Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wright Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$274kReligion$40kCivil Rights$18kHuman Services$6kHealth$4kFood & Nutrition$3kHousing & Shelter$2kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$311k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UW FOUNDATION$10,000
EDGEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
CITY CHURCH MADISON$2,000
BRIDGE TO BRIGHTER INC$1,000
CITY CHURCH MADISON$1,000
BRIDGE TO BRIGHTER INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BRIDGE TO BRIGHTER INC: $1k → 5%BRIDGE TO BRIGHTER INC: $1k → 5%BRIDGE TO BRIGHTER INC: $1k → 5%BRIDGE TO BRIGHTER INC: $500 → 5%THE ROAD HOME: $500 → 10%THE ROAD HOME: $500 → 10%THE ROAD HOME: $250 → 10%CARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER OF DANE C: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
WI
CO
KY
AZ
TN
DC
OK
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$335k · 25 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
21

Total granted

$335k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+56%

Still filing today

48%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEducationCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $220k · revenue +39%
  • EC
    EDGEWOOD CAMPUS SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2018–2021 · $13k · revenue +94%
  • WF
    Wisconsin Family Council
    5× · 2019–2024 · $13k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • SJ
    ST JOHN THE BAPTIST CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • DC
    DOXA CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • MC
    MARQUETTE COMMUNITY CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wisconsin Foundation United Church of Christ Inc

Wisconsin foundation united church of christ, inc. is a catalyst for positive change in the life of the united church of christ in wisconsin; promotes a culture of generosity; and connects people across the ucc in working for a more just…

Religion
2
Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…

Religion
3
Cornerstone of Hope Inc

Cornerstone of hope, inc. exists to improve the quality of life for working-class families, veterans, and senior citizens in the low to middle-income bracket who wish to improve their lives and the lives of their children through better…

Housing & Shelter
4
Pro-Life Wisconsin Inc

Defend the right to life of all citizens of our state, whether born or preborn, young, old, disabled, or terminally ill. we affirm that the right to life exists at the moment of fertilization and extends until natural death.

—
5
Wisconsin Lutheran Home Ministries Inc

To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.

—
6
Greg Fritz Ministries Inc

To proclaim gospel of jesus.

Religion
7
Family Connect of Wisconsin Inc

Family connect of wisconsin uses careportal, a software platform, to connect social service caseworkers with church response teams to supply, basic needs to a family in cirisis with the goal of preventing the child from entering foster…

Human Services
8
Southeastern Wisconsin Youth for Christ Inc

Southeastern wisconsin youth for christ works towards reaching young people everywhere, working together with the local church and other likeminded partners to raise up lifelong followers of jesus who lead by their godliness in lifestyle,…

—
9
Midwest University

Christian institution of higher learning dedicated to the exploration, discernment, sustentation, and dissemination of god's truth. midwest is committed to excellence in education encouraging students to comprehensively consider god's word…

Education
10
Child Evangelism Fellowship of Wisconsin

Child evangelism fellowship is an evangelical, bible-centered mission whose purpose is to evangelize boys and girls with the gospel of the lord jesus christ and to establish (disciple) them in the word of god and in a local church for…

Youth Development
11
Found in Faith Ministries Inc Dba Fresh Start Furnishings

We provide furniture and home goods to families and individuals that financially qualify for our program. our current focus area is harford county, maryland but are happy to give referrals to resources in other counties when possible.

Human Services
12
My Fathers House Missions Intl Inc

To provide outreach to ugandan women and children.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shelter From the Storm Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is Narrow Road Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $220,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATIONEDGEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL: $35,500 · OtherEDGEWOOD HIGH SCHOOLEDGEWOOD CAMPUS SCHOOL INC: $12,875 · OtherEDGEWOOD CAMPUS SCHOOL INCWisconsin Family Council: $12,500 · OtherWisconsin Family CouncilWEST MADISON BIBLE CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherWEST MADISON BIBLE CHURCHST JOHN THE BAPTIST CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $5,000 · OtherLIBERTY COUNSEL: $4,000 · OtherCITY CHURCH MADISON INC: $3,750 · Other+26 more: $20,500 · Other+26 moreVCY AMERICA INC: $11,500 · ReligionNARROW ROAD MINISTRIES INC: $1,000 · Religion+2 more: $500 · ReligionBRIDGE TO BRIGHTER INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesTHE ROAD HOME DANE COUNTY INC: $1,250 · Human ServicesCARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER OF DANE COUNTY INC: $500 · Human ServicesALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $5,000 · Civil RightsSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI: $1,250 · Food & NutritionTHE RIVER FOOD PANTRY INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionEXTENDED HANDS PANTRY INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionWISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR LAW & LIBERTY: $1,100 · Crime & Legal
Education$220,000Other$104,125Religion$13,000Human Services$5,250Civil Rights$5,000Food & Nutrition$3,250Crime & Legal$1,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $220,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEDGEWOOD CAMPUS SCHOOL INC: $12,875 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWisconsin Family Council: $12,500 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGE TO BRIGHTER INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ROAD HOME DANE COUNTY INC: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR LAW & LIBERTY: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNARROW ROAD MINISTRIES INC: $1,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSTATE OF GRACE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE RIVER FOOD PANTRY INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEXTENDED HANDS PANTRY INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTER FROM THE STORM MINISTRIES INC: $750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP GRAY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER OF DANE COUNTY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANSWERS IN GENESIS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZETEO COMMUNITY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EDGEWOOD CAMPUS SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Wisconsin Family Council ↗
  • Who funds VCY AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE TO BRIGHTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ROAD HOME DANE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR LAW & LIBERTY ↗
  • Who funds NARROW ROAD MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds STATE OF GRACE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE RIVER FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds EXTENDED HANDS PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds SHELTER FROM THE STORM MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP GRAY INC ↗
  • Who funds CARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER OF DANE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds ANSWERS IN GENESIS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Madison Community FoundationWI17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Madison Community Foundation · United Way of Dane County Inc · Endres Manufacturing Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wright Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wright Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Wright Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Wright Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wright Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph