Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Charitable trust

The Harry R Halloran Jr Charitable Trust

To make charitable grants and pursue charitable activities that support the mission of the philadelphia foundation.

$7.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
44
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$3.0M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Philanthropy$14MCommunity Improvement$6.2MHuman Services$3.0MEducation$1.6MYouth Development$1.5MArts & Culture$1.4MInternational$743kReligion$570kOther$0
02FY2024 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $141k
  • $50k–250k31 grants · $2.5M
  • $250k+8 grants · $5.2M
$75,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE VISIONS FUND AT THE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION$3,000,000
WATSON INSTITUTE$493,548
BRADFORD AREA ALLIANCE$400,000
UNITED WAY OF THE BRADFORD AREA$300,000
MCKEAN COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$250,000
REALIZE IMPACT$250,000
IMPACTASSETS INC$250,000
KENSINGTON CORRIDOR TRUST$250,000
THE NORTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA REGIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION$200,000
THE PEACE STUDIO$150,000
AMALGAMATED FOUNDATION$150,000
IMPACTPHL$150,000
BRADFORD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER$100,000
PHILADELPHIA AREA COOPERATIVE ALLIANCE$100,000
EISENHOWER EXCHANGE FELLOWSHIPS INC$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $3.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 16% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GUADALUPE CENTER INC: $25k → 10%REALIZE IMPACT: $100k → 10%CREATIVE CAPITAL: $100k → 17%GUADALUPE CENTER INC: $25k → 10%HALLORAN FOUNDATION: $655k → 7%GUADALUPE CENTER INC: $15k → 10%HALLORAN FOUNDATION: $610k → 7%GUADALUPE CENTER INC: $15k → 10%HALLORAN FOUNDATION: $475k → 7%HALLORAN FOUNDATION: $450k → 7%HALLORAN FOUNDATION: $288k → 7%UNTOURS FOUNDATION: $100k → 10%HALLORAN FOUNDATION: $241k → 7%THE FRIENDSHIP TABLE: $55k → 15%REALIZE IMPACT: $250k → 17%UNTOURS FOUNDATION INC: $50k → 10%HAVERFORD AREA YMCA: $5k → 10%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $25k → 22%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $25k → 22%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $10k → 22%WOMEN IN TRANSITION: $10k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
IL
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
TN
DC
AL
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 25% of The Harry R Halloran Jr Charitable Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 68% of the giving stays in PA; read by stated purpose it is 54% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Harry R Halloran Jr Charitable Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.7% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$21M · 35 repeat orgs$4.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

35 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
39

Total granted

$21M
$2.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+20%

Still filing today

97%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HALLORAN FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2022 · $2.7M · revenue +17% · 71% of their budget
  • BA
    BRADFORD AREA ALLIANCE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +638% · 82% of their budget
  • WI
    Watson Institute
    3× · 2021–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +241%

Funded once

  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    one grant, 2022 · $700k · revenue +11%
  • FS
    First Step Staffing Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue -13%
  • BL
    B LAB COMPANY
    one grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue +20%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation

Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.

Community Improvement
2
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
3
Greater Philadelphia Tourism Marketing Corporation

Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.

Community Improvement
4
Global Impact Investing Network Inc

The global impact investing network, inc. is dedicated to increasing the scale and effectiveness of impact investing to solve systemic problems facing people and the planet. impact investments are investments made into companies,…

Philanthropy
5
Activate Global Inc

Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…

Environment
6
Pact Institute

Pact institute works to achieve strategic objectives that improve the lives of people around the world who are poor and marginalized through innovation, the exploration of new approaches and partnerships, and funding diversification. it is…

—
7
Co-Impact Philanthropic Funds Inc

Philanthropic collaborative focused on improving lives through just & inclusive systems change.

Philanthropy
8
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
9
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
10
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
11
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
12
Pidc Development Management Corporation

Pidc dmc administers and coordinates various development projects for the city and other not-for-profit entities.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Transform Finance Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Impact Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity FoundationsUnited Way AffiliatesEnvironmental Conservation …Community Arts CentersYouth Development ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Health Access Advocacy and …Affordable Housing Developm…Addiction Recovery ServicesJewish Community Organizati…Domestic Violence ServicesPregnancy Support ServicesFood Banks and PantriesYmca Youth DevelopmentCommunity Food PantriesPublic Library OperationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%11%<5yr13%11%5–10yr19%26%10–20yr17%14%20–35yr15%19%35–55yr17%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%4%<5yr13%7%5–10yr19%62%10–20yr17%16%20–35yr15%5%35–55yr17%6%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.9%1/105
the rest of the field
9%
7,129/78,057

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

98 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 98 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

17
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
97/98
Grantees still filing
61/98
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE VISIONS FUND AT THE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $8,000,000 · PhilanthropyTHE VISIONS FUND AT THE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATIONIMPACTASSETSINC — $3,730,000 · PhilanthropyIMPACTASSETSINCCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NORTHERN ALLEGHENIES — $1,150,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NORTHERN ALLEGHENIES+14 more — $1,546,700 · Philanthropy+14 moreTHE HALLORAN FOUNDATION — $2,718,500 · Human ServicesTHE HALLORAN …Realize Impact — $550,000 · Human ServicesRealize Impac…UNTOURS FOUNDATION — $150,000 · Human Services+6 more — $310,000 · Human Services+6 moreBRADFORD AREA ALLIANCE — $2,580,000 · HealthBRADFORD …OLEAN GENERAL HOSPITAL — $100,000 · Health+2 more — $60,000 · HealthKENSINGTON CORRIDOR TRUST — $750,000 · Community ImprovementFOUNDATION FOR APPRECIATIVE INQUIRY — $246,000 · Community ImprovementTHE ENTERPRISE CENTER — $213,000 · Community ImprovementNORTH CENTRAL PA REGIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION — $200,000 · Community ImprovementMOM YOUR BUSINESS — $125,000 · Community ImprovementBEN FRANKLIN TECHNOLOGY PTRS OF SE PA — $75,000 · Community Improvement+4 more — $200,000 · Community ImprovementUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $700,000 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $290,000 · EducationWILLIAM TRIPPLEY YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FTD — $225,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $130,000 · EducationCODED BY — $75,000 · Education+7 more — $202,000 · EducationMYRIAD USA INC — $450,000 · InternationalTHE ENLIGHTENED WORLD FOUNDATION — $445,000 · InternationalEisenhower Exchange Fellowships Incorporated — $350,000 · InternationalUnlocking Communities Inc — $125,000 · InternationalPRO MUJER INC — $60,000 · International+6 more — $145,000 · InternationalWatson Institute — $1,038,187 · Youth DevelopmentLANGUAGES OF MONEY INSTITUTE INCORPORATED — $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentOAKLAND NATIVES GIVE BACK FUND INC — $75,000 · Youth DevelopmentMAKING A CHANGE GROUP — $50,000 · Youth Development+1 more — $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE PEACE STUDIO — $400,000 · OtherTHE PEACE STUD…FREEDMENS ART ALLIANCE INC — $150,000 · OtherBeneficial Returns — $255,000 · OtherBeneficial Ret…IMPACTPHL INC — $460,000 · OtherIMPACTPHL INCB LAB COMPANY — $200,000 · OtherPHILADELPHIA AREA COOPERATIVE ALLIANCE — $350,000 · OtherPHILADELPHIA A…First Step Staffing Inc — $200,000 · OtherIMPACT SERVICES CORPORATION — $150,000 · OtherCalCef Innovations — $175,000 · Other+29 more — $1,714,700 · Other+29 more
Philanthropy$14,426,700Human Services$3,728,500Health$2,740,000Community Improvement$1,809,000Education$1,622,000International$1,575,000Youth Development$1,303,187Other$4,054,700

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE VISIONS FUND AT THE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $8,000,000 over 2y, 97% of budgetIMPACTASSETSINC — $3,730,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE HALLORAN FOUNDATION — $2,718,500 over 5y, 71% of budgetBRADFORD AREA ALLIANCE — $2,580,000 over 5y, 82% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NORTHERN ALLEGHENIES — $1,150,000 over 2y, 28% of budgetWatson Institute — $1,038,187 over 3y, 24% of budgetKENSINGTON CORRIDOR TRUST — $750,000 over 3y, 42% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $700,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRealize Impact — $550,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetIMPACTPHL INC — $460,000 over 4y, 31% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC — $450,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ENLIGHTENED WORLD FOUNDATION — $445,000 over 4y, 100% of budgetTHE PEACE STUDIO — $400,000 over 4y, 27% of budgetEisenhower Exchange Fellowships Incorporated — $350,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetPHILADELPHIA AREA COOPERATIVE ALLIANCE — $350,000 over 3y, 42% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $304,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE BRADFORD AREA INC — $300,000 over 1y, 79% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $290,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOSEPH FUND INC — $250,000 over 3y, 29% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR APPRECIATIVE INQUIRY — $246,000 over 2y, 100% of budgetWILLIAM TRIPPLEY YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FTD — $225,000 over 3y, 61% of budgetTHE ENTERPRISE CENTER — $213,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetFirst Step Staffing Inc — $200,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetB LAB COMPANY — $200,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNORTH CENTRAL PA REGIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION — $200,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetCalCef Innovations — $175,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetFREEDMENS ART ALLIANCE INC — $150,000 over 2y, 99% of budgetUNTOURS FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc — $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACT SERVICES CORPORATION — $150,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC — $132,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $130,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnlocking Communities Inc — $125,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetMOM YOUR BUSINESS — $125,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BRADFORD — $120,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetTHE HONEYWELL FOUNDATION INC — $120,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION — $110,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFAITH CRUSADES MINISTRIES — $100,000 over 1y, 10.0% of budgetLANGUAGES OF MONEY INSTITUTE INCORPORATED — $100,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetBottle Underground Inc — $100,000 over 2y, 39% of budgetCREATIVE CAPITAL FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetOLEAN GENERAL HOSPITAL — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCULTURETRUST GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $100,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetMANN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS — $100,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $90,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGuadalupe Center Inc — $80,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetOAKLAND NATIVES GIVE BACK FUND INC — $75,000 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetVILCAP INC — $75,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia Foun…ImpactassetsincThe William Penn Foun…The Patricia Kind Fam…Surdna Foundation IncAmalgamated Charitabl…Silicon Valley Commun…Tides FoundationThe William & Flora H…Independence Foundati…The Barra Foundation …Wsfs Cares Foundation
The Philadelphia FoundationPA26.2× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Impactassetsinc · The William Penn Foundation · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · Surdna Foundation Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Independence Foundation · The Barra Foundation Inc · Wsfs Cares Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Harry R Halloran Jr Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Guadalupe Center Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
30report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Harry R Halloran Jr Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to The Harry R Halloran Jr Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 106 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home