Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

National Conference on Citizenship

Ncoc is a congressionally-chartered nonprofit committed to strengthening democracy by supporting local leaders and non-partisan projects dedicated to citizen engagement and public service.

$76k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Public Benefit$1.6MEducation$378kCommunity Improvement$51kCivil Rights$10kSocial Science$10k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $40,909 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $76,209 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $35,300 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$40,909
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW PUBLIC$40,909
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ALIENTO EDUCATION FUND: $30k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
NC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

30%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$530k · 7 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +78% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
73

Total granted

$530k
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+16%

Still filing today

100%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCivil RightsPublic BenefitPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FE
    Fair Elections Center
    2× · 2020–2021 · $251k · revenue +78%
  • DS
    DATA & SOCIETY RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $159k · revenue +2%
  • AA
    ALABAMA A&M UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $41k · revenue ×17

Funded once

  • AC
    ALLEGANY COLLEGE OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $88k · revenue +50%
  • MS
    Minnesota State College Student Association Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $43k · revenue +21%
  • TA
    THE ANDREW GOODMAN FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $39k · revenue -1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
5
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
6
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
7
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
8
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
9
Carleton College

See schedule o.founded in 1866, carleton college is a private, coeducational liberal arts college of 2,007 students located in the historic river town of northfield, minnesota. nationally recognized as the nation's top college for…

Education
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
12
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Queens University of Charlotte and the most unlike its peers is The Andrew Goodman Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsCommunity College Foundatio…Faith-Based Social ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportHealth Access Advocacy and …Jewish Community Organizati…Youth Development ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Policy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%36%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%3%<5yr14%23%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%11%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%34%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/83
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,482

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
55/56
Grantees still filing
40/56
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $250,903 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAALLEGANY COLLEGE OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC — $87,882 · EducationALLEGANY COLLEGE OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INCMinnesota State College Student Association Inc — $42,750 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $39,127 · EducationBRIDGE ALLIANCE EDUCATION FUND — $30,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $28,920 · Education+25 more — $323,854 · Education+25 moreALABAMA A&M UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $41,000 · OtherALABAMA A&M UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONTHE ANDREW GOODMAN FOUNDATION INC — $38,500 · OtherTHE ANDREW GOODMAN FOUNDATION INCUNIVERSITY OF MAINE SYSTEM INC — $36,396 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MAINE SYSTEM INCUNIVERSITY OF NORTH GEORGIA — $33,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $30,160 · OtherPIRG NEW VOTERS PROJECT INC — $25,000 · OtherGEORGIA SHIFT INC — $25,000 · OtherNORTH CAROLINA A & T STATE UNIVERSITY — $22,050 · OtherTHE ELIZABETH CITY STATE UNIV FOUNDATION — $22,000 · Other+31 more — $366,717 · Other+31 moreFair Elections Center — $251,290 · Civil RightsFair Elections Ce…ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ORGANIZING — $32,540 · Civil RightsALLIANCE FOR YOUT…Democracy North Carolina — $25,000 · Civil RightsDemocracy North C…NEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC — $12,250 · Civil RightsDATA & SOCIETY RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $159,250 · Public BenefitDATA & SOCI…COMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND — $34,000 · Public BenefitCOMMON CAUS…LISTEN FIRST PROJECT INC — $10,000 · Public BenefitNEW PUBLIC INC — $40,909 · Science & TechPROJECT PERICLES INC — $20,000 · PhilanthropyPhilanthropy for Active Civic Engagement — $10,000 · PhilanthropyMARICOPA COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION — $6,000 · PhilanthropyAliento Education Fund — $30,000 · Human Services
Education$803,436Other$639,823Civil Rights$321,080Public Benefit$203,250Science & Tech$40,909Philanthropy$36,000Human Services$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFair Elections Center — $251,290 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $250,903 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDATA & SOCIETY RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $159,250 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetALLEGANY COLLEGE OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC — $87,882 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetMinnesota State College Student Association Inc — $42,750 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetALABAMA A&M UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $41,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetNEW PUBLIC INC — $40,909 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $39,127 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANDREW GOODMAN FOUNDATION INC — $38,500 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCOMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND — $34,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ORGANIZING — $32,540 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAliento Education Fund — $30,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBRIDGE ALLIANCE EDUCATION FUND — $30,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $28,920 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQueens University of Charlotte — $26,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetElon University — $25,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPIRG NEW VOTERS PROJECT INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetHENRY FORD COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDemocracy North Carolina — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGEORGIA SHIFT INC — $25,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetTHE ELIZABETH CITY STATE UNIV FOUNDATION — $22,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetClark Atlanta University Inc — $21,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT PERICLES INC — $20,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetMarquette University — $19,512 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAgnes Scott College — $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL LAKES COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $16,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBowdoin College — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORWARD MT FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetSTATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION — $14,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $14,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHAMPTON COUNTY AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $13,304 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetColumbia College Chicago — $12,868 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe President and Trustees of Colby College — $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC — $12,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA — $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCIRCADIUM — $11,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetPRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE — $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PIEDMONT COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $10,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLINCOLN UNIVERSITY — $10,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAITH IN ACTION NETWORK — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPhilanthropy for Active Civic Engagement — $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetLISTEN FIRST PROJECT INC — $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetCEDAR CREST COLLEGE — $9,595 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCivic Nation — $9,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY UNION CORP — $8,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPASSAIC COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBenedictine University — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

NEO Philanthropy IncYoung InvinciblesNational Collegiate A…New Venture FundTulsa Community Found…Folds of Honor Founda…Ernst & Young Foundat…Tides FoundationAmalgamated Charitabl…The Ford FoundationIbm International Fou…Lowes Foundation
NEO Philanthropy IncNY29.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: NEO Philanthropy Inc · Young Invincibles · National Collegiate Athletic Association · New Venture Fund · Tulsa Community Foundation · Folds of Honor Foundation · Ernst & Young Foundation · Tides Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Lowes Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization National Conference on Citizenship funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines