Skip to content
Wuslich Family Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx at a glance

· Private foundation

Wuslich Family Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$9k
Granted FY2023
4
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2023.

Philanthropy$14kEducation$8kYouth Development$4kReligion$3kRecreation & Sports$2kCommunity Improvement$2kHealth$1kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2023 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UPPER ARLINGTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION$3,000
Hoosier Trails Council$2,500
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF BLOOMINGTON$2,500
Mahoning Valley Historical Society$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%INDIANA GOLF FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%SUNNYSIDE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $2k → 13%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF BLOOMINGTON: $6k → 18%YOUNGSTOWN FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%UPPER ARLINGTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $3k → 15%YOUNGSTOWN STATE: $10k → 19%SALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORP: $500 → 9%AARC: $1k → 13%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF BLOOMINGTON: $3k → 18%UPPER BEAR BASH: $1k → 15%YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIV FOUNDATION: $5k → 19%SUNNYSIDE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $1k → 13%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 18%Mahoning Valley Historical Society: $1k → 19%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF BLOOMINGTON: $2k → 18%THE ASSOCIATED NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS: $2k → 19%Hoosier Trails Council: $3k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF BLOOMINGTON: $10,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF BLOOMINGTONIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSUNNYSIDE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $3,000 · OtherSUNNYSIDE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHHOOSIER TRAILS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $2,500 · OtherHOOSIER TRAILS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICACOMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATIONTHE ASSOCIATED NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS: $1,500 · Other+3 more: $2,500 · Other+3 moreYOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationYOUNGSTOWN S…UPPER ARLINGTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $3,000 · PhilanthropyUPPER ARLI…YOUNGSTOWN FDN GENERAL: $1,000 · PhilanthropyYOUNGSTOWN…INDIANA GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsMAHONING VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,000 · Arts & CultureBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BLOOMINGTON INC: $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$32,500Education$5,000Philanthropy$4,000Recreation & Sports$1,000Arts & Culture$1,000Youth Development$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUPPER ARLINGTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHOOSIER TRAILS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINDIANA GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAHONING VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNGSTOWN FDN GENERAL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BLOOMINGTON INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA9.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wuslich Family Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wuslich Family Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wuslich Family Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home