Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ziffrin Abbott Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Public Benefit$23kFood & Nutrition$5kSocial Science$5kArts & Culture$5kHuman Services$3kRecreation & Sports$2kEducation$2kCivil Rights$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$662k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS EDUCATION FUND INC$10,000
OPEN TABLE INC$2,500
F L A G FLAG FOOTBALL INC$2,000
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS LOTTE E SCHARFMAN MEMORIAL$2,000
MASSCREATIVE INC$1,500
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES$1,250
BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY$1,000
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS EDUCATION FUND$1,000
ACLU FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC$1,000
TRANSITMATTERS INC$900
IBIS REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INC$600
PRO PUBLICA INC$550
DIGNITY MATTERS INC$500
MAKING OPPORTUNITY COUNT INC$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MAKING OPPORTUNITY COUNT INC: $625 → 11%MAKING OPPORTUNITY COUNT INC: $500 → 11%DIGNITY MATTERS INC: $1k → 8%DIGNITY MATTERS INC: $500 → 8%DIGNITY MATTERS INC: $400 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$30k · 9 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against -16% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

$30k
$400

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
-16%

Still filing today

78%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCivil RightsHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OT
    OPEN TABLE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $5k · revenue +58%
  • LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS EDUCATION FUND
    3× · 2023–2025 · $4k · revenue +45%
  • Dignity Matters Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $2k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • PS
    PER SCHOLAS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $400 · revenue -16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
4
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
5
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
6
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
7
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
8
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
9
American Association of University Women Inc

Aauw advances gender equity for women and girls through research, education, and advocacy.

Education
10
League of Women Voters of Massachusetts

Lwvma, a nonpartisan organization, encourages informed and active participation in government, works to increase understanding of major public policy issues, and influences public policy through education and advocacy.

Civil Rights
11
University of Massachusetts Amherst Alumni Association Inc

To promote the interests of the university of massachusetts amherst through programs, services and communications that develop and reinforce the bonds between the university and its alumni; to validate the value and alumni pride in the…

—
12
Mit Free Speech Alliance

To promote free expression, academic freedom, viewpoint diversity, and open scientific inquiry in the MIT community

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Masscreative Inc; the most unlike its peers is Making Opportunity Count Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
4/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS EDUCATION FUND INC: $10,000 · OtherLEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS EDUCATION FUND INCTRANSITMATTERS INC: $4,700 · OtherTRANSITMATTERS INCLEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS LOTTE E SCHARFMAN MEMORIAL: $4,000 · OtherLEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS LOTTE E SCHARFMAN MEMORIALLEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS EDUCATION FUND: $4,000 · OtherLEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS EDUCATION FUNDBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · Other+3 more: $1,750 · Other+3 moreOPEN TABLE INC: $5,050 · Food & NutritionOPEN TABLE I…AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES: $5,025 · Social ScienceAMERICAN ACA…PRO PUBLICA INC: $3,350 · Arts & CulturePRO PUBLICA…MASSCREATIVE INC: $1,500 · Arts & CultureMASSCREATIV…Dignity Matters Inc: $2,300 · Human ServicesMAKING OPPORTUNITY COUNT INC: $1,125 · Human ServicesF L A G FLAG FOOTBALL INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyACLU FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $1,000 · Civil Rights
Other$25,450Food & Nutrition$5,050Social Science$5,025Arts & Culture$4,850Human Services$3,425Philanthropy$2,000Civil Rights$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPEN TABLE INC: $5,050 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES: $5,025 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS EDUCATION FUND: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $3,350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDignity Matters Inc: $2,300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetF L A G FLAG FOOTBALL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMASSCREATIVE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMAKING OPPORTUNITY COUNT INC: $1,125 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetACLU FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONEGOAL: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIBIS REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPER SCHOLAS INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA16.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ziffrin Abbott Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ziffrin Abbott Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Making Opportunity Count Inc: 28% of income from government
  • Masscreative Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Brandeis University: 9% of income from government
  • Ibis Reproductive Health Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Open Table Inc: 7% of income from government
  • American Academy of Arts & Sciences: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ziffrin Abbott Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph