· Private foundation
Khalid E Parekh Foundation Inc
PROMOTION AND RELIEF OF THE POOR AND UNPRIVILEGED Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k20 grants · $76k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $133k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $120k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INSTITUTE OF KNOWLEDGE | $60,000 |
| ISLAMIC RELIEF | $60,000 |
| FRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL | $26,500 |
| BEGUM AISHA BAWANY TALEEM UL QURAN TRUST | $12,700 |
| UNITY INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION | $12,500 |
| ABDUL LATIF ASIF SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM | $11,588 |
| ISLAMIC CENTER OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY | $10,200 |
| HIDDEN HUMANITY IN 071824-HIDDEN | $10,000 |
| IMRAN KHAN CANCER APEAL | $10,000 |
| MHEF | $10,000 |
| SABA HOMES | $10,000 |
| DIGNITY FOUNDATION 0000003068 | $10,000 |
| YUP 0000003090 | $10,000 |
| KIRAN FOUNDATION USA | $9,670 |
| AKHUWAT USA | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 83% of grant dollars ($486k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 17% that went abroad ($98k) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Beyond the US — 17% of all-years giving ($98k)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $168k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IRISLAMIC RELIEF USA2× · 2022–2024 · $125k · revenue +14%
- IOINSTITUTE OF KNOWLEDGE2× · 2022–2024 · $76k
- IKIMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC2× · 2022–2024 · $20k · revenue +45%
Funded once
- AFAMHREEN FOUNDATION TRUSTone grant, 2022 · $44k
- UFUNITY FOUNDATION INTERNATIONALone grant, 2022 · $22k
FRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INCone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -5%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide food and shelter to the poor people of pakistan
Orphan care, shelter, food, education and medical for orphans and children of poverty locations
Healthcare for people in need.
To reduce poverty in Pakistan by empowering poor and underprivileged people.
Help disabled women and children in pakistan
Develop long-term developmental projects aimed at providing a sustainable living for poor communities as well as supporting needy widows and orphans
To provide healthcare to children that cannot afford health care.
Assisting financially challenged patients with life threatening emergency medical conditions. It also helps building charitable healthcare clinics free schools building and running orphanages and provide scholarships to poor needy students…
Our mission is to reduce the burden of infectious and communicable diseases in Pakistan through capacity building of healthcare providers, and by educating people about preventive and precautionary mechanisms. We strive to break the chain…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Imran Khan Cancer Appeal Inc and the most unlike its peers is Muhsen. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ISLAMIC RELIEF USA ↗
- Who funds IMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds Kiran Foundation-US ↗
- Who funds UPLIFT CHARITY CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds AKHUWAT USA ↗
- Who funds CHILDLIFE FOUNDATION AMERICA I ↗
- Who funds Share To Care Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Muhsen ↗
- Who funds Al-Shifa Clinic Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Yaqub Family Foundation · American Muslim Community Foundation · Rauf & Azeem Foundation Inc · Ms Khan Family Foundation Inc · Baker Hughes Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Shell USA Company Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Khalid E Parekh Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.