Skip to content

· Public charity

Yad Chaya Inc

Yad chaya supports religious communities by providing financial assistance to qualifying exempt organizations & needy individuals in the form of food, clothing, shelter & psychological support.

$3.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$222k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$2.8MInternational$1.2MHealth$190kFood & Nutrition$123kHuman Services$80kEducation$60kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kPhilanthropy$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $425,101, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,075,369 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,650,268 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $142k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $275k
$19,600
Median grant
3
States reached
$709k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KOLLEL INTERNATIONAL INC$222,456
CONG AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED$52,877
VARIOUS US ORGANIZATIONS$42,943
TOMCHEI TORAH MONSEY$41,225
AVOS UBANIM$19,600
KEREN YEHOSHUA VYISROEL$18,000
SCOTTSDALE TORAH CENTER$10,000
YAD ELIEZER$10,000
KEREN TORAH VECHESED INC$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $212k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $10k → 6%AFOPEY: $20k → 17%YAD ELIEZER: $122k → 11%YAD ELIEZER: $10k → 11%OHEL CHILDRENS HOME: $25k → 20%OHEL CHILDRENS HOME: $25k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $2.6M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region, $1.7M to organizations and $996k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$2.6M · 100% · 1 grant · 264 people

Stated purpose: CHARITABLE · CHARITABLE GRANTS

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.1M · 16 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +7% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
34

Total granted

$4.1M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+3%

Still filing today

50%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalEducationPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $136k · revenue +7%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $132k · revenue +20%
  • OC
    Ohel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $50k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • BC
    BAYIT CHAM
    one grant, 2023 · $160k · revenue -67% · 43% of their budget
  • OG
    OHR GEDALIAH INC
    one grant, 2023 · $123k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF NACHLAS SHIMON
    one grant, 2020 · $115k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
3
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
4
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
5
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
6
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
7
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
8
Sherit Isroel
—
9
Yeshiva Beit Rafael

Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.

Philanthropy
10
Or Yechiel

Award grants to promote torah study

Religion
11
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
12
Meir Isa Bracha Inc

To help establish and maintain agendas for Hebrew and religious enlightenment

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Iyun Haparsha Inc; the most unlike its peers is International Aae Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
12/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION SUPPORTERS OF TO: $1,123,864 · OtherCONGREGATION SUPPORTERS OF TOKOLLEL INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,054,904 · OtherKOLLEL INTERNATIONAL INCIndividual grant recipient: $391,451 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INC: $335,993 · OtherCONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INCYAD ELIEZER: $174,232 · OtherVARIOUS US ORGANIZATIONS: $158,488 · Other+27 more: $769,086 · Other+27 moreMACHON BETH MEIR: $180,500 · PhilanthropyMACHON BET…BAYIT CHAM: $160,000 · PhilanthropyBAYIT CHAMOHR GEDALIAH INC: $122,507 · PhilanthropyOHR GEDALI…TOMCHEI TORAH B'ERETZ YISRAEL INC TOMCHEI TORAH B'ERET: $41,225 · PhilanthropyTOMCHEI TO…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $132,000 · Human ServicesOhel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc: $50,000 · Human ServicesAFOPEY: $20,000 · Human ServicesDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesIYUN HAPARSHA INC: $106,806 · ReligionTORAS HAMISHPACHA TAHAREINU: $37,000 · ReligionAVOS UBANIM: $24,700 · ReligionNEFESH YEHUDIE INC: $21,200 · ReligionTHE AFIKIM FOUNDATION: $12,000 · Religion+1 more: $6,000 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $136,000 · InternationalKEREN TORAH VCHESED: $16,000 · InternationalKEREN YEHOSHUA V'YISROEL: $105,000 · EducationTZEVET HATZOLAH EMERGENCY RESPONSE: $50,000 · Public Safety & DisasterPROJECT YECHI INC: $20,000 · HealthAMUDIM COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $10,000 · Health
Other$4,008,018Philanthropy$504,232Human Services$212,000Religion$207,706International$152,000Education$105,000Public Safety & Disaster$50,000Health$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMACHON BETH MEIR: $180,500 over 2y, 10% of budgetBAYIT CHAM: $160,000 over 1y, 43% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $136,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $132,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetOHR GEDALIAH INC: $122,507 over 1y, 12% of budgetIYUN HAPARSHA INC: $106,806 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetKEREN YEHOSHUA V'YISROEL: $105,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetMasoret Yehudit: $50,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetTZEVET HATZOLAH EMERGENCY RESPONSE: $50,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetOhel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOMCHEI TORAH B'ERETZ YISRAEL INC TOMCHEI TORAH B'ERET: $41,225 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTORAS HAMISHPACHA TAHAREINU: $37,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetTORAH ACADEMY OF BERGEN COUNTY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAVOS UBANIM: $24,700 over 2y, 24% of budgetNEFESH YEHUDIE INC: $21,200 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPROJECT YECHI INC: $20,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetKEREN TORAH VCHESED: $16,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE AFIKIM FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF NEVE COLLEGE FOR WOMEN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL AAE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAMUDIM COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA WOLOZIN BNEI BRAK ISRAEL INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MACHON BETH MEIR ↗
  • Who funds BAYIT CHAM ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER ↗
  • Who funds OHR GEDALIAH INC ↗
  • Who funds IYUN HAPARSHA INC ↗
  • Who funds KEREN YEHOSHUA V'YISROEL ↗
  • Who funds Masoret Yehudit ↗
  • Who funds TZEVET HATZOLAH EMERGENCY RESPONSE ↗
  • Who funds Ohel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds TOMCHEI TORAH B'ERETZ YISRAEL INC TOMCHEI TORAH B'ERET ↗
  • Who funds TORAS HAMISHPACHA TAHAREINU ↗
  • Who funds TORAH ACADEMY OF BERGEN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds AVOS UBANIM ↗
  • Who funds NEFESH YEHUDIE INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT YECHI INC ↗
  • Who funds AFOPEY ↗
  • Who funds KEREN TORAH VCHESED ↗
  • Who funds THE AFIKIM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY32.3× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Ays Tzedakah Foundation · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · Fjc · The Levitin Family Charitable Trust · Bcg Charitable Foundation · Cambridge Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yad Chaya Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yad Chaya Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Torah Academy of Bergen County: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Yad Chaya Inc?

Find your warmest path to Yad Chaya Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Yad Chaya’s filings →

More from the funding graph