Skip to content
Yakima Rotary Charities at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Yakima Rotary Charities

To provide grants to fund rotary projects within the community and to other organizations that are designated as a 501(c)3 organization by the internal revenue service.

$199k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$1.3MFood & Nutrition$233kPhilanthropy$68kHousing & Shelter$65kHuman Services$54kHealth$23kArts & Culture$6kYouth Development$5k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $61,328, the rows itemized in this filing. The $199,445 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $138,117 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $42k
$6,403
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORP$22,396
OPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER OF WA$19,723
SELAH FOOD BANK$6,403
YAKIMA ROTARY FOOD BANK$6,403
ST VINCENT CENTER FOOD BANK$6,403
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILDREN OF THE NATIONS: $12k → 10%YMCA YAKIMA: $462k → 17%YMCA YAKIMA: $356k → 17%YMCA Yakima: $276k → 17%YMCA YAKIMA: $188k → 17%YMCA YAKIMA: $7k → 17%OPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER OF WA: $20k → 17%OPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER OF WA: $13k → 17%OPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER OF WA: $11k → 17%OPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER OF WA: $10k → 17%OPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER OF WA: $6k → 17%OPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER OF WASHINGTON: $6k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 8 repeat orgs$83k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
10

Total granted

$1.6M
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+7%

Still filing today

88%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsHealthEducationArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $1.3M · revenue +4%
  • RH
    ROD'S HOUSE
    2× · 2019–2020 · $65k · revenue +139%
  • OI
    OPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER OF WASHINGTON
    6× · 2018–2025 · $65k · revenue +125%

Funded once

  • CO
    CHILDREN OF THE NATIONS
    one grant, 2020 · $12k · revenue +7%
  • TR
    THE ROTARY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $11k
  • CB
    Canyon Blooms Petals For Patients
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Young Women's Christian Association of Bellingham

YWCA Bellingham is part of a national network of programs with the shared mission of eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, and freedom for all.

Human Services
2
Wakulima Usa

Our Food Production Center will serve as our primary storage production and distribution facility. The coop will aggregate purchase store and distribute farm inputs for members and will act as an integrator collecting the output from…

Food & Nutrition
3
United Territories of Pacific Islanders Washington-Utopia Wa

We are actively replacing systems of oppression with ecosystems of care and safety for all our communities through Black and Brown organizing, prioritizing land and bodily autonomy, and reclaiming our cultural narratives.

Human Services
4
Young Men's Christian Association of the Inland Northwest

The mission of the YMCA of the Inland Northwest is to put Christian Principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. The YMCA of the Inland Northwest is a diverse organization of men, women and…

—
5
Love in the Name of Christ of Yakima

The mission of Love in The Name of Christ of Yakima is to empower families to break out of poverty and live in spiritual, personal, and financial freedom by linking them with trained volunteers from a network of 26+ local churches.We…

Community Improvement
6
Rimrock Trails Treatment Services

To improve the lives of those struggling with mental health and/or substance use by providing timely access to compassionate and effective behavioral healthcare.

Health
7
Dispute Resolution Center

The drc of yakima and kittitas counties is part of an association of 21 drc's inwa state. we provide services and training for people to resolve disputes peacefully with a goal of building strong, compassionate and peaceful families,…

Crime & Legal
8
Youth Empowerment Shelter

To provide youth in crisis a place of physical and emotional safety while assisting them to build positive relationships and develop their individual potentials.

Youth Development
9
Elevate Youth Services Inc

Elevate's mission is to promote safety, competence, and confidence as youth create their path through adolescence and into adulthood.elevate provides a wide range of innovative and effective programs that empower and enrich the lives of…

Human Services
10
Jamhi Health & Wellness Inc

We provide a comprehensive, co occurring disorder-capable, community behavioral health center. we provide quality care using best practices designed to promote health, wellness, self-determination, and recovery. the service area is the…

Health
11
Yakima Neighborhood Health Services

To improve the quality of life in our communities by providing accessible and integrated health and social services, ending homelessness, and offering unique learning opportunities for students of health professions.

Health
12
Youthcare

Youthcare works to end youth homelessness and to ensure that young people are valued for who they are and empowered to achieve their potential.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yakima Valley Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Artfarm. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $1,289,258 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONOPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER OF WASHINGTON: $64,834 · Human Services+1 more: $11,926 · Human ServicesSALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORP: $144,806 · OtherSALVATION ARMY…Yakima Rotary Food Bank: $22,200 · OtherYakima Rotary …CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF YAKIMA: $17,200 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARI…UNION GOSPEL MISSION OF YAKIMA WASH: $13,644 · OtherUNION GOSPEL M…THE ROTARY FOUNDATION: $10,500 · Other+4 more: $24,049 · Other+4 moreROD'S HOUSE: $64,875 · Housing & ShelterYAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyCanyon Blooms Petals For Patients: $10,000 · PhilanthropyYAKIMA VALLEY COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM: $16,000 · HealthPRIME TIME: $6,000 · HealthWILLIAM O DOUGLAS TRAIL FOUNDATION: $8,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE YAKIMA YOUTH GOLF ORGANIZATION: $5,977 · Recreation & SportsSelah-Naches Food Bank: $6,403 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$1,366,018Other$232,399Housing & Shelter$64,875Philanthropy$60,000Health$22,000Recreation & Sports$13,977Food & Nutrition$6,403

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $1,289,258 over 5y, 5.2% of budgetROD'S HOUSE: $64,875 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetOPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER OF WASHINGTON: $64,834 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetYAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYakima Rotary Food Bank: $22,200 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF YAKIMA: $17,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYAKIMA VALLEY COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM: $16,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN OF THE NATIONS: $11,926 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCanyon Blooms Petals For Patients: $10,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetWILLIAM O DOUGLAS TRAIL FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL WASHINGTON: $7,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPRIME TIME: $6,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE YAKIMA YOUTH GOLF ORGANIZATION: $5,977 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetARTFARM: $5,800 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetIMAGINE SCHOLAR INC: $5,006 over 1y, 2.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Yakima Valley Communi…United Way of Central…Northwest Harvest EmmThe Lee and Kay Peter…Yakima Valley Memoria…Second Harvest Inland…Casey Family ProgramsLamb Weston Charitabl…Seattle FoundationMorgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…
Yakima Valley Community FoundationWA24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Yakima Valley Community Foundation · United Way of Central Washington · Northwest Harvest Emm · The Lee and Kay Peterson Family Foundation Inc · Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Association · Second Harvest Inland Northwest · Casey Family Programs · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yakima Rotary Charities funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yakima Rotary Charities. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Yakima Rotary Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home