Skip to content

Florida · Private foundation

Richard Lichter Charity for Dogs

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$474k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
4
Grants FY2024
5
Organizations funded FY2023
20%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

84% of Richard Lichter Charity for Dogs’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’17
2
’18
3
’19
3
’20
3
’21
4
’22
5
’23
2
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2024
$53,442
Largest grant, FY2024
$400,000
Organizations funded a year
3 to 8
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
2
Total assets, FY2024
$5.7M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 20% of the organizations Richard Lichter Charity for Dogs funded were first-time grantees, receiving 2% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
AnimalsEducationCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving3$74k33%
FY20235$87k20%
FY20224$33k25%
FY20214$56k25%
FY20208$81k75%
FY20194$6k50%
FY20183$29k67%
FY20175$309kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.5MAnimals$613kHuman Services$5k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Plus 9 recipients with no EIN on record ($136k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Richard Lichter Charity for Dogs supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: $307,987 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetCornell University: $66,602 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe University of Florida Foundation Inc: $58,567 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMorris Animal Foundation: $52,256 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDelaware County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: $47,700 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetKristi House Inc: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFriends of Miami Animals Foundation Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBideawee Inc: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPaws 4 You Rescue Inc: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC10.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Richard Lichter Charity for Dogs with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Richard Lichter Charity for Dogs?

Find your warmest path to Richard Lichter Charity for Dogs through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Richard Lichter Charity for Dogs

How much does Richard Lichter Charity for Dogs give?
Richard Lichter Charity for Dogs reported 4 grants totaling $473,866 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 8 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Richard Lichter Charity for Dogs fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Education (80%), Animals (20%), Human Services (0%).
Who are Richard Lichter Charity for Dogs's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals ($308k), Cornell University ($67k), The University of Florida Foundation Inc ($59k).
Does Richard Lichter Charity for Dogs fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 20% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Richard Lichter Charity for Dogs accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Richard Lichter Charity for Dogs?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Network for Good, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Richard Lichter Charity for Dogs based?
Richard Lichter Charity for Dogs is based in FL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Richard Lichter Charity for Dogs’ filings →

More from the funding graph