Skip to content
WR Berkley Corporation Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

WR Berkley Corporation Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$721k
Granted FY2025still arriving
142
Grants FY2025still arriving
34
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$2.6MFood & Nutrition$989kHuman Services$720kArts & Culture$690kInternational$599kEducation$427kYouth Development$297kPhilanthropy$225kOther$0
02FY2025 · 142 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k119 grants · $320k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $302k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$2,500
Median grant
34
States reached
$970k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TMPAA CHARITIES INC$100,000
FAMILY CENTERS INC$25,000
BRUCE MUSEUM INC$20,000
KIDS CHANCE OF VIRGINIA INC$18,660
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC$17,610
FEEDING AMERICA$17,180
NEAR & FAR AID ASSOCIATION INC$17,000
FRIENDS OF GREEN CHIMNEYS$17,000
WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION$15,000
CIRCLE OF CARE FOR FAMILIES WITH CANCER$14,000
WWP INC - WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC$13,250
KIDS CHANCE OF AMERICA$12,871
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$12,000
FAMILY CENTERS INC$11,000
KIDS IN CRISIS INC$10,948
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $567k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LOAVES & FISHES FOOD PANTRY INC: $5k → 8%CHARITABLE ASSISTANCE TO COMMUNITYS HOMELESS: $3k → 8%JUSTICE FOR ORPHANS INC: $5k → 14%PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $2k → 5%HEALING HOUSE INC: $10k → 15%OUR PIECE OF THE PIE INC: $5k → 11%JASONS DREAMS FOR KIDS INC: $3k → 6%KIDS CHANCE OF VIRGINIA INC: $23k → 9%EASTER SEALS NEW HAMPSHIRE INC: $5k → 7%HORACE MANN EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATES INC: $3k → 7%CHARITABLE ASSISTANCE TO COMMUNITYS HOMELESS: $3k → 8%WONDERS & WORRIES INC: $5k → 10%KIDS CHANCE OF VIRGINIA INC: $14k → 7%KIDS CHANCE OF VIRGINIA INC: $20k → 9%KING STREET CENTER INC: $3k → 10%EASTER SEALS NEW HAMPSHIRE INC: $5k → 7%MASS211 INC: $3k → 8%REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SUPPORT SERVICES OF EMMAUS I: $3k → 14%WONDERS & WORRIES INC: $5k → 10%KIDS CHANCE OF VIRGINIA INC: $20k → 9%EASTER SEALS NEW HAMPSHIRE INC: $4k → 7%PINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%OCEANSIDE IVEY RANCH PARK ASSOCIATION: $2k → 11%JAY NOLAN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $3k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $3k → 14%KIDS CHANCE OF VIRGINIA INC: $19k → 9%EASTER SEALS NEW HAMPSHIRE INC: $3k → 7%DES MOINES AREA RELIGIOUS COUNCIL: $3k → 10%KIDS CHANCE OF VIRGINIA INC: $12k → 9%AUTISM SOCIETY OF MAINE: $3k → 12%ITS ALL ABOUT THE KIDS FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN H: $5k → 11%KIDS CHANCE OF VIRGINIA INC: $11k → 9%KIDS CHANCE OF VIRGINIA INC: $9k → 9%NEW HAMPSHIRE CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $5k → 7%SHARING LIFE COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $4k → 14%KIDS CHANCE OF VIRGINIA INC: $6k → 9%NEW HAMPSHIRE CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $5k → 7%ABILITY360 INC: $2k → 11%FAMILY PLACE INC: $4k → 14%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER NASHUA INC: $4k → 7%PREBLE STREET: $3k → 7%THE OPPORTUNITY ALLIANCE: $3k → 7%WEBSTER HOUSE: $5k → 7%WEBSTER HOUSE: $5k → 7%WEBSTER HOUSE: $3k → 7%GIFTS OF LOVE INC: $5k → 11%THE CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY: $236k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.5M · 135 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

135 repeat relationships: 52 still active in FY2025, 83 since wound down; 79 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

135
271

Total granted

$5.5M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+29%

Still filing today

90%
84%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $382k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GREENWICH HOSPITAL
    5× · 2017–2021 · $1.7M · revenue +52%
  • Feeding America
    5× · 2020–2025 · $671k · revenue +40%
  • BENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2022 · $288k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $236k · revenue +36%
  • PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $228k · revenue +33%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +63%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
2
Lifestream Inc

Lifestream, inc. (the organization") provides community-based services that support individuals in attaining greater independence, promising opportunities, and lives that are meaningful and fulfilling on their own terms.

Health
3
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
4
Marrakech Inc

Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…

Employment
5
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
6
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
7
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
8
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
9
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
10
Search for Change Inc

Dedicated to improving the quality of life and increasing the self sufficiency of individuals with emotional, social and economic barriers. this is accomplished by providing direct support and assistance needed to enable individuals to…

Human Services
11
Residential Opportunities Inc

We partner with children and adults with disabilities and their families so they may live more meaningful, healthy, and independent lives in their homes and communities.

Human Services
12
United Way of Connecticut Inc

United way of connecticut is proud to be a trusted and vital resource for help and information about what the people of connecticut need. we respond to requests for food, housing, health care, child care, child development resources,…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Can Help Inc; the most unlike its peers is Middle Flint Area Council On Aging. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

427 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 427 of the 491 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
103
Early backer (in before they grew)
421/427
Grantees still filing
290/427
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREENWICH HOSPITAL: $1,675,000 · HealthGREENWICH HOSPITALBENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $288,332 · HealthBENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $228,339 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATIO…+28 more: $356,663 · Health+28 moreFeeding America: $670,865 · Food & NutritionFeeding Ameri…ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $32,000 · Food & Nutrition+14 more: $141,047 · Food & Nutrition+14 moreST JOHNS UNIVERSITY - SCHOOL OF RISK MANAGEMENT: $150,000 · OtherST JOHNS UNIVERSITY - SCHO…FAMILY CENTERS INC: $74,079 · OtherAMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $66,042 · OtherAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $148,456 · OtherAMERICARES FOUNDATION INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENWICH: $65,000 · OtherWASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION: $135,000 · OtherWASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATIO…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $126,582 · OtherSAMARITAN'S PURSE+83 more: $871,921 · Other+83 moreBRUCE MUSEUM INC: $520,000 · Arts & CultureBRUCE MUSE…FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF…+7 more: $45,000 · Arts & Culture+7 moreTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $235,889 · Human ServicesTHE CHILD…KIDS CHANCE OF VIRGINIA INC: $133,411 · Human ServicesKIDS CHAN…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $38,698 · Human ServicesAmerican …+20 more: $193,619 · Human Services+20 moreBANK STREET COLLEGE OF EDUCATION: $100,000 · EducationKids Chance Inc: $56,290 · EducationOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC: $40,000 · EducationTHE GREENWICH LIBRARY: $25,000 · EducationMARIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL: $22,920 · EducationLOYOLA ACADEMY OF ST LOUIS: $19,041 · EducationARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · EducationThe Foundation for Maine's Community Colleges: $15,000 · Education+9 more: $67,285 · EducationTMPAA CHARITIES INC: $100,000 · PhilanthropyKIDS CHANCE OF MARYLAND INC: $36,100 · PhilanthropyTHE FRIENDS OF GREEN CHIMNEYS: $17,000 · PhilanthropyINSURANCE INDUSTRY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $14,013 · PhilanthropyQuarterbacking Children's Health Foundation: $12,500 · Philanthropy+9 more: $57,720 · Philanthropy
Health$2,548,334Food & Nutrition$843,912Other$1,637,080Arts & Culture$665,000Human Services$601,617Education$360,536Philanthropy$237,333

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREENWICH HOSPITAL: $1,675,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $670,865 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBRUCE MUSEUM INC: $520,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetBENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $288,332 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $235,889 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $228,339 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $148,456 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION: $135,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetKIDS CHANCE OF VIRGINIA INC: $133,411 over 9y, 36% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $126,582 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBANK STREET COLLEGE OF EDUCATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $78,391 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY CENTERS INC: $74,079 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENWICH: $65,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetKids Chance Inc: $56,290 over 3y, 23% of budgetKIDS CHANCE OF AMERICA: $52,110 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetMANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $43,770 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $39,233 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $38,698 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS CHANCE OF MARYLAND INC: $36,100 over 4y, 13% of budgetCHILD CRISIS ARIZONA: $33,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $32,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS IN CRISIS INC: $27,913 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFEED MORE INC: $26,036 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GREENWICH LIBRARY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMARIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL: $22,920 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $21,933 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $20,715 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA ACADEMY OF ST LOUIS: $19,041 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetFOOD BANK OF SOUTH JERSEY INC: $18,205 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $18,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSPIERINGS CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetJERSEY BATTERED WOMEN'S SERVICE INC: $17,286 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF GREEN CHIMNEYS: $17,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE NEAR AND FAR ASSOCIATION INC: $17,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetEaster Seals New Hampshire Inc: $16,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTABLE TO TABLE INC: $15,645 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $15,279 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARY'S PLACE SEATTLE: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Foundation for Maine's Community Colleges: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHEPHZIBAH CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetA SIMPLE GESTURE - GREENSBORO INC: $14,457 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetINSURANCE INDUSTRY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $14,013 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCIRCLE OF CARE FOR FAMILIES OF CHILDREN WITH CANCER INC: $14,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bangor Savings Bank F…Sam L Cohen FoundationPeoples United Commun…Davis Family Foundati…Saco & Biddeford Savi…Maine Community Found…Onion FoundationSimmons Foundation - …Agnes M Lindsay TrustElmina B Sewall Found…Fisher Charitable Fou…Td Charitable Foundat…
Bangor Savings Bank FoundationME49.7× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Sam L Cohen Foundation · Peoples United Community Foundation · Davis Family Foundation · Saco & Biddeford Savings Charitable Foundation · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Onion Foundation · Simmons Foundation - PerkinsThompson · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Elmina B Sewall Foundation · Fisher Charitable Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization WR Berkley Corporation Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from WR Berkley Corporation Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 200%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Friendship Service Center Inc: 85% of income from government
  • Unashamed Inc: 75% of income from government
  • Clear Path for Veterans New England Inc: 62% of income from government
  • Veterans Inc: 58% of income from government
  • Committee On Temporary Shelter Inc: 52% of income from government
  • Kids in Crisis Inc: 49% of income from government
  • Autism New Jersey Inc: 44% of income from government
  • Jersey Battered Women's Service Inc: 40% of income from government
  • Lund Family Center Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Food Bank of South Jersey Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Champlain Valley Office of Economic Opportunity Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Our Piece of the Pie Inc: 21% of income from government
  • Family Centers Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Stamford Inc: 17% of income from government
  • Worcester Natural History Society Inc: 8% of income from government
  • The Morris Museum Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Greenwich: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Veterans Base Camp Inc: 4% of income from government
  • The Arc of Connecticut Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Boys and Girls Clubs of Metrowest Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The Jewish Federation of Greater New Haven Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Bruce Museum Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Insurance Library Association of Boston: 0% of income from government
  • Greenwich Hospital: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
20get no government money at all
46report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
5rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to WR Berkley Corporation Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to WR Berkley Corporation Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 491 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on WR Berkley’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home