Skip to content

· Private foundation

Youth Educational Council Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2025still arriving
36
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$350
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$7kArts & Culture$2kEducation$910Civil Rights$805Environment$679Health$525Animals$446Recreation & Sports$134Other$0
02FY2025 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$25
Median grant
8
States reached
$24k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION ETZ CHAIM$350
BROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION$250
CONGREGATION ETZ CHAIM$200
LAMBDA LEGAL$100
AMERICAN FORESTS$50
DUCKS UNLIMITED$50
EQUALITY FLORIDA INSTITUTE$50
TREVOR PROJECT$30
GLSEN$25
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY$25
YELLOWSTONE FOREVER$25
SPECIAL OLYMPICS$25
NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY$25
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI$25
THE PRIDE CENTER$25
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $175) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $25 → 13%PRIDE CENTER: $25 → 13%PRIDE CENTER: $25 → 13%PRIDE CENTER: $25 → 13%PRIDE CENTER: $25 → 13%PRIDE CENTER: $25 → 13%THE PRIDE CENTER: $25 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
NY
CA
VA
TN
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13k · 36 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
10

Total granted

$13k
$910

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+35%

Still filing today

44%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $745 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationArts & CultureCivil RightsHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $205 · revenue +40%
  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $200 · revenue +23%
  • TG
    THE GAY & LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER FORT LAUDERDALE INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $150 · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • TE
    The Epstein School
    one grant, 2017 · $500
  • GM
    GAY MEN'S CHORUS OF SOUTH FLORIDA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $150 · revenue +97%
  • TA
    TSR Adventures Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $100 · revenue -95%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Amazon Conservation Team

The amazon conservation team (act) partners with indigenous and other local communities to protect tropical forests and strengthen traditional culture.

Science & Tech
3
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.": - count it: our work is…

International
6
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
7
Climate Institute

The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…

Environment
8
Natural Resources Defense Council Inc

We safeguard the earth: its people, its plants and animals, and (see schedule o) the natural systems on which all life depends. we work to restore the integrity of the elements that sustain life - air, land, and water - to defend…

Environment
9
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
10
Parliamentarians for Global Action

Parliamentarians for global action (pga) is a non-partisan ngo network of legislators from all regions of the world acting in their individual capacity to advocate for human rights, democracy, and the rule of law; peace and human security;…

International
11
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
12
Rare

Rare inspires change so people and nature thrive.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Lgbtq Task Force; the most unlike its peers is University of Miami. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
18/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION ETZ CHAIM INC: $5,935 · OtherCONGREGATION ETZ CHAIM INCBROWARD PERFORMING ARTS: $1,500 · OtherBROWARD PERFORMING ARTSTEMPLE SINAI JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF HOLLYWOOD INC: $1,360 · OtherTEMPLE SINAI JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF HOLLYWOOD INCThe Epstein School: $500 · Other+37 more: $3,743 · Other+37 moreNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $140 · EnvironmentYELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $140 · EnvironmentNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $100 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $75 · EnvironmentDucks Unlimited Inc: $70 · EnvironmentAmerican Forests: $25 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $20 · EnvironmentSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $205 · EducationPOINT FOUNDATION: $70 · EducationUniversity of Miami: $25 · EducationSIERA CHARTER SCHOOL: $20 · EducationGAY MEN'S CHORUS OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $150 · Arts & CultureSOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC: $120 · Arts & CultureMuseum of Modern Art: $25 · Arts & CultureLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC: $125 · Civil RightsTREVOR PROJECT INC: $55 · Civil RightsEQUALITY FLORIDA INSTITUTE INC: $50 · Civil RightsSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $200 · Crime & LegalTHE GAY & LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER FORT LAUDERDALE INC: $150 · Human ServicesAIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $25 · Human Services
Other$13,038Environment$570Education$320Arts & Culture$295Civil Rights$230Crime & Legal$200Human Services$175

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $205 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $200 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGLAAD INC: $175 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $155 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGAY MEN'S CHORUS OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE: $150 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GAY & LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER FORT LAUDERDALE INC: $150 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $140 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $140 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $136 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC: $120 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTSR Adventures Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $75 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $70 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOINT FOUNDATION: $70 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGAY MEN'S HEALTH CRISIS INC: $60 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $55 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $45 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Forests: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERA CHARTER SCHOOL: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GLAAD INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds GAY MEN'S CHORUS OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE ↗
  • Who funds THE GAY & LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER FORT LAUDERDALE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE FOREVER ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC ↗
  • Who funds TSR Adventures Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
  • Who funds POINT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GAY MEN'S HEALTH CRISIS INC ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Our Fund Foundation IncFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Our Fund Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Youth Educational Council Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Youth Educational Council Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • South Florida Pbs Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Youth Educational Council’s filings →

More from the funding graph