· Private foundation
Jmz Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k40 grants · $41k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $261k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $101,000 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER | $100,000 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM | $60,000 |
| SOLOMON SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL | $45,000 |
| THE UNIVERSTIY OF CONNECTICUT | $15,000 |
| PENN LIBRARIES FUND | $10,000 |
| BRRH FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL | $5,000 |
| UCONN HILLEL | $5,000 |
| KESHET INC | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| BOCA RATON MUSEUM OF ART INC | $2,130 |
| ARMORY ART CENTER INC | $1,500 |
| NORTON MUSEUM OF ART | $1,250 |
| ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE | $1,200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.
64 repeat relationships — 39 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC5× · 2018–2022 · $553k · revenue +102%
- SSSOLOMON SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL OF GREATER HARTFORD INC2× · 2023–2024 · $85k · revenue +28%
- BRBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc2× · 2017–2023 · $30k · revenue +67%
Funded once
- DGDIGNITY GROWS INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +52%
- SSSOSone grant, 2017 · $35k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $35k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).
The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The new england air museum's mission is to preserve and present the story of aviation and aerospace, with an emphasis on new england's role, and the genius and inspiration that made it possible. the museum also seeks to inspire young…
The Frick Collection (the "Collection") operates an internationally recognized art museum and library program for the inspiration and enjoyment of the public and for the advancement of the study of fine arts and kindred subjects.
To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.
The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…
The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The mission of the national academy of design is to promote the fine arts in america through exhibition and education.
See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc and the most unlike its peers is Edinburgh International Festival Usa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 108 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARTFORD ↗
- Who funds DIGNITY GROWS INC ↗
- Who funds SOLOMON SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL OF GREATER HARTFORD INC ↗
- Who funds Boca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Boca Raton Regional Hospital Inc ↗
- Who funds KESHET INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARMORY ART CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds URBANGLASS NEW YORK CONTEMPORARY GLASS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHAPEL & YORK US FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BOCA RATON MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds EDINBURGH INTERNATIONAL FESTIVAL USA INC ↗
- Who funds BOCA WEST CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION FKA BOCA WEST COMMUNITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT CITIZEN RESEARCH GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds BEYOND NINE CAT RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Zachs Family Foundation Inc · Cheryl Chase & Stuart Bear Family Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · Sandra & Arnold Chase Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Hartford Inc · Connecticut Humanities Council Inc · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · Andrew J & Joyce D Mandell Family Foundation Inc · The Auerbach Schiro Foundation · Amica Companies Foundation · Rhoda & David Chase Family Foundation Inc · Burton & Phyllis Hoffman Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jmz Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Garde Arts Center Inc — 10% of income from government
- New Britain Museum of American Art Inc — 7% of income from government
- Wadsworth Atheneum Museum of Art — 5% of income from government
- Florida Sheriffs Association Inc — 4% of income from government
- Florence Griswold Museum Inc — 2% of income from government
- Solomon Schechter Day School of Greater Hartford Inc — 1% of income from government
- Goodspeed Opera House Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- New England Public Media Inc — 0% of income from government
- Connecticut Citizen Research Group Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Armory Art Center Inc — 0% of income from government
- Keshet Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Jmz Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Jmz Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.