Loading…
Loading…
Louisiana · Nonprofit
ACADIANA CONCERN FOR AIDS RELIEF (Louisiana) is funded by 3 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $35,000 in grants to it, the largest being AIDS UNITED ($35,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
ACADIANA CONCERN FOR AIDS RELIEF has grown faster than half of the 3,322 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,322 health nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
0% of ACADIANA CONCERN FOR AIDS RELIEF’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (7% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
$0 from 1 funders in 2024, up from $35k and 2 in 2017.
From the IRS filings of ACADIANA CONCERN FOR AIDS RELIEF’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 1 of 3 funders by total. Association, not causation.
ACADIANA CONCERN FOR AIDS RELIEF draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Louisiana — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 1 states in all.
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $12.0M on record.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
90% of spending goes to programs.
99%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing