· Public charity
Wyoming County United Way Inc
The mission of the wyoming county united way is to meet the needs and improve the quality of life for the people in wyoming county, pennsylvania
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 21 grants below total $435,262 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $462,263 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $27,001 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $300k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INTERFAITH FRIENDS | $50,000 |
| HANDS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER | $50,000 |
| TUNKHANNOCK PUBLIC LIBRARY | $45,000 |
| FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION | $40,000 |
| CHILD HUNGER OUTREACH PARTNERS | $30,000 |
| WYOMING COUNTY FOOD PANTRY | $28,184 |
| COMMISSION ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY | $25,000 |
| CHILD DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL | $20,007 |
| WYOMING COUNTY CANCER SOCIETY | $20,000 |
| BOY SCOUTS NEPA COUNCIL | $19,480 |
| VICTIMS RESOURCE CENTER | $15,000 |
| NORTHEAST SIGHT SERVICES (GREATER WILKES BARRE ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND) | $14,000 |
| WYOMING SULLIVAN COUNTY TREATMENT PROGRAM | $12,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS NEPA | $11,826 |
| ENDLESS MOUNTAINS DROP IN CENTER | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $945k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 46% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HOHANDS OF WYOMING COUNTY7× · 2019–2025 · $354k · revenue +237%
- IFINTERFAITH FRIENDS7× · 2019–2025 · $318k · revenue +45% · 32% of their budget
- TLTunkhannock Library Association7× · 2019–2025 · $300k · revenue +27%
Funded once
- WCWYOMING COUNTY COMMUNITY ALLIANCEone grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue -45%
- UNUNITED NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERSone grant, 2019 · $10k
- TITREHAB INCone grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue +9%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Program Services to Aging Population in Clearfield County
To prevent victimization, advocate for, and lessen suffering of victims of crime by providing services in a supportive, inclusive, and safe environment in fayette county.
To serve as the primary planning and coordinating body to promote
We provide family planning service to those individuals who ned and request such services. we serve a six county area in western wyoming.
Childrens Aid Society in Clearfield County provides various programs for the welfare of children and families.
The mission of wayne cares is to provide food and other material relief to persons in need, primarily in radnor township.
WYCRP is committed to supporting the safety, permanence, and well-being of children through systematic reviews, education, prevention, and early intervention efforts. As a federally mandated entity, the Citizen Review Panel evaluates the…
We provide programs and services that support and strengthen Doddridge County families through interagency coordination and collaboration. These will be available, easily accessible, and located with in the county.
To provide policy guidance, technical assistance, and program oversight for the city of pittsburgh and allegheny county, and to assist in the economic development of southwestern pa region.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Preventative Aftercare Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wyoming County Special Needs Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 15% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HANDS OF WYOMING COUNTY ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH FRIENDS ↗
- Who funds Tunkhannock Library Association ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds COMMISSION ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY OF LUZERNE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER NEPA ↗
- Who funds CHILD HUNGER OUTREACH PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds VICTIMS RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds PREVENTATIVE AFTERCARE INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER WILKES BARRE ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND D/B/A NORTHEAST SIGHT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds WYOMING-SULLIVAN COUNTY TREATMENT PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds WYOMING COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds Northern Tier Industry and Education Consortium In ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS IN THE HEART OF PA ↗
- Who funds CARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER OF NEPA ↗
- Who funds WYOMING COUNTY COMMUNITY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds WYOMING COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH FOU ↗
- Who funds WYOMING COUNTY CARES ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE DIOCESE OF SCRANTON INC ↗
- Who funds PATRIOTS COVE INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds WYOMING COUNTY SPECIAL NEEDS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF NEPA ↗
- Who funds TREHAB INC ↗
- Who funds SEVEN LOAVES SOUP KITCHEN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Moses Taylor Foundation Inc · Scranton Area Foundation Inc · Robert H Spitz Foundation · Allone Charities · Tuscarora Wayne Mutual Foundation · The Luzerne Foundation · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · United Way of Lackawanna Wayne and Pike Counties · United Way of Wyoming Valley · Ppl Foundation · Sordoni Family Foundation · The Tambur Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wyoming County United Way Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.