Loading…
Loading…
Pennsylvania · Nonprofit
BEN FRANKLIN TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS NE PA (Pennsylvania) is funded by 2 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $15,000 in grants to it, the largest being Berks County Community Foundation Inc ($10,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
BEN FRANKLIN TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS NE PA is better cushioned than half of the 3,884 community improvement nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,884 community improvement nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2023
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
68% of BEN FRANKLIN TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS NE PA’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (60% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.
2 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of BEN FRANKLIN TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS NE PA’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
BEN FRANKLIN TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS NE PA leans on a few funders — its largest provides 67% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
BEN FRANKLIN TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS NE PA is locally rooted: 100% of its grant income comes from Pennsylvania funders.
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
84% of spending goes to programs.
93%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Part of a family of 2 related entities
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2018–2023), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing