture$500
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Ion Bank Foundation IncCT18× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Ion Bank Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater New · Newalliance Foundation Inc · Ethel & Abe Lapides Foundation Inc · Town Fair Tire Foundation Inc · The Maximilian E and Marion O Hoffman · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation NORTH HAVEN ROTARY FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
- Columbus House Inc — 87% of income from government
- Fellowship Place Inc — 56% of income from government
- New Reach Inc — 51% of income from government
- Eli Whitney Museum Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BIKERS AGAINST ANIMAL CRUELTY INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
3 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 261169679 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on BIKERS AGAINST ANIMAL CRUELTY INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 5% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to North Haven Rotary Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to North Haven Rotary Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines