Skip to content

· Private foundation

Yasha Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$84k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$102kHuman Services$74kYouth Development$20kHealth$11kEducation$7kInternational$550Other$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$261k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SIOUXLAND YOUTH FOR CHRIST$20,000
Individual grant recipient$10,002
HER HEALTH$10,000
AGAPE SERVICES$10,000
ASSEMBLIES OF GOD$9,100
TIME TO REVIVE$6,000
THE GOSPEL MISSION$5,000
MORNINGSIDE UNIVERSITY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$2,400
WYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS$1,950
MANN INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES$1,200
HOUSE OF MISSIONS AND EQUIPPING$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $59k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GOSPEL MISSION: $50k → 13%GOSPEL MISSION: $9k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
SD
IA
MO
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

36%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$111k · 6 repeat orgs$197k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
17

Total granted

$111k
$119k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
0%

Still filing today

33%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $79k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GOSPEL MISSION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $64k · revenue -2%
  • YF
    YOUTH FOR CHRIST
    2× · 2023–2024 · $25k
  • AW
    AG WORLD MISSIONS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $15k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $40k
  • S
    SEE
    one grant, 2018 · $33k
  • HH
    HER HEALTH WOMENS CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $11k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Olivet University

Providing guality Christian education to the network generation

Education
2
Great Commission Media Ministries-Usa

Non-denominational missions organization taking the gospel to russia, asia and middle east using television, radio and the internet. also ministering to churches throughout the united states.

Religion
3
Reformed Mission Services

To mobilize the body of Christ to demonstrate Christs compassion through local churches for the advancement of the gospel. We desire to prepare church members as the body of Christ to be ready to serve by equipping them and providing…

Health
4
Manna University

Manna University is a biblical higher education institution dedicated to educating, equipping, and empowering emerging leaders to change the world.

Education
5
Tyndale Bible Translators

Bible Translation and acts of Christian Services

Religion
6
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
7
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
8
Reconciliation Ministries International Inc

Reconciliaton Ministries Intl. is a Christian evangelical organization preaching and teaching the Word of God in over 60 countries. The ministry equips and encourages Christians everywhere to be saved, healed, and delivered according to…

Religion
9
Manny Arango Ministries Inc

Promote Gods word through understanding the Bible

Religion
10
Probe Ministries International

To present the gospel by providing life-long opportunities to integrate faith and learning through balanced, biblically based scholarship, training people to love god by renewing their minds and equipping the church to engage the world for…

Religion
11
Hr Ministry Solutions Inc

Simplifying ministry HR through education, expertise and specialized services so that churches can grow a healthy and thriving staff.

Religion
12
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Gospel Mission; the most unlike its peers is Mann International Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
0/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSEE: $33,225 · OtherSEEYOUTH FOR CHRIST: $25,000 · OtherYOUTH FOR CHRISTAG WORLD MISSIONS: $14,800 · OtherAG WORLD MISSIONSHER HEALTH WOMENS CENTER: $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,002 · OtherHER HEALTH: $10,000 · OtherKYLEE OR SABRINA LANGSETH: $10,000 · OtherAGAPE SERVICES: $10,000 · OtherTHE GENERAL COUNCIL OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GOD: $9,100 · Other+18 more: $37,712 · Other+18 moreTHE GOSPEL MISSION: $64,000 · Human ServicesTHE GOSPEL MISSIONSIOUXLAND YOUTH FOR CHRIST: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentA Time to Revive: $6,000 · ReligionWycliffe Bible Translators International Inc: $1,920 · ReligionHOUSE OF MISSIONS AND EQUIPPING: $1,000 · ReligionMORNINGSIDE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · Education
Other$210,339Human Services$64,000Youth Development$20,000Religion$8,920Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE GOSPEL MISSION: $64,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetSIOUXLAND YOUTH FOR CHRIST: $20,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetHER HEALTH WOMENS CENTER: $10,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMORNINGSIDE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWycliffe Bible Translators International Inc: $1,920 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOUSE OF MISSIONS AND EQUIPPING: $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE GOSPEL MISSION ↗
  • Who funds SIOUXLAND YOUTH FOR CHRIST ↗
  • Who funds HER HEALTH WOMENS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds A Time to Revive ↗
  • Who funds MORNINGSIDE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Wycliffe Bible Translators International Inc ↗
  • Who funds MANN INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF MISSIONS AND EQUIPPING ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Renaissance Charitable Foundation IncIN10.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yasha Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yasha Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Yasha Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Yasha Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Yasha’s filings →

    More from the funding graph