How much did FUZEHUB INC grant in FY2024?

FUZEHUB INC reported 45 grants totaling $1,683,503 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

FUZEHUB INC

Fuzehub works to better connect new york's small and mid-sized manufacturing companies to the resources, programs and expertise they need for technology commercialization, innovative solutions and business growth.

$1.7M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$115k

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 44% of FUZEHUB INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 45 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k4 grants · $29k
$10k–50k30 grants · $771k
$50k–250k11 grants · $872k

$30,000

Median grant

States reached

$4.3M

Total assets

Largest grants

CENTRAL NEW YORK TECH$115,000
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$97,315
UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO$93,214
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER$87,840
BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY$79,311
UNIVERSITY OF ALBANY (RESEARCH FOUNDATION STATE UNIV NY)$78,930
ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$72,406
DOWNSTATE TECH CTR$67,859
TECH VALLEY CTR GRAVITY (UNCAGED INNOVATIONS)$61,313
SOUTH TIER HIGH TECH INCUBATOR$60,000
ITAC (NYC INDUSTRIAL & TECH)(COHESIVE ROBOTICS)$58,453
SUNY COLLEGE MEDICINE (RESEARCH FOUNDATION STATE UNIV NY)$45,000
CITEC (STRUCTURAL BIOCOMPOSITES)$41,002
ASHLAWN ENERGY$40,000
MANUF&TECH ENTERPRISE CTR (MTEC) HUDSON VALLEY TECH CTR (KEGR)$40,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 10%. 94% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$6.7M · 47 repeat orgs$2.4M to everyone else

47 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 30 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$6.7M

$1.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%

+21%

Still filing today

47%

11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $577k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationCommunity ImprovementSocial ScienceHealthEmploymentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

UO
UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO
8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +56%
RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE
7× · 2017–2024 · $756k · revenue +13%
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
8× · 2017–2024 · $508k · revenue +39%

Funded once

FT
FARM TO FLAME ENERGY
one grant, 2023 · $135k
SD
SPIRO DEVICES LLC
one grant, 2020 · $103k
PV
PRECISION VALVE & AUTOMATION INC
one grant, 2020 · $103k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

New York Institute of Technology

We are committed to educating the next generation of leaders and inspiring innovation. (see sch o)

Education

New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes.

Education

New York Center for Research Economic

The new york center for research, economic advancement, technology, engineering and science corporation (ny creates) formed for the purpose of advancing scientific research, education and economic development within new york state.…

Science & Tech

Long Island University

Provide excellence and access in education to those who seek to expand their knowledge. see sch o.

—

New York Academy of Sciences

To advance scientific knowledge and to increase the number of scientifically informed individuals.

—

Technology Club of Syracuse

—

Niagara University

Niagara university educates its students and enriches their lives though programs in the liberal arts and through career preparation, informed by the catholic and vincentian traditions.

Education

St John's University New York

St. john's university is a catholic, vincentian, metropolitan, and global institution of higher education.

Education

Rit Global Delivery Corporation

Provide administrative and other support services to academic programs sponsored by rochester institute of technology both in the united states and abroad.

Education

New York Water Environment

To serve the best interests of the public by promoting sustainable clean water quality management through science, education, and training.

Environment

The Rockefeller University

A world-renowned center for research and graduate education.

Education

Excell Partners Inc

To provide financial support, education, management support and networking connections to technology-based start-up companies emerging from the communities, universities and research centers across upstate new york.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nextcorps Inc and the most unlike its peers is University of Rochester. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/105

the rest of the field

5,468/65,037

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

33 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

32/33

Grantees still filing

24/33

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Education$4,333,255Other$4,026,988Social Science$317,099Community Improvement$266,279Health$99,986Employment$43,964Arts & Culture$10,044

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New York City Industrial TechnologyNY18.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New York City Industrial Technology · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation FUZEHUB INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: TECH VALLEY CTR GRAVITY (UNCAGED INNOVATIONS).

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +68% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 900922584 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on TECH VALLEY CTR GRAVITY (UNCAGED INNOVATIONS), cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 13% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Fuzehub Inc?

Find your warmest path to Fuzehub Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

FUZEHUB INC

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

33 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Fuzehub Inc?

More from the funding graph

FUZEHUB INC

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

33 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Fuzehub Inc?

More from the funding graph