Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Yosef and Carmela Klein Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$171k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$85k
Largest
01What you fund
0167% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$413kInternational$80kAnimals$77kHealth$75kYouth Development$45kArts & Culture$12kHuman Services$4kOther$353k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $31k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $135k
$11,020
Median grant
3
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC$85,000
The Israel Healthcare Foundation$50,000
Maagalim Community Circles$11,020
WESTSIDE GERMAN SHEPHERD RESCUE$10,000
GERMAN SHEPHERD RESCUE OF ORANGE$10,000
United States Holocaust Memorial$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WE SPARK: $1k → 14%WE SPARK: $1k → 14%WE SPARK: $1k → 14%WE SPARK: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 35% of Yosef and Carmela Klein Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 28% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 24% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Yosef and Carmela Klein Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 9.2% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$574k · 20 repeat orgs$72k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against -10% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
3

Total granted

$574k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
-10%

Still filing today

40%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalAnimalsArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WG
    WESTSIDE GERMAN SHEPHERD RESCUE OF LOS ANGELES
    6× · 2019–2024 · $77k · revenue +74%
  • MC
    MAAGALIM COMMUNITY CIRCLES INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $21k · revenue +17%
  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    5× · 2018–2024 · $12k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • LT
    Larger Than Life - LA Family
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -10%
  • SF
    SOLDIERS FOR STRAY RESCUE REHAB
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • M
    MAKE-A-WISH
    one grant, 2021 · $50

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
2
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
3
Friends of United Hatzalah Inc

Friends of united hatzalah, inc .(fouh) raises and provides funding to not-for-profit organizations that provide medical and trauma-related first responder services in israel and around the world. fouh focuses the majority of its support…

Arts & Culture
4
Physicians for Palestine
Health
5
Israel Cancer Research Fund Inc

To support cancer research in israel, for the benefit of israel and all mankind.

6
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
7
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
8
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

9
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
10
Bronfman Youth Fellowships to Israel in Inc
Youth Development
11
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
12
American Friends of Herzog Hospital Inc

The organization was formed to provide financial support to fund services, capital projects, clinical research, and purchase of new equipment for herzog hospital in jerusalem, which is the 3rd largest hospital in jerusalem and is israel's…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pef Israel Endowment Funds Inc and the most unlike its peers is Iowa City Robotics. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $413,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INCBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL — $76,800 · OtherBIRTHRIGHT ISRAELIndividual grant recipient — $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGERMAN SHEPHERD RESCUE OF ORANGE — $58,108 · OtherGERMAN SHEPHERD RESCUE OF ORANGETHE JEWISH FEDERATION — $37,300 · OtherTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONCHLA — $25,100 · OtherCHLATHE LONE SOLDIER CENTER — $25,000 · OtherTHE LONE SOLDIER CENTERAMITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $20,000 · OtherAMITY EDUCATION FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $19,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+7 more — $31,600 · Other+7 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF REICHMAN UNIVERSITY INC — $60,000 · InternationalLarger Than Life - LA Family — $20,000 · InternationalWESTSIDE GERMAN SHEPHERD RESCUE OF LOS ANGELES — $76,873 · AnimalsISRAEL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · HealthMAAGALIM COMMUNITY CIRCLES INC — $21,020 · HealthFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC — $3,600 · HealthIowa City Robotics — $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $11,600 · Arts & CultureWESPARK INC — $4,000 · Human Services
Philanthropy$413,000Other$353,408International$80,000Animals$76,873Health$74,620Youth Development$45,000Arts & Culture$11,600Human Services$4,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $413,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWESTSIDE GERMAN SHEPHERD RESCUE OF LOS ANGELES — $76,873 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF REICHMAN UNIVERSITY INC — $60,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetISRAEL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMAAGALIM COMMUNITY CIRCLES INC — $21,020 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetLarger Than Life - LA Family — $20,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $11,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBeit T'Shuvah — $7,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWESPARK INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC — $3,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC
  • Who funds WESTSIDE GERMAN SHEPHERD RESCUE OF LOS ANGELES
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF REICHMAN UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds ISRAEL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Iowa City Robotics
  • Who funds MAAGALIM COMMUNITY CIRCLES INC
  • Who funds Larger Than Life - LA Family
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
  • Who funds Beit T'Shuvah
  • Who funds WESPARK INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Yosef and Carmela Klein Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph