Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Wyndham Worldwide Charitable Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2018
2
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2018.

Philanthropy$384kInternational$285kHealth$205kRecreation & Sports$195kHuman Services$96kYouth Development$60kFood & Nutrition$50kArts & Culture$38kOther$0
02FY2018 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW JERSEY$25,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHWEST NEW JERSEY$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $44k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%THE FISHING SCHOOL: $5k → 14%FAMILY SERVICES OF THE PIEDMONT: $3k → 16%CORNERSTONE FAMILY PROGRAMS: $10k → 4%THE GLEASON INITIATIVE FOUNDATION: $1k → 23%BACKPACK BEGINNINGS: $25k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
NJ
CT
CA
NC
SC
DC
LA
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Carolina Network of Children's Advocacy Centers

Empowering south carolina communities and children's advocacy centers to deliver a best practice response to child abuse

Youth Development
2
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
3
Advocates for Children of New Jersey

To identify children's needs through research, policy and legal analysis, to raise awareness of those needs through strategic communications, and to work with elected officials and other decision-makers to enact effective responses.

Human Services
4
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
5
Oncology and Kids Inc

To help kids and families heal the emotional scars of childhood cancer and learn to thrive.

Human Services
6
Advocates for Children Inc Casa of the Sabine Neches Region

Advocacy for abused children

Civil Rights
7
Georgia Alliance for Breast Cancer F/K/a It's the Journey

Georgia alliance for breast cancer mission is to engage with georgia's breast cancer community to increase access to care and reduce disparities in cancer outcomes.

Health
8
Families Together in New York State Inc

Establish a unified voice for children and youth with emotional, behavioral, and social challenges. the organizational mission is to ensure that every family has access to needed information, support, and services.

Human Services
9
The Children's Law Center

To provide legal services to indigent children in contested custody/ visitation and related cases.

Crime & Legal
10
The Bridge Family Center Inc

To foster the courage and strength in children and families to meet life's challenges and build fulfilling lives serving new haven, hartford and tolland counties.

—
11
The Bridge Project Inc

The bridge project, inc. (the organization") is a non-profit organization that seeks to solve child poverty in the united states. launched in june 2021 by the monarch foundation, it is new york's first consistent unconditional cash…

Philanthropy
12
Advocates for Children Inc

Our new mission is: advocates for children is an organization of dedicated, skilled professionals and compassionate volunteers committed to the well-being of children, youth and families. through comprehensive advocacy and unwavering…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Zebra Youth Inc and the most unlike its peers is Piedmont Triad Charitable Foundation D/B/a Wyndham Championship. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Sports Booster Organi…Youth Development CentersChild and Family ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Jewish Community FederationsLgbtq+ Community CentersCommunity Health CentersDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Community Arts OrganizationsLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…United Way FederationsPublic University Foundatio…Substance Abuse TreatmentFood Pantries & AssistanceCancer Support Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%26%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%32%35–55yr16%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%11%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr16%56%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/33
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,532

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
26/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PIEDMONT TRIAD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION D/B/A WYNDHAM CHAMPIONSHIP — $350,000 · OtherPIEDMONT TRIAD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION D/B/A WYNDHAM CHAMPIONSHI…SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW JERSEY INC — $50,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW JERSEY INCAMERICAN HOTEL & LODGING FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherAMERICAN HOTEL & LODGING FOUNDATION+24 more — $315,550 · Other+24 moreSave The Children Federation Inc — $250,000 · InternationalSave The Children Fede…ECPAT-USA INC — $20,000 · InternationalECPAT-USA INCGOLF FORE FUN INC — $105,000 · Recreation & SportsGOLF FORE …American Junior Golf Association Inc — $25,000 · Recreation & SportsAmerican J…THE JACK AND JILL LATE STAGE CANCER FOUNDATION — $25,000 · HealthSERIOUSFUN CHILDREN'S NETWORK — $25,000 · HealthSHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $15,000 · HealthNewbridge Services Inc — $15,000 · HealthSHEPHERD'S HOPE INC — $12,500 · HealthABC OF NC FOUNDATION — $5,000 · HealthBACKPACK BEGINNINGS — $25,000 · Human ServicesJERSEY BATTERED WOMEN'S SERVICE INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesCORNERSTONE FAMILY PROGRAMS — $10,000 · Human ServicesThe Fishing School Inc — $5,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC — $2,500 · Human Services+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 · Public Safety & DisasterUNITED WAY OF GREATER HIGH POINT INC — $25,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $9,250 · Philanthropy
Other$765,550International$270,000Recreation & Sports$130,000Health$97,500Human Services$58,500Public Safety & Disaster$35,000Philanthropy$34,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPIEDMONT TRIAD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION D/B/A WYNDHAM CHAMPIONSHIP — $350,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOLF FORE FUN INC — $105,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW JERSEY INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JACK AND JILL LATE STAGE CANCER FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetAmerican Junior Golf Association Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSERIOUSFUN CHILDREN'S NETWORK — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBACKPACK BEGINNINGS — $25,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetSTOCKTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER HIGH POINT INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKIND INC — $23,550 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetECPAT-USA INC — $20,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHWEST NEW JERSEY INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEW JERSEY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER CORPORATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJERSEY BATTERED WOMEN'S SERVICE INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNewbridge Services Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHEPHERD'S HOPE INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetZEBRA YOUTH INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCORNERSTONE FAMILY PROGRAMS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $9,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALIGHT INC — $5,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetThe Fishing School Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL HISPANIC BUSINESS GROUP — $5,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Piedmont Triad Charit…Amg Charitable Gift F…McInnis Family Founda…Duke Energy FoundationColumbia Bank Foundat…The Hyde and Watson F…Charities Aid Foundat…Foundation for the Ca…The Blackbaud Giving …Gs Donor Advised Phil…Enterprise Holdings F…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…
Piedmont Triad Charitable Foundation D/B/A Wyndham ChampionshipNC15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Piedmont Triad Charitable Foundation D/B/A Wyndham Championship · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · McInnis Family Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Columbia Bank Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Foundation for the Carolinas · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Wyndham Worldwide Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Jersey Battered Women's Service Inc — 40% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Newbridge Services Inc — 24% of income from government
  • Ywca of Eastern Union County Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Cornerstone Family Programs — 3% of income from government
  • Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation — 2% of income from government
  • New Jersey Performing Arts Center Corporation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Wyndham Worldwide Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Wyndham Worldwide Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home