· Public charity
Ww Good Foundation Inc
Ww good foundation, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k2 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $252k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $86k
- $250k+1 grant · $525k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Feeding America | $524,680 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCORPORATED | $86,344 |
| CH8SING WATERFALLS | $44,872 |
| MIWRC | $34,996 |
| Hike Clerb Inc | $24,000 |
| SISTA AFYA COMMUNITY CARE NFP | $20,000 |
| CITY HARVEST | $19,174 |
| BORDERLAND RAINBOW CENTER | $18,540 |
| Headstrong | $17,116 |
| SAPNA NYC INC | $12,700 |
| FOOD RECOVERY NETWORK | $10,814 |
| GROW ORLANDO INC | $10,000 |
| THE NOTAH BEGAY III FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| LA SEMILLA FOOD CENTER | $10,000 |
| ACTIVE PLUS | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 28%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2022, 1 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $310k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Feeding America3× · 2020–2022 · $2.2M · revenue +40%- HSHEAD STRONG PROJECT INC2× · 2021–2022 · $51k · revenue +26%
- BRBORDERLAND RAINBOW CENTER2× · 2021–2022 · $27k · revenue +51%
Funded once
- TNTHE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUNDone grant, 2020 · $150k · revenue +12%
- FBFULL BELLIES INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +120% · 26% of their budget
HISPANICS IN PHILANTHROPYone grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -79%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Fair food network is organized to grow community health, wealth, and resilience through food, to increase access to affordable healthy food, help local food economies thrive and build resilience in local food and agriculture systems.
Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.
The berkeley food network (bfn) works to expand food assistance services to food-insecure berkeley residents. bfn was founded in 2016 to help establish a foundation of good health from which all berkeley residents can pursue opportunity by…
The nashville food project brings people together to grow, cook, and share nourishing food, with the goals of cultivating community and alleviating hunger in our city.
To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.
The mission of Food & Planet is to empower nutrition professionals to advance sustainable food systems through our programs and resources. Over the past year, we have engaged with partners to develop several key resources and learning…
Foodwise grows thriving communities through the power and joy of local food. We envision a world that nourishes all people, local economies, and the living earth.
The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…
To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.
Food bank for nyc has been the city's major hunger-relief organization driven by our mission to empower every new yorker to achieve food security for good. we harness the collective power of our network of food providers, partners, and…
To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…
To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Semilla Food Center and the most unlike its peers is Borderland Rainbow Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WHOLESOME WAVE INC ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds THE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds HEAD STRONG PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE ↗
- Who funds CH8SING WATERFALLS - EMBR8CE THE CH8SE ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA INDIAN WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds BORDERLAND RAINBOW CENTER ↗
- Who funds HIKE CLERB INC ↗
- Who funds FULL BELLIES INC ↗
- Who funds SISTA AFYA COMMUNITY CARE NFP ↗
- Who funds HISPANICS IN PHILANTHROPY ↗
- Who funds MINNIES FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds GLSEN INC ↗
- Who funds SAPNA NYC INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD RECOVERY NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds LA SEMILLA FOOD CENTER ↗
- Who funds FoodWhat Incorporated ↗
- Who funds ACTIVE PLUS INC ↗
- Who funds THE NOTAH BEGAY III FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO ↗
- Who funds EATWELL EXCHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds Backyard Basecamp Inc ↗
- Who funds PLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ww Good Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ww Good Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Ww Good Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.