· Public charity
General Health System
GENERAL HEALTH SYSTEM's (ghs) primary exempt purpose is to provide efficient health care services by providing centralized management, governance and administrative services to related tax-exempt healthcare provider organizations.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $275,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $303,325 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $28,325 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $13k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $263k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BATON ROUGE HEALTH DISTRICT | $150,000 |
| BATON ROUGE AREA CHAMBER | $62,500 |
| FORE KIDS FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH | $5,000 |
| GONZALES AREA FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| BATON ROUGE AREA FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BRBATON ROUGE HEALTH DISTRICT6× · 2017–2024 · $915k · revenue +19% · 26% of their budget
- BRBATON ROUGE AREA CHAMBER7× · 2017–2024 · $417k · revenue +34%
- HMHOPE MINISTRIES OF BATON ROUGE5× · 2018–2023 · $160k · revenue +56%
Funded once
- BRBATON ROUGE GREEN ASSOCIATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $38k · revenue +55%
- TOTOWN OF LIVINGSTONone grant, 2023 · $15k
- CACAPITAL AREA UNITED WAYone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide high quality comprehensive health care services for the under-served population of east baton rouge parish and the surrounding areas regardless of ability to pay.
To develop a coordinated cancer research and educational program that will optimize discovery and development of innovative cancer therapies; lead to innovative clinial treatment programs offering new opportunities for early detection,…
To improve opportunities for cancer research in Louisiana and enhance educational efforts regarding prevention and control over cancer.
Drive solutions to common issues with an emphasis on workforce development and safety performance.
The mission of the Central Louisiana Chamber of Commerce is: to promote economic growth for central Louisiana and its citizens; to serve as a business advocate for our members; and to foster a business climate that supports business and…
Our mission is to feed the hungry in baton rouge and the surrounding parishes by providing food and educational outreach through faith-based and other community partners.
To strengthen, promote, and build the capacity of louisiana's nonprofit sector through education, advocacy, and member services.
Rendering health care services in rural areas, mainly to indigent care patients
To provide high quality healthcare to the baton rouge area, regardless of patient race, creed, sex, national origin, age, or ability to pay and to promote the overall health of the community via wellness programs and medical education…
The mission of the foundation is to inspire donors to invest in the lsu health sciences center - new orleans ("hsc-no") and its future, to properly steward those contributions, and to help meet the ever evolving needs of the lsuhsc-no by…
To assist in improving healthcare in Beauregard Parish, Louisiana.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baton Rouge Health District and the most unlike its peers is Front Yard Bikes. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BATON ROUGE HEALTH DISTRICT ↗
- Who funds BATON ROUGE AREA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BATON ROUGE AREA CHAMBER ↗
- Who funds HOPE MINISTRIES OF BATON ROUGE ↗
- Who funds MID CITY REDEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds FRONT YARD BIKES ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds Arts Council of Greater Baton Rouge Inc ↗
- Who funds FOREKIDS FOUNDATIONS INC DBA ZURICH CLASSIC OF NEW ORLEANS ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds BATON ROUGE GREEN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Capital Region Industry for Sustainable Infrastructure Solutions ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL AREA UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds BIG BUDDY PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds LHA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Baton Rouge Symphony League Inc ↗
- Who funds CANCER ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW ORLEAN ↗
- Who funds The JL Foundation ↗
- Who funds MANNERS OF THE HEART INC ↗
- Who funds GENERAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MAYOR'S HEALTHY CITY INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds NEW ORLEANS LYMPHO-MANIACS CANCER FUND INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Credit Bureau of Baton Rouge Foundation · Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Louisiana Foundation · The Huey & Angelina Wilson Foundation · Albemarle Foundation · Baton Rouge Area Foundation · Rotary Club of Baton Rouge Foundation · The Merice Boo Johnston Grigsby Foundation · Irene W & Cb Pennington Private Foundation · Capital Area United Way · Shell USA Company Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization General Health System funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.