· Private foundation
Zidell Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $158k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PORTLAND ART MUSEUM | $51,500 |
| LITERARY ARTS | $25,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES | $25,000 |
| PATRICIA RESER CENTER FOR THE ARTS | $20,000 |
| B'NAI BRITH CAMP | $18,000 |
| PROFILE THEATRE | $15,000 |
| END OF LIFE CHOICES OREGON | $15,000 |
| STORE TO DOOR | $10,000 |
| ROSE HAVEN | $10,000 |
| OREGON MUSIC HALL OF FAME | $10,000 |
| LIFT URBAN PORTLAND PANTRY | $10,000 |
| BELOVED BUILDERS | $9,650 |
| METROPOLITAN YOUTH SYMPHONY | $8,000 |
| GATHERMAKESHELTER | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $249k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TBTIVNU BUILDING JUSTICE5× · 2018–2023 · $150k · revenue +118%
- PPEAR4× · 2018–2022 · $140k · revenue +1%
- HTHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE5× · 2017–2021 · $125k · revenue +65%
Funded once
- MCMORRISON CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICESgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +47%
- PSPORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue -20%
- OSOREGON & SW WASHINGTON SUSAN G KOMENone grant, 2019 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…
The oregon center for public policy's mission is to achieve economic justice for all oregonians through research, analysis, and advocacy. ocpp works to change policies that foster economic security and stability for all oregonians. we do…
Pfm operates world-class farmers markets that contribute to the success of local food growers and producers and create vibrant community gatherings. as a trade association, success for our vendors is our primary objective. listening and…
Open signal's mission is to nurture the change-making power of community media in service of a just and equitable world.
Portland Public Library is a welcoming cultural center that brings people together and connects them with trusted resources, ideas, experiences, and information. We build a stronger community by inspiring learning, creativity, and…
To increase equitable access to healthful food and strengthen communities by empowering neighbors to share in the harvest and care of city-grown produce.
Orla serves as the leading industry advocate, striving to protect, improve and promote oregon hospitality.
Oregon Music Festival's mission is the performance, production, and promotion of classical music through orchestral, choral/orchestra, and chamber music.
Promote economic and social fairness by working in coalition open a broad range of issues and activities in the public arena
At l'arche portland people with and without developmental disabilities create home and build community together. we nurture long-term mutual relationships that reveal the gifts of people with developmental disabilities. in doing so we…
We offer our homeless neighbors accessible whole-person care to improve and support health, and to bridge a gap in trust between people and systems.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Literary Arts Inc and the most unlike its peers is Charity Global Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TIVNU BUILDING JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds PEAR ↗
- Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds B'NAI BRITH MEN'S CAMP ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BEAVERTON ARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Profile Theatre Project ↗
- Who funds HELPING HANDS REENTRY OUTREACH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds Metropolitan Youth Symphony ↗
- Who funds OREGON MUSIC HALL OF FAME ↗
- Who funds MORRISON CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILD SERVICE ↗
- Who funds END OF LIFE CHOICES - OREGON ↗
- Who funds STORE TO DOOR ↗
- Who funds OREGON BALLET THEATRE ↗
- Who funds LITERARY ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds BROWN HOPE ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds IMMIGRANT STORY ↗
- Who funds ROSE HAVEN CIC ↗
- Who funds MICRO ENTERPRISE SERVICES OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds OVARIAN CANCER ALLIANCE OF OREGON AND SW WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds OUTSIDE IN ↗
- Who funds Chehalem Center Association dba Chehalem Cultural Center ↗
- Who funds CHARITABLE PARTNERSHIP FUND ↗
- Who funds Children's Cancer Association ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Collins Foundation · Oregon Jewish Community Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Harold & Arlene Schnitzer Care Foundation · The Reser Family Foundation · Juan Young Trust · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Zidell Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Morrison Child and Family Services — 91% of income from government
- Outside in — 33% of income from government
- Partners for a Hunger Free Oregon — 31% of income from government
- Boost Oregon — 22% of income from government
- Helping Hands Reentry Outreach Centers — 18% of income from government
- Medical Teams International — 14% of income from government
- Literary Arts Inc — 10% of income from government
- Gather Make Shelter — 7% of income from government
- B'nai Brith Men's Camp Association — 7% of income from government
- Portland Community College Foundation Inc — 5% of income from government
- Micro Enterprise Services of Oregon — 5% of income from government
- Profile Theatre Project — 2% of income from government
- Pear — 1% of income from government
- Portland Art Museum — 1% of income from government
- Metropolitan Youth Symphony — 1% of income from government
- Beaverton Arts Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Oregon Ballet Theatre — 0% of income from government
- Portland State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Zidell Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Zidell Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.