· Private foundation
Yost Elizabeth B Tr Uwo
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $119k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $86k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ANSON COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM | $85,500 |
| ANSON CRISIS MINISTRY | $40,000 |
| HEALTHQUEST | $35,000 |
| ANSON COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL | $18,992 |
| ANSON ATHLETIC YOUTH ASSOCIATION | $15,000 |
| ROTARY PLANETARIUM & SCIENCE CENTER | $10,000 |
| FOOD FOR FAMILIES NC INC | $8,000 |
| ANSON COUNTY HOMES OF HOPE | $7,000 |
| ANSON COUNTY COOPERATIVE EXTENSION | $5,000 |
| ANSON COUNTY 4-H | $3,500 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $218k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against -55% for those funded once.
18 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- ACANSON CRISIS MINISTRY7× · 2017–2025 · $170k · revenue +22%
- ACANSON COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL INC7× · 2018–2025 · $117k · revenue +44%
- ACANSON COUNTY HOMES OF HOPE7× · 2019–2025 · $51k · revenue +287%
Funded once
- AEANSON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONone grant, 2017 · $15k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $10k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Dedicated to supporting the anson county animal shelter as well as providing resources and implementing programs to benefit the lives of animals in anson county
Education regarding beef production
To provide affordable housing for low income families.
Provide food to seniors
To build, manage, and supervise senior citizen housing facilities and provide any and all related services.
Helping victims of domestic violence
Animal protection
To improve the health of the people of western north carolina and the surrounding region. the entity's operations ceased due to sale of its assets, including the hospital facility, on 2/1/19. the entity is in the process of winding down…
Provide assistance to individuals in need in the nash county, north carolina area.
To promote and preserve documentation of the history of person county, north carolina
To provide food and clothing to needy
Food distribution to the needy
How this is measured
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ANSON CRISIS MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds ANSON COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds ANSON ATHLETIC YOUTH ASSOCIATION I INC ↗
- Who funds ANSON COUNTY HOMES OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds FEED MY LAMBS INC ↗
- Who funds ANSON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR FAMILIES NC INC ↗
- Who funds ANSON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds ANSON COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds UPTOWN WADESBORO INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Effie Allen Little Foundation Inc · James R and Bronnie L Braswell Trust George C Bower Jr Trustee · Smith Gen Wa Tr Uw - Item Xxii · United Way of Greater Charlotte Inc · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Yost Elizabeth B Tr Uwo funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yost Elizabeth B Tr Uwo. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Yost Elizabeth B Tr Uwo’s filings →