Skip to content
Yearley Family Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Yearley Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$283k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$405kHousing & Shelter$200kHuman Services$185kHealth$140kEmployment$85kYouth Development$65kInternational$15kRecreation & Sports$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$7,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MA GENERAL HOSPITAL CANCER CENTER$100,000
BEVERLY BOOTSTRAPS COMMUNITY SERVICES$50,000
WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE$35,000
WIN INC - WOMEN IN NEED INC$25,000
EPISCOPAL ACADEMY$25,000
SARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$15,000
BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY$7,500
KEAN UNIVERSITY$7,500
URBAN PROMISE INTERNATIONAL$5,000
BELIEVE BIG$5,000
AMAZING MUTTS PUPPY RESCUE LLC$2,500
TREVOR PROJECT$2,500
SMART RECOVERY USA$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $178k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $80k → 17%SMART RECOVERY USA: $3k → 9%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $60k → 17%YOUTH SHELTER PROGRAM OF WESTCHESTER: $15k → 9%TEAK FELLOWSHIP: $20k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
MD
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$725k · 9 repeat orgs$378k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
18

Total granted

$725k
$210k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+41%

Still filing today

78%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $168k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthCivil RightsPhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WOMEN IN NEED INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $200k · revenue +33%
  • BEVERLY BOOTSTRAPS COMMUNITY SERVICES I
    2× · 2023–2024 · $90k · revenue +27%
  • EA
    Episcopal Academy
    3× · 2021–2024 · $70k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • WC
    Westchester Comminuty College Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $40k
  • HN
    HORIZONS NEW YORK CITYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +34%
  • TT
    THE TEAK FELLOWSHIP INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +69%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
3
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
4
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
7
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
8
Widener University

Empowering our community of learners to discover and create better futures.

Education
9
Ie New York College

(see schedule o)

Education
10
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
11
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
12
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Incorporated of New York City; the most unlike its peers is Amazing Mutts Puppy Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $150,000 · OtherWESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGEMA GENERAL HOSPITAL CANCER CENTER: $100,000 · OtherMA GENERAL HOSPITAL CANCER CENTERWestchester Comminuty College Foundation: $40,000 · OtherWestchester Comminuty College FoundationWIN INC - WOMEN IN NEED INC: $25,000 · OtherHORIZONS NEW YORK CITY: $25,000 · Other+16 more: $137,500 · Other+16 moreWOMEN IN NEED INC: $200,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN IN NEED INCTHE TEAK FELLOWSHIP INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE TEAK FELLOWSHIP INCYOUTH SHELTER PROGRAM OF WESTCHESTER INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH SHELTER PROGRAM OF…+1 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesEpiscopal Academy: $70,000 · EducationEpiscopal …FAMILY LIFE ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS: $15,000 · EducationFAMILY LIF…The New School: $5,000 · EducationWASHINGTON COLLEGE: $5,000 · EducationKEAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationBEVERLY BOOTSTRAPS COMMUNITY SERVICES I: $90,000 · Community ImprovementBEVERLY B…GREYSTON FOUNDATION INC: $85,000 · PhilanthropyWESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $55,000 · HealthBelieve Big Inc: $5,000 · HealthGIRLS INCORPORATED OF NEW YORK CITY: $50,000 · Civil RightsTREVOR PROJECT INC: $2,500 · Civil Rights
Other$477,500Human Services$237,500Education$100,000Community Improvement$90,000Philanthropy$85,000Health$60,000Civil Rights$52,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWOMEN IN NEED INC: $200,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBEVERLY BOOTSTRAPS COMMUNITY SERVICES I: $90,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetGREYSTON FOUNDATION INC: $85,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetEpiscopal Academy: $70,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $55,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF NEW YORK CITY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHORIZONS NEW YORK CITY: $25,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetTHE TEAK FELLOWSHIP INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY LIFE ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH SHELTER PROGRAM OF WESTCHESTER INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetURBANPROMISE INTERNATIONAL: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe New School: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBelieve Big Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetKEAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmazing Mutts Puppy Rescue: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMART RECOVERY USA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundat…The Bank of America C…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Blackbaud Giving …Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA11× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yearley Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yearley Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Yearley Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home