How much did Youth Collaboratory Inc grant in FY2024?

Youth Collaboratory Inc reported 9 grants totaling $333,930 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is Youth Collaboratory Inc based?

Youth Collaboratory Inc is based in PA.

Youth Collaboratory Inc

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

Youth Collaboratory Inc

Youth Collaboratory harnesses the power of the youth services community to innovate, evaluate, and drive effective strategies that assure the safety and well-being of youth and young adults, unlocking their limitless potential.

$334k

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

States reached

$131k

Largest

01What you fund

01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Youth Development$9.2MHuman Services$1.1MHealth$274kArts & Culture$249kEducation$181kPhilanthropy$100kHousing & Shelter$97k

02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $10k
$10k–50k6 grants · $135k
$50k–250k2 grants · $187k

$23,291

Median grant

States reached

$917k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago	$130,739
Lexington Leadership	$56,574
Connections Mentor	$29,407
BBBS of Flint and Genesee	$24,000
LIFT Community Action Agency	$23,291
Bolder Options	$22,220
BBBS of Southeast Michigan	$21,350
BBBS of Connecticut	$14,862
Street Soccer USA Bay Area	$9,860

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$11M · 65 repeat orgs$247k to everyone else

65 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 59 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$11M

$187k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%

+33%

Still filing today

88%

75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthArts & CultureEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CH
CHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN
4× · 2021–2024 · $866k · revenue +14%
BB
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INCORPORATED
6× · 2017–2022 · $440k · revenue +68%
BB
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC
6× · 2017–2023 · $406k · revenue +106%

Funded once

BB
BIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS OF MIDDLE TNgraduated
one grant, 2017 · $54k · revenue +73%
BB
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL INDIANA INCgraduated
one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +33%
NG
NEBRASKA GAME AND PARKS COMMISSION
one grant, 2017 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Big Brothers Big Sisters of Manitowoc County Inc

To provide children facing adversity with strong, enduring, professionally supported one on one relationships that change their lives for the better, forever.

—

Big Brothers Big Sisters of Southeastern Ohio

To help children reach their potential through professionally supported, one-to-one relationships with measurable impact. this is achieved by matching children with adults in mentoring relationships, providing children with companionship…

—

Big Brothers-Big Sisters of Metropolitan Chicago

Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite and empower the promise of youth. we nurture children, strengthen communities and believe that inherent in every child is the ability to succeed and thrive in life.

—

Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Montana

Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

—

Big Brothers Big Sisters of Long Island Inc

To create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

—

Big Brothers - Big Sisters of York County Inc

To provide children facing adversity with strong and enduring, professionally supported 1-to-1 relationships that change their lives for the better, forever. provides mentoring opportunities to more than 110 youth each year.

—

Big Brothers Big Sisters of Northwest Florida Inc

To organize, under professional direction, mature and responsible adults to provide, on a volunteer basis, a one to one friendship (mentor) to boys and girls who are deprived of a wholesome relationship with a parent or other surrogate…

—

Big Brothers Big Sisters of Southwest Michigan

Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

—

Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Heart of Georgia Inc

The mission of big brothers big sisters is to create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

—

Big Brothers Big Sisters of Ba Brunswick

To create and support one to one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

—

Big Brothers Big Sisters of Greater Cleveland

Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

Youth Development

Big Brothers and Big Sisters O

The organization provides quality volunteer and professional contract mentoring services in the black hills area, on a one to one basis for youth with limited parental support to assist them in achieving

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Triangle Inc and the most unlike its peers is Landmarks for Families Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

3%2/72

the rest of the field

13%

240,394/1,819,493

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

63/67

Grantees still filing

46/67

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$5,161,646Human Services$2,732,263Youth Development$2,541,476Arts & Culture$249,379Education$230,407Health$165,300Employment$142,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Big Brothers Big Sisters Of AmericaFL62.8× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Big Brothers Big Sisters Of America · Inspire Brands Foundation Inc · Tickets for Kids Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Gap Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Charles Schwab Foundation · Union Pacific Foundation · American Express Foundation · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · Dutch Bros Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Youth Collaboratory Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

27report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

4rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home

State money flows

the interactive map of money crossing state lines