Skip to content

Montana · Community foundation

Red Lodge Area Community Foundation

The RED LODGE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION serves our community through connecting people and building community by catalyzing change and leveraging resources to build a strong, vibrant, resilient, inclusive community. As a neutral convener, we serve through grantmaking, community leadership, and philanthropic services.

$913k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
27
Itemized grants FY2025
26
Organizations funded FY2024
15%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$591k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$14,845
Largest grant, FY2025
$85,131
Organizations funded a year
12 to 30
FY2017 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$5.6M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 15% of the organizations Red Lodge Area Community Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 13% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’23’24
AnimalsPhilanthropyScience & TechEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving26$591k35%
FY202426$343k15%
FY202330$881k50%
FY202118$684k22%
FY202015$230k13%
FY201918$286k39%
FY201813$442k15%
FY201712$162kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Public Benefit$503kHousing & Shelter$456kPublic Safety & Disaster$315kArts & Culture$263kAnimals$254kYouth Development$247kHuman Services$190kPhilanthropy$166kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 26 grantees
All grantees of Red Lodge Area Community Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Helena Area Habitat for Humanity$456,319123%
Domestic and Sexual Violence Services$244,8349n/a
Yellowstone Wildlife Sanctuary$177,84397%
Boys and Girls Club of Red Lodge and the Beartooth Front Inc$165,870814%
Carbon County Historical Society$127,975918%
Buses Of Yellowstone Preservation Trust Incorporated$123,452623%
Beartooth Humane Alliance$109,730713%
Beartooth Billings Clinic Foundation$102,11695%
Carbon County Community Food Bank$90,845912%
Beartooth Trails$90,441920%
Messiah Lutheran Church$89,0432n/a
Absaroka Beartooth Wilderness Foundation$82,32496%
Hope Ranch of Montana$79,56083%
RED LODGE FIRE RESCUE FOUNDATION a Montana Nonprofit Public Benefit Corp$69,25966%
Yellowstone Bighorn Research Association$51,7291n/a
Carbon County Arts Guild$48,96168%
Bighorn Basin Paleotological Institute$33,11042%
Operation Second Chance Inc$26,06531%
Jane Ferguson Wilderness Adventure$25,9003n/a
Red Lodge Music Festival Inc$23,06135%
Meadowlark Childrens Center$22,0801n/a
School of the Beartooths$20,51343%
Boys & Girls Club of Carbon County$19,8611n/a
Red Lodge Public Schools Foundation Inc$14,280237%
Palisades Counseling Services$6,8231n/a
Red Lodge Volunteer Firefighter Association$5,0851n/a

Plus 29 recipients with no EIN on record ($1.3M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Red Lodge Area Community Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 18 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHelena Area Habitat for Humanity: $456,319 over 1y, 23% of budgetYellowstone Wildlife Sanctuary: $177,843 over 9y, 7.2% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Red Lodge and the Beartooth Front Inc: $165,870 over 8y, 14% of budgetCarbon County Historical Society: $127,975 over 9y, 18% of budgetBuses Of Yellowstone Preservation Trust Incorporated: $123,452 over 6y, 23% of budgetBeartooth Humane Alliance: $109,730 over 7y, 13% of budgetBeartooth Billings Clinic Foundation: $102,116 over 9y, 5.1% of budgetCarbon County Community Food Bank: $90,845 over 9y, 12% of budgetBeartooth Trails: $90,441 over 9y, 20% of budgetAbsaroka Beartooth Wilderness Foundation: $82,324 over 9y, 6.5% of budgetHope Ranch of Montana: $79,560 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetRED LODGE FIRE RESCUE FOUNDATION a Montana Nonprofit Public Benefit Corp: $69,259 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetCarbon County Arts Guild: $48,961 over 6y, 7.7% of budgetBighorn Basin Paleotological Institute: $33,110 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetOperation Second Chance Inc: $26,065 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetRed Lodge Music Festival Inc: $23,061 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetSchool of the Beartooths: $20,513 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetRed Lodge Public Schools Foundation Inc: $14,280 over 2y, 37% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 18.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Op & We Edwards Foundation IncMT17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Op & We Edwards Foundation Inc · The Sidney E Frank Foundation · Montana Community Foundation Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Red Lodge Area Community Foundation with peer funders

About Red Lodge Area Community Foundation

How much does Red Lodge Area Community Foundation give?
Red Lodge Area Community Foundation reported 27 itemized grants totaling $590,545, out of $913,232 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 12 and 30 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2024.
What does Red Lodge Area Community Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Public Benefit (17%), Housing & Shelter (15%), Public Safety & Disaster (10%).
Who are Red Lodge Area Community Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Helena Area Habitat for Humanity ($456k), Domestic and Sexual Violence Services ($245k), Yellowstone Wildlife Sanctuary ($178k).
Does Red Lodge Area Community Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 15% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Red Lodge Area Community Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Op & We Edwards Foundation Inc, The Sidney E Frank Foundation, Montana Community Foundation Inc.
Where is Red Lodge Area Community Foundation based?
Red Lodge Area Community Foundation is based in MT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Red Lodge Area’s filings →

More from the funding graph