Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Young Invincibles

YOUNG INVINCIBLES' mission is to amplify the voices of young adults in the political process and expand economic opportunity for our generation.

$8k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$1.0MPublic Benefit$1.0MHealth$433kHuman Services$71kEnvironment$50kHousing & Shelter$40kCommunity Improvement$33kPhilanthropy$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BREAKTHROUGH CENTRAL TEXAS$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $177k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CENTER FOR THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE DISABLED NEW YORK: $25k → 17%STUDENT ORGANIZING INC: $14k → 16%NEW YORKERS FOR ACCESSIBLE HEALTH COVERAGE: $19k → 17%NEW YORKERS FOR ACCESSIBLE HEALTH COVERAGE: $19k → 17%COMMUNITY SERVICE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $38k → 17%COMMUNITY SERVICE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $38k → 17%COMMUNITY SERVICE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
IN
OH
NJ
CA
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
OK
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 27 repeat orgs$854k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
22

Total granted

$1.9M
$854k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
+122%

Still filing today

85%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCivil RightsPublic BenefitHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FE
    Fair Elections Center
    4× · 2017–2020 · $251k · revenue ×31
  • CF
    Center for Public Policy Priorities
    4× · 2017–2020 · $237k · revenue +94%
  • Civic Nation
    4× · 2017–2020 · $161k · revenue +241%

Funded once

  • SS
    SAVI SOLUTIONS PBC
    one grant, 2018 · $359k
  • YA
    YI ADVISORS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $77k
  • Trustees of Tufts Collegegraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue +39%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
2
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
3
New York Public Interest Research Group Inc

The new york public interest research group nypirg, new york state's largest studentdirected research and civic engagement organization, is uniquely designed to provideexperiential learning and civic engagement opportunities for college…

—
4
Open Campus Media Inc

Higher education shapes the future of every community in america-determining who moves up the economic ladder, where good jobs develop, and how regions prosper. this promise depends on the public's ability to see and understand how their…

Arts & Culture
5
University of California Student Association

The University of California Student Association (UCSA) is a coalition of students and student governments that aims to provide a collective voice for all students through advocacy and direct action. UCSA participates in the shared…

Education
6
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
7
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
8
Career Education Colleges and Universities

The career education colleges and universities (cecu) is the premier source of crucial information and public policy recommendations that promote access to career education and the importance of workforce development.

—
9
American Council On Education

Ace leads higher education with a united vision for the future, galvanizing our members to make change. the council collaborates across the sector to design solutions for today's challenges, serves the needs of a diverse student…

Education
10
National Alliance of Concurrent Enrollment Partnerships Inc

Advancing a national community to foster equity in dual and concurrent enrollment through accreditation, advocacy, research, and professional development.

Education
11
Consortium of Universities of the Washington Metropolitan Area

To promote the improvement of educational, scientific and literary facilities and programs at and among participating institutions of higher education of the Washington metropolitan area, to prevent needless duplication in order that each…

Education
12
College Summit Inc

College summit, inc. d/b/a peerforward (peerforward)'s mission is to unleash the power of positive peer influence to transform the lives of youth living in low-income communities by connecting them to college and careers. in low-income…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Catalyst Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Andrew Goodman Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAffordable Housing Developm…Youth Development ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Policy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%12%5–10yr19%27%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%21%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%10%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/49
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,516

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/40
Grantees still filing
34/40
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAVI SOLUTIONS PBC — $358,804 · OtherSAVI SOLUTIONS PBCSTUDENT DEBT CRISIS CENTER — $92,500 · OtherSTUDENT DEBT CRISIS CENTERYI ADVISORS INC — $77,000 · OtherYI ADVISORS INCTHE ANDREW GOODMAN FOUNDATION INC — $70,000 · OtherTHE ANDREW GOODMAN FOUNDATION INCNAMI Chicago — $50,315 · OtherPIRG NEW VOTERS PROJECT INC — $41,250 · OtherNATIONAL CAMPUS LEADERSHIP COUNCIL — $37,625 · OtherMake the Road New York — $50,000 · OtherSOUTHERN ALLIANCE FOR CLEAN ENERGY — $50,000 · OtherCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS — $39,500 · Other+12 more — $239,569 · Other+12 moreCivic Nation — $161,020 · EducationCivic NationMinnesota State College Student Association Inc — $89,500 · EducationMinnesota State Coll…Trustees of Tufts College — $75,000 · EducationTrustees of Tufts Co…BLUEPRINT NORTH CAROLINA — $40,000 · EducationBLUEPRINT NORTH CARO…The Education Trust Inc — $35,000 · EducationThe Education Trust …FOUNDATION FOR CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES — $29,898 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR CALIF…CAMPUS COMPACT — $27,000 · EducationCAMPUS COMPACTBREAKTHROUGH — $17,500 · Education+1 more — $15,000 · EducationFair Elections Center — $250,575 · Civil RightsFair Elections C…DEMOCRACY WORKS INC — $55,600 · Civil RightsDEMOCRACY WORKS …VOTO LATINO FOUNDATION INC — $49,000 · Civil RightsVOTO LATINO FOUN…ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ORGANIZING — $23,400 · Civil RightsALLIANCE FOR YOU…+2 more — $14,258 · Civil RightsCenter for Public Policy Priorities — $237,000 · Public BenefitCenter for Publ…VETERANS EDUCATION SUCCESS INC — $70,000 · Public BenefitVETERANS EDUCAT…PUBLIC POLICY AND EDUCATION FUND OF NEW YORK INC — $50,000 · Public BenefitPUBLIC POLICY A…+1 more — $6,000 · Public BenefitCOMMUNITY SERVICE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK — $100,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR INDEPENDENCE OF THE DISABLED IN NEW YORK INC — $62,500 · Human ServicesSTUDENT ORGANIZING INC — $14,250 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY CATALYST INC — $75,000 · HealthMEDICARE RIGHTS CENTER INC — $40,000 · HealthFORWARD MT FOUNDATION — $30,000 · HealthURBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER CHATTANOOGA — $40,000 · Community ImprovementWESTERN ORGANIZATION OF RESOURCE COUNCILS EDUCATION PROJECT — $13,000 · Community Improvement
Other$1,106,563Education$489,918Civil Rights$392,833Public Benefit$363,000Human Services$176,750Health$145,000Community Improvement$53,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFair Elections Center — $250,575 over 4y, 13% of budgetCenter for Public Policy Priorities — $237,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetCivic Nation — $161,020 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK — $100,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSTUDENT DEBT CRISIS CENTER — $92,500 over 2y, 20% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College — $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY CATALYST INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetVETERANS EDUCATION SUCCESS INC — $70,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetTHE ANDREW GOODMAN FOUNDATION INC — $70,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetCENTER FOR INDEPENDENCE OF THE DISABLED IN NEW YORK INC — $62,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetDEMOCRACY WORKS INC — $55,600 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNAMI Chicago — $50,315 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPUBLIC POLICY AND EDUCATION FUND OF NEW YORK INC — $50,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMake the Road New York — $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN ALLIANCE FOR CLEAN ENERGY — $50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetVOTO LATINO FOUNDATION INC — $49,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBLUEPRINT NORTH CAROLINA — $40,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetMEDICARE RIGHTS CENTER INC — $40,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER CHATTANOOGA — $40,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS — $39,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL CAMPUS LEADERSHIP COUNCIL — $37,625 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetThe Education Trust Inc — $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT PERICLES INC — $30,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetFORWARD MT FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES — $29,898 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSCHOLARS STRATEGY NETWORK — $29,130 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CITIZENSHIP — $27,071 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCAMPUS COMPACT — $27,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ORGANIZING — $23,400 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH — $17,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOHIO CAMPUS COMPACT — $15,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetWESTERN ORGANIZATION OF RESOURCE COUNCILS EDUCATION PROJECT — $13,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRISE EDUCATION FUND — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetENROLL AMERICA — $9,222 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAsian & Pacific Islander American Vote — $7,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetEmgage Foundation Inc — $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Venture FundNEO Philanthropy IncSilicon Valley Commun…National Conference o…State VoicesTides FoundationImpactassetsincThe Ford FoundationCivic NationLumina Foundation for…Tides CenterRockefeller Philanthr…
New Venture FundDC35.7× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Venture Fund · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · National Conference on Citizenship · State Voices · Tides Foundation · Impactassetsinc · The Ford Foundation · Civic Nation · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · Tides Center · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Young Invincibles funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Community Catalyst Inc — 15% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
  • Campus Compact — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home