New Jersey · Nonprofit
BETTER FUTURE FOR ISRAEL
BETTER FUTURE FOR ISRAEL (New Jersey) receives grants from 22 organizations whose IRS filings report $889,154 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($192,778). 15 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 68% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
Against its field
BETTER FUTURE FOR ISRAEL has grown faster than three-quarters of the 7,105 philanthropy nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 7,105 philanthropy nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Nash Family Foundationshared funders
- The Kressel Family Foundationportfolio match
- Joseph M Levine Foundationportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
100% of BETTER FUTURE FOR ISRAEL’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (87% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2021 → 2023: the base broadened from 6 funders to 12 funders, grant income rose $67k → $296k.
8 of 22 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 68% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of BETTER FUTURE FOR ISRAEL’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
BETTER FUTURE FOR ISRAEL has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 22% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left
68% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund BETTER FUTURE FOR ISRAEL.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2021 48% · 2022 44% · 2023 40% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
68% of BETTER FUTURE FOR ISRAEL's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $283k that is directly attributable, 86% of it comes from funders outside New Jersey, across 5 states.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $606k arriving through sponsors registered in 8 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 22 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Nash Family Foundationshared fundersNY · backs 47 organizations that share your funders
- The Kressel Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Joseph M Levine Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Lovell Family Ltdportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Friedman Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Helping Israel Fundportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Leonard and Diane Sherman Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Underground Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Goodtreegordon Charitable Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Kathryn Ames Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Leo Nevas Family Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Steve and Janice Hefter Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like BETTER FUTURE FOR ISRAEL
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In New Jersey
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
85% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
98%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for BETTER FUTURE FOR ISRAEL: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds BETTER FUTURE FOR ISRAEL?
- BETTER FUTURE FOR ISRAEL (New Jersey) receives grants from 22 organizations whose IRS filings report $889,154 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($192,778). 15 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 68% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does BETTER FUTURE FOR ISRAEL have?
- IRS filings report 22 organizations giving $889,154 in grants to BETTER FUTURE FOR ISRAEL, 15 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of BETTER FUTURE FOR ISRAEL?
- FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $192,778 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like BETTER FUTURE FOR ISRAEL find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New Jersey. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 22funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing