Skip to content
Wsp Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Wsp Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$580k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$206k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$868kHousing & Shelter$539kHealth$232kInternational$179kArts & Culture$170kEducation$153kCommunity Improvement$128kEnvironment$105kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $165k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $377k
$10,280
Median grant
10
States reached
$42k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY SEATTLE$206,400
DONATIONS UNDER 5000$61,351
AMERICAN RED CROSS$59,320
GREATER WASHINGTON PARTNERSHIP$50,000
ACEC RESEARCH INSTITUTE$30,000
BRIDGES TO PROSPERITY$30,000
NATIONAL BUILDING MUSEUM$25,000
MEDSTAR HEALTH$15,000
FL EMERGENCY MGMT ASSISTANCE FOUNDA$15,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$10,280
ACE MENTOR PROGRAM OF AMERICA$10,000
WELLSPAN NY HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,000
FRIENDS OF WATERFRONT PARK$10,000
TRANSIT FORWARD$10,000
WATER FOR PEOPLE$8,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC: $5k → 20%AMERICAS WATERSHED INITIATIVE: $5k → 11%SOUTHEAST RALEIGH PROMISE: $5k → 8%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
NY
MA
IA
IN
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
NC
DC
HI
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 26 repeat orgs$673k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
63

Total granted

$2.0M
$568k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+24%

Still filing today

69%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEnvironmentEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $300k · revenue +12%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY SEATTLE-KING COUNTY
    2× · 2020–2025 · $211k · revenue +541%
  • NB
    NATIONAL BUILDING MUSEUM
    5× · 2020–2025 · $150k · revenue +132%

Funded once

  • AC
    ATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE USAINC
    one grant, 2022 · $34k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • OW
    ONE WATER ACADEMY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
2
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
3
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
4
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
6
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
7
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
8
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
9
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
10
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
11
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
12
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Side Center for Community Life; the most unlike its peers is Medical City Dallas Auxiliary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
53/54
Grantees still filing
39/54
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONATIONS UNDER 5000: $633,425 · OtherDONATIONS UNDER 5000HABITAT FOR HUMANITY SEATTLE-KING COUNTY: $211,400 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY SEATTLE-KING COUNTY+67 more: $803,843 · Other+67 moreHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $300,000 · InternationalHABITAT FOR HUMANI…BRIDGES TO PROSPERITY INC: $110,000 · InternationalBRIDGES TO PROSPER…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $34,830 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRON…MARCH OF DIMES INC: $60,000 · HealthMEDSTAR HEALTH INC: $30,000 · HealthBanner Health Foundation: $25,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $17,503 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC: $14,000 · HealthCARROLL HOSPITAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 · HealthATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $11,000 · Health+3 more: $16,000 · HealthNATIONAL BUILDING MUSEUM: $150,000 · Arts & CultureSALVADORI CENTER LTD: $29,350 · Arts & CultureAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $88,130 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,167 · Human ServicesAMERICA'S WATERSHED INITIATIVE: $5,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesSE RALEIGH PROMISE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesThe Conference Board Inc: $25,000 · Community ImprovementREGIONAL PLAN ASSOCIATION INC: $12,500 · Community ImprovementTECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Community ImprovementFRIENDS OF SEATTLE WATERFRONT: $10,000 · Community ImprovementGEORGIA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Community ImprovementTRANSPORTATION CHOICES COALITION: $5,000 · Community ImprovementHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $28,500 · PhilanthropyALOHA UNITED WAY INC: $16,500 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,648,668International$444,830Health$184,503Arts & Culture$179,350Human Services$108,297Community Improvement$67,500Philanthropy$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $300,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY SEATTLE-KING COUNTY: $211,400 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL BUILDING MUSEUM: $150,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetBRIDGES TO PROSPERITY INC: $110,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $88,130 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetACEC RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $45,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $34,830 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDSTAR HEALTH INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSALVADORI CENTER LTD: $29,350 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $28,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCEANTIC NETWORK INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetThe Conference Board Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBanner Health Foundation: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA VOLUNTEERS FUND: $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $17,503 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALOHA UNITED WAY INC: $16,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCalifornia Transportation Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC: $14,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREGIONAL PLAN ASSOCIATION INC: $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCARROLL HOSPITAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHEAL THE BAY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRIVERKEEPER INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGULF OF MEXICO ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $7,980 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ST DOMINIC'S INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5,586 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUILT ENVIRONMENT PLUS: $5,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,167 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAIA HONOLULU: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICA'S WATERSHED INITIATIVE: $5,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetMedical City Dallas Auxiliary: $5,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTRANSPORTATION CHOICES COALITION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMercy Health Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAN ACHIEVABLE DREAM VIRGINIA BEACH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHAPLAINCY MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetPORT EVERGLADES ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER MIAMI INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSE RALEIGH PROMISE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

ImpactassetsincThe Satterberg Founda…Gates FoundationAARPAmerican Gift FundSeattle FoundationGs Donor Advised Phil…Silicon Valley Commun…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…American Endowment Fo…
ImpactassetsincMD13.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Impactassetsinc · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · Gates Foundation · AARP · American Gift Fund · Seattle Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wsp Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wsp Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Medstar Health Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Oceantic Network Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Wsp Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Wsp Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 98 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wsp’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home