Skip to content
Yoosufani Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Yoosufani Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$625k
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Civil Rights$565kEducation$100kEnvironment$90kInternational$78kPhilanthropy$50kPublic Benefit$40kCrime & Legal$38kReligion$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $538k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS$50,000
AMERICAN MUSLIMS FOR PALESTINE$35,000
Individual grant recipient$35,000
US CAMPAIGE FOR PALESTINIAN RIGHTS$35,000
CODEPINK WOMEN FOR PEACE$35,000
BREAKTHROUGH BT MEDIA INC$35,000
JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE$35,000
CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS$32,500
CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS$30,000
AMERICAN MUSLIMS FOR PALESTINE$25,000
CODEPINK WOMEN FOR PEACE$25,000
DAWN$25,000
US CAMPAIGE FOR PALESTINIAN RIGHTS$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%CODEPINK WOMEN FOR PEACE: $35k → 14%BREAKTHROUGH BT MEDIA INC: $35k → 17%DAWN: $25k → 20%ISLAMIC CENTER OF GREATER AUSTIN: $2k → 10%MUSLIM LEGAL FUND OF AMERICA: $10k → 14%CAIR-FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 14%HASINA BATTLA CHARITABLE TRUST: $40k → 13%THE CENTER FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH: $5k → 14%AMERICAN MUSLIMS FOR PALESTINE: $35k → 6%CODEPINK WOMEN FOR PEACE: $25k → 14%BREAKTHROUGH BT MEDIA INC: $5k → 17%DAWN: $20k → 20%ISLAMIC CENTER OF GREATER AUSTIN: $2k → 10%MUSLIM LEGAL FUND OF AMERICA: $10k → 14%CAIR FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 14%HASINA BATTLA CHARITABLE TRUST: $10k → 13%THE CENTER FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH: $5k → 14%AMERICAN MUSLIMS FOR PALESTINE: $25k → 6%CODEPINK WOMEN FOR PEACE: $25k → 14%CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: $50k → 17%ISLAMIC CENTER OF GREATER AUSTIN: $2k → 10%MUSLIM LEGAL FUND OF AMERICA: $10k → 14%CAIR FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 14%THE ELECTRONIC INTIFADA: $35k → 14%AJP EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 6%CODEPINK WOMEN FOR PEACE: $15k → 14%CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: $33k → 17%ISLAMIC CENTER OF GREATER AUSTIN: $2k → 10%MUSLIM LEGAL FUND OF AMERICA: $8k → 14%CAIR-FOUNDATION INC: $8k → 14%THE ELECTRONIC INTIFADA: $25k → 14%AJP EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $15k → 6%CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: $30k → 17%ISLAMIC CENTER OF GREATER AUSTIN: $2k → 10%AJP EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $15k → 6%CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: $25k → 17%ISLAMIC CENTER OF GREATER AUSTIN: $2k → 10%BONDH-E-SHAMS INC: $40k → 17%ISLAMIC CENTER OF GREATER AUSTIN: $2k → 10%BONDH-E-SHAMS INC: $25k → 17%ISLAMIC CENTER OF GREATER AUSTIN: $2k → 10%BONDH-E-SHAMS INC: $25k → 17%ISLAMIC CENTER OF GREATER AUSTIN: $1k → 10%ISLAMIC CENTER OF GREATER AUSTIN: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
CA
VA
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Yoosufani Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Yoosufani Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 20% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$329k · 5 repeat orgs$668k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$329k
$138k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
-5%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $530k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsInternationalYouth DevelopmentEducationArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AJ
    A JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $115k · revenue +221%
  • BI
    BONDH-E-SHAMS INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $90k · revenue +22%
  • CI
    CAIR-FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $38k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • AE
    AJP EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC AMERICAN MUSLIMS FOR PALESTINE
    one grant, 2023 · $55k · revenue -5%
  • Education For Just Peace in Middle East
    one grant, 2023 · $55k · revenue -11%
  • IC
    ISLAMIC CENTER OF GREATER AUSTIN
    one grant, 2023 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foundation for Middle East Peace
Philanthropy
2
Minaret of Freedom Institute

Our mission is to our mission is to counter distortions and misconceptions about Islamic beliefs and practice to demonstrate the Islamic origins of modern values like the rule of law and sciences like market economics to advance the status…

Health
3
Ensaaf

Ensaaf, which means "justice" in many south Asian languages, works to end impunity and achieve justice for crimes against humanity in India, with a focus on Punjab, by documenting abuses, bringing perpetrators to justice, and organizing…

International
4
Physicians for Palestine
Health
5
Muslims for Progressive Values

Mpv is creating a culture rooted in human rights in muslim societies in the u.s. and around the world.

Religion
6
Coalition for Democracy and Human Rights in Iran
Civil Rights
7
American Muslim Instituition

Human Rights Project

Arts & Culture
8
Cair Michigan Inc

The organizations mission is to enhance the understanding of Islam, encourage dialogue, protect civil liberties, and empower American Muslims and build coalitions to promote justice and mutual understanding through education, mediation,…

International
9
Global Policy Forum Inc

Research and education of United Nations activities

International
10
Cair Nj Inc

To protect civil rights and liberties, encourage dialogue and understanding of Islam, and to empower American Muslims by building coalitions to promote justice and mutual understanding.

Civil Rights
11
Council for Democracy & Tolerance

SEE PART 1, LINE A MISSION AND PRINCIPLESAdvocating universal individual human rights without exceptions, Advocating literacy and education as the cornerstones to personal development and true humanity, Empowering and supporting…

—
12
Muslim Power Building Project

The Muslim Power Building Project (MPBP) provides training, resources, and collaborative learning space for Muslim organizers to advance racial equity, foster collective action, and create sustainable social change by building power rooted…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Education for Just Peace in Middle East; the most unlike its peers is Bondh-E-Shams Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUS CAMPAIGE FOR PALESTINIAN RIGHTS: $60,000 · OtherUS CAMPAIGE FOR PALESTINIAN RIG…AMERICAN MUSLIMS FOR PALESTINE: $60,000 · OtherAMERICAN MUSLIMS FOR PALESTINEDAWN: $45,000 · OtherDAWNISLAMIC CENTER OF GREATER AUSTIN: $18,000 · OtherISLAMIC CENTER OF GREATER AUSTI…Individual grant recipient: $17,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientElectronic Frontier Foundation Inc: $10,000 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH: $10,000 · OtherCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: $137,500 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONA…CAIR-FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 · Civil RightsCAIR-FOUNDATION INCMUSLIM LEGAL FUND OF AMERICA: $37,500 · Civil RightsMUSLIM LEGAL FUND OF AME…A JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE: $115,000 · InternationalA JEWISH VOICE FOR …Education For Just Peace in Middle East: $55,000 · InternationalEducation For Just …BONDH-E-SHAMS INC: $89,500 · Youth DevelopmentBONDH-E-SHAMS I…HASINA BATLA CHARITABLE TRUST: $49,500 · Youth DevelopmentHASINA BATLA CH…CODEPINK WOMEN FOR PEACE: $100,000 · EducationCODEPINK WO…AJP EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC AMERICAN MUSLIMS FOR PALESTINE: $55,000 · EnvironmentBreakthroughBT Media Inc: $40,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$280,500Civil Rights$212,500International$170,000Youth Development$139,000Education$100,000Environment$55,000Arts & Culture$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: $137,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetA JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE: $115,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCODEPINK WOMEN FOR PEACE: $100,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetBONDH-E-SHAMS INC: $89,500 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetAJP EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC AMERICAN MUSLIMS FOR PALESTINE: $55,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetEducation For Just Peace in Middle East: $55,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBreakthroughBT Media Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCAIR-FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMUSLIM LEGAL FUND OF AMERICA: $37,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetElectronic Frontier Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation…Network for GoodPaypal Charitable Giv…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Pfizer Foundation IncNY12.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yoosufani Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yoosufani Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Yoosufani Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home