Skip to content

· Private foundation

World Religion Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Religion$87kEducation$40kHuman Services$38kHealth$30kPhilanthropy$25kCivil Rights$10kYouth Development$6kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $27k
$9,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERFAITH COUNCIL OF METROPOLITAN$15,000
YMCA$12,000
NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE$9,500
CENTER FOR HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE MIDDL$9,000
THE INTERFAITH CENTER AT MIAMI UNIVERSIT$9,000
UNITED RELIGIONS INITIATIVE IN NORTH$8,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%PARTNERS IN HOPE INC: $6k → 10%PARTNERS IN HOPE INC: $5k → 10%THE GREAT MIAMI VALLEY YMCA: $15k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$80k · 4 repeat orgs$147k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

$80k
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+18%

Still filing today

25%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    THE INTERFAITH CENTER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $35k
  • SV
    ST VINCENT DE PAUL
    3× · 2023–2025 · $18k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF THE MIDDLE EAST PROJECT
    2× · 2022–2023 · $16k

Funded once

  • NU
    NEXUS UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • GM
    GREAT MIAMI VALLEY YMCAgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +63%
  • NC
    NEW CREATION COUNSELING CENTER INC
    one grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue -28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
2
The Interfaith Alliance Foundation Inc

Interfaith alliance is a growing network of people of diverse faiths and beliefs across the country working together to build a resilient democracy and fulfill america's promise of religious freedom and civil rights not just for some, but…

Religion
3
Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Denver

The mission of the ymca of metropolitan denver is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all. the ymca of metropolitan denver is recognized as the area's largest provider of…

Human Services
4
The Jewish Federation of Greater Washington Inc

The jewish federation of greater washington (federation) envisions a connected and vibrant jewish community that cares for each other, fosters jewish learning and journeys, embraces jewish peoplehood and israel, and acts as a force for…

Philanthropy
5
Jewish Federation of Greater Pittsburgh

Our vision is a flourishing jewish community where everyone feels included, supported and inspired. in order to accomplish this vision we cultivate resources, connect people and collaborate across the community to live and fulfill jewish…

Philanthropy
6
Jewish Federation of Greater Portland

To assure the building and strengthening of the jewish community locally, nationally, overseas and in israel, in accordance with jewish values.

Philanthropy
7
Portersville Christian School

The mission of portersville christian school is to glorify god by preparing students to serve christ and instilling high standards spiritually, academically, socially, and physically. the school provides a high-quality academic program, a…

Education
8
The Jerusalem Connection
—
9
Young Mens Christian Association

The montgomery ymca, reflecting its judeo-christian heritage, is an association of volunteers, members, and staff open to and serving all, providing programs and services which develop spirit, mind, and body. montgomery ymca statement of…

Human Services
10
Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago

Federation amplifies our collective strength to make the world a better place for everyone. we assist people in need, impact chicagoans of all faiths; support israel and the jewish people worldwide; respond swiftly to crises; cultivate…

Philanthropy
11
Greater Miami Hillel Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate and graduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

—
12
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is Bethany Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE INTERFAITH CENTER: $35,000 · OtherTHE INTERFAITH CENTERNEXUS UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST: $25,000 · OtherNEXUS UNITED CHURCH OF CHRISTST VINCENT DE PAUL: $18,000 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAULUNIVERSITY OF THE MIDDLE EAST PROJECT: $16,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF THE MIDDLE EAST PROJECTINTERFAITH COUNCIL OF METROPOLITAN: $15,000 · OtherINTERFAITH COUNCIL OF METROPOLITANYMCA: $12,000 · OtherYMCANATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE: $9,500 · OtherNATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCECENTER FOR HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE MIDDL: $9,000 · OtherTHE INTERFAITH CENTER AT MIAMI UNIVERSIT: $9,000 · OtherUNITED RELIGIONS INITIATIVE IN NORTH: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · Other+3 more: $7,700 · OtherGREAT MIAMI VALLEY YMCA: $15,000 · Human ServicesGREAT MIAMI…PARTNERS IN HOPE INCORPORATED: $10,700 · Human ServicesPARTNERS IN…JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $19,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDE…JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DAYTON INC: $6,309 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDE…NEW CREATION COUNSELING CENTER INC: $12,000 · HealthYOUNG LIFE: $5,700 · Youth DevelopmentUniversity of Dayton: $5,700 · EducationBETHANY CENTER: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$172,200Human Services$25,700Philanthropy$25,309Health$12,000Youth Development$5,700Education$5,700Food & Nutrition$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $19,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT MIAMI VALLEY YMCA: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW CREATION COUNSELING CENTER INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPARTNERS IN HOPE INCORPORATED: $10,700 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetNATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE: $9,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DAYTON INC: $6,309 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $5,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Dayton: $5,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETHANY CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetINTERFAITH CONFERENCE OF METROPOLIT: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds GREAT MIAMI VALLEY YMCA ↗
  • Who funds NEW CREATION COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HOPE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DAYTON INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds University of Dayton ↗
  • Who funds BETHANY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH CONFERENCE OF METROPOLIT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization World Religion Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from World Religion Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on World Religion’s filings →

    More from the funding graph