Loading…
· Public charity
OUR LADY OF LOURDES REGIONAL MEDICAL
To provide for the care of the ill, injured, or disabled persons and to provide for research, education, and the enhancement of those in the community.
$472k
Granted FY2023
4
Grants
1
Communities
$65k
Largest
01What you fund
0166% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2023.
Education$1.2MRecreation & Sports$1.0MHuman Services$350kPhilanthropy$194kHealth$79kOther$1.5M
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
goodgivingdonorsentitiespositioned itselfitself toolacadiana
2020
cancerensure everyonepartadvocacyhealth
2021
lafayettegivingdonorsentitiespositioned itselfitself toolacadiana
2022
—
2023
health
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2023 · 4 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
$29,700
Median grant
1
States reached
$598M
Total assets
Largest grants
- UNITED WAY OF ACADIANA$65,000
- AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$29,700
- FRANCISCAN MISSIONARIES OF OUR LADY UNIVERSITY$15,000
- BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF ACADIANA$15,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 16%. 98% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
39%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 9 repeat orgs$2.7M to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against -8% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
9
9
Total granted
$1.7M
$2.6M
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+14%
-8%
Still filing today
100%
44%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
EducationHealthPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- 2232-HELP2× · 2018–2021 · $210k · revenue +56%
- BCBEACON COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS3× · 2019–2021 · $126k · revenue +6083%
- OAOne Acadiana Inc (FKA Greater Lafayette Chamber)3× · 2018–2021 · $114k · revenue +8%
Funded once
- STST THOMAS MORE CATHOLIC SCHOOLone grant, 2022 · $1.0M
- LCLAFAYETTE CENTRAL PARK INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue +151% · 58% of their budget
- ARACADIANA REGIONAL COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS AND HOone grant, 2020 · $350k · revenue -53% · 43% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Louisiana Alliance for Nonprofits
Louisiana alliance for nonprofits is a statewide organization that advocates for the nonprofit community and strengthens the effectiveness of those committed to improving louisiana.
Philanthropy
2
Aia Louisiana
To promote architecture. aia louisiana empowers its members to improve communities through the architecture profession.
—
3
Louisiana Primary Care Association Inc
The Louisiana Primary Care Association, Inc. works to promote community based health services through advocacy, education, public awareness and leveraging resources.
Health
4
Lsu Alumni Association
The mission is to protect, promote, and foster the welfare of louisiana state university and to create and nurture mutually beneficial relationships between the university and its alumni and friends. the association, using the talents and…
—
5
Acadiana Legal Service Corporation
Acadiana legal service corporation (alsc) is a non-profit organization, funded primarily by the legal services corporation (lsc) and the louisiana bar foundation (lbf), to provide free civil legal services to our marginalized client…
Crime & Legal
6
Louisiana State Bar Association
The mission of the louisiana state bar association is to assist its members in the practice of law, assure access to and aid in the administration of justice, assist the supreme court in the regulation of the practice of law, uphold the…
—
7
Louisiana Association of Broadcasters
—
8
American Gas Association
American gas association (the association) is an advocate for natural gas utility companies and their customers. the association helps natural gas utilities achieve operational excellence in the safe, reliable and efficient delivery of…
—
9
Central Louisiana Chamber of Commerce
The mission of the Central Louisiana Chamber of Commerce is: to promote economic growth for central Louisiana and its citizens; to serve as a business advocate for our members; and to foster a business climate that supports business and…
—
10
Louisiana Hospital Association
To support members through advocacy, education, and services.
—
11
Acadiana Concern for Aids Relief
Address the issues associated with the hiv/aids pandemic and provide education and services for hiv prevention and care for those living with and affected by hiv/aids
Health
12
Livingston Parish
The mission of the livingston parish chamber of commerce is to serve business, enhance community and advance the economy in livingston parish
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Acadiana Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$1,472,950Education$1,235,971Recreation & Sports$1,000,000Human Services$350,000Philanthropy$193,500Health$79,300
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LAFAYETTE CENTRAL PARK INC ↗
- Who funds UL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ACADIANA REGIONAL COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS AND HO ↗
- Who funds 232-HELP ↗
- Who funds BEACON COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ACADIANA ↗
- Who funds One Acadiana Inc (FKA Greater Lafayette Chamber) ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF ACADIANA ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FRANCISCAN MISSIONARIES OF OUR LADY UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF ACADIANA ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA OPEN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Community Foundation of AcadianaLA32.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Acadiana · William C Schumacher Family Foundation · Pinhook Foundation Inc · Lafayette General Health System Inc · Zuschlag Family Foundation Co Richard E Zuschlag Trustee · Haynie Family Foundation · United Way of Acadiana Inc · Florence Mauboules Charitable Trust · Blue Cross & Blue Shield Of · Shell USA Company Foundation · James D Moncus Family Foundation · Love Our Schools
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation OUR LADY OF LOURDES REGIONAL MEDICAL funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: LAFAYETTE CENTRAL PARK INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~16 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.5× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 462552778 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on LAFAYETTE CENTRAL PARK INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 16 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 58% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical?
Find your warmest path to Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines