Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Xenon Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$97kReligion$28kPhilanthropy$17kArts & Culture$10kRecreation & Sports$3kHealth$950International$703Environment$603Other$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$96k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$5,596
SIMMONS UNIVERSITY$4,750
YALE UNIVERSITY$1,000
MAD RIVER PATH ASSOCIATION$500
STOWE PERFORMING ARTS$215
MAD RIVER VALLEY ARTS ASSOCIATION$180
VERMONT PUBLIC RADIO$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $193) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CENTER OF HOPE FOUNDATION: $50 → 11%MAD RIVER VALLEY AMBULANCE SERVICES: $143 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
IL
NY
MA
CT
RI
CA
UT
VA
NC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$65k · 19 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
35

Total granted

$65k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+41%

Still filing today

42%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $215 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsHealthHuman ServicesAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Chicago
    2× · 2017–2019 · $10k · revenue +56%
  • MR
    MAD RIVER PATH ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2019–2025 · $603 · revenue +76%
  • MR
    MAD RIVER VALLEY ARTS INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $331 · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BELL HOUSE
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
  • BH
    BROOKLYN HEIGHTS SYNAGOGUE
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
3
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
4
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
5
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
6
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education
7
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
8
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

9
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
10
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
11
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

12
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Simmons University and the most unlike its peers is Pawsitive Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Land Conservation Organizat…Community Arts OrganizationsClassical Music EnsemblesVolunteer Fire DepartmentsGovernment Accountability R…Animal Rescue and AdoptionDevelopmental Disabilities …Cancer Support OrganizationsYouth Ice Hockey ProgramsJewish Community Federations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 57 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr20%7%10–20yr19%21%20–35yr14%17%35–55yr14%52%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr19%1%20–35yr14%1%35–55yr14%98%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
11%
4,714/42,323

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
23/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Massachusetts Institute of Technology — $54,300 · EducationMassachusetts Institute of TechnologySIMMONS UNIVERSITY — $24,575 · EducationSIMMONS UNIVERSITYUniversity of Chicago — $10,000 · EducationUniversity of Chicago+3 more — $266 · EducationTEMPLE BETH TORAH — $21,505 · OtherTEMPLE BETH TORAHTHE BELL HOUSE — $6,283 · OtherTHE BELL HOUSEBROOKLYN HEIGHTS SYNAGOGUE — $5,500 · OtherBROOKLYN HEIGHTS SYNAGOGUEIndividual grant recipient — $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYALE UNIVERSITY — $4,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYYALE UNIVERSITY — $2,000 · Other+35 more — $5,842 · Other+35 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARTFORD — $16,629 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDE…United States Ski Team Foundation — $2,437 · Recreation & SportsCALIFORNIA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION — $100 · Recreation & SportsMAD RIVER VALLEY ARTS INC — $331 · Arts & CultureNEW BRITAIN MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART INC — $320 · Arts & CultureWADSWORTH ATHENEUM MUSEUM OF ART — $225 · Arts & CultureSTOWE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $215 · Arts & CultureCONNECTICUT RADIO INFORMATION SYSTEM INC — $100 · Arts & CultureVERMONT PUBLIC CO — $60 · Arts & CultureJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $500 · InternationalAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $150 · HealthTHE JACKSON LABORATORY — $125 · Health
Education$89,141Other$49,130Philanthropy$16,629Recreation & Sports$2,537Arts & Culture$1,251International$500Health$275

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $54,300 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSIMMONS UNIVERSITY — $24,575 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARTFORD — $16,629 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Ski Team Foundation — $2,437 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YALE CLUB OF NEW YORK CITY — $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAD RIVER PATH ASSOCIATION — $603 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAD RIVER VALLEY ARTS INC — $331 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEW BRITAIN MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART INC — $320 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVermont Public Radio — $260 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWADSWORTH ATHENEUM MUSEUM OF ART — $225 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMusic Mountain Incorporated — $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRensselaer Polytechnic Institute — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAD RIVER VALLEY AMBULANCE SERVICE INC — $143 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JACKSON LABORATORY — $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT RADIO INFORMATION SYSTEM INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Community of Greater Stowe — $90 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY — $52 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER OF HOPE FOUNDATION INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAD RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY FUND INC — $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD — $14 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amica Companies FoundationRI14.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amica Companies Foundation · Marks Family Foundation · Jmz Charitable Foundation Inc · The Winthrop H Smith Jr Charitable Foundation Inc · Deborah and Robert First Family Foundation · Sandra & Arnold Chase Family Foundation Inc · Sbm Charitable Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Xenon Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Center of Hope Foundation Inc74% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology35% of income from government
  • Brandeis University9% of income from government
  • New Britain Museum of American Art Inc7% of income from government
  • Wadsworth Atheneum Museum of Art5% of income from government
  • Mad River Path Association2% of income from government
  • University of Hartford1% of income from government
  • Simmons University1% of income from government
  • Vermont Public Co0% of income from government
  • Music Mountain Incorporated0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph