Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

World Religion Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Religion$87kEducation$40kHuman Services$38kHealth$30kPhilanthropy$25kCivil Rights$10kYouth Development$6kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $27k
$9,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERFAITH COUNCIL OF METROPOLITAN$15,000
YMCA$12,000
NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE$9,500
CENTER FOR HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE MIDDL$9,000
THE INTERFAITH CENTER AT MIAMI UNIVERSIT$9,000
UNITED RELIGIONS INITIATIVE IN NORTH$8,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%PARTNERS IN HOPE INC: $6k → 10%PARTNERS IN HOPE INC: $5k → 10%THE GREAT MIAMI VALLEY YMCA: $15k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$80k · 4 repeat orgs$147k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

$80k
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+18%

Still filing today

25%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    THE INTERFAITH CENTER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $35k
  • SV
    ST VINCENT DE PAUL
    3× · 2023–2025 · $18k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF THE MIDDLE EAST PROJECT
    2× · 2022–2023 · $16k

Funded once

  • NU
    NEXUS UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • GM
    GREAT MIAMI VALLEY YMCAgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +63%
  • NC
    NEW CREATION COUNSELING CENTER INC
    one grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue -28%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
2
The Interfaith Alliance Foundation Inc

Interfaith alliance is a growing network of people of diverse faiths and beliefs across the country working together to build a resilient democracy and fulfill america's promise of religious freedom and civil rights not just for some, but…

Religion
3
Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Denver

The mission of the ymca of metropolitan denver is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all. the ymca of metropolitan denver is recognized as the area's largest provider of…

Human Services
4
The Jewish Federation of Greater Washington Inc

The jewish federation of greater washington (federation) envisions a connected and vibrant jewish community that cares for each other, fosters jewish learning and journeys, embraces jewish peoplehood and israel, and acts as a force for…

Philanthropy
5
Jewish Federation of Greater Pittsburgh

Our vision is a flourishing jewish community where everyone feels included, supported and inspired. in order to accomplish this vision we cultivate resources, connect people and collaborate across the community to live and fulfill jewish…

Philanthropy
6
Jewish Federation of Greater Portland

To assure the building and strengthening of the jewish community locally, nationally, overseas and in israel, in accordance with jewish values.

Philanthropy
7
Portersville Christian School

The mission of portersville christian school is to glorify god by preparing students to serve christ and instilling high standards spiritually, academically, socially, and physically. the school provides a high-quality academic program, a…

Education
8
The Jerusalem Connection
9
Young Mens Christian Association

The montgomery ymca, reflecting its judeo-christian heritage, is an association of volunteers, members, and staff open to and serving all, providing programs and services which develop spirit, mind, and body. montgomery ymca statement of…

Human Services
10
Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago

Federation amplifies our collective strength to make the world a better place for everyone. we assist people in need, impact chicagoans of all faiths; support israel and the jewish people worldwide; respond swiftly to crises; cultivate…

Philanthropy
11
Greater Miami Hillel Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate and graduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

12
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life and the most unlike its peers is Bethany Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE INTERFAITH CENTER — $35,000 · OtherTHE INTERFAITH CENTERNEXUS UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST — $25,000 · OtherNEXUS UNITED CHURCH OF CHRISTST VINCENT DE PAUL — $18,000 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAULUNIVERSITY OF THE MIDDLE EAST PROJECT — $16,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF THE MIDDLE EAST PROJECTINTERFAITH COUNCIL OF METROPOLITAN — $15,000 · OtherINTERFAITH COUNCIL OF METROPOLITANYMCA — $12,000 · OtherYMCANATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE — $9,500 · OtherNATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCECENTER FOR HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE MIDDL — $9,000 · OtherTHE INTERFAITH CENTER AT MIAMI UNIVERSIT — $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $8,000 · OtherUNITED RELIGIONS INITIATIVE IN NORTH — $8,000 · Other+3 more — $7,700 · OtherGREAT MIAMI VALLEY YMCA — $15,000 · Human ServicesGREAT MIAMI…PARTNERS IN HOPE INCORPORATED — $10,700 · Human ServicesPARTNERS IN…JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND — $19,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDE…JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DAYTON INC — $6,309 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDE…NEW CREATION COUNSELING CENTER INC — $12,000 · HealthYOUNG LIFE — $5,700 · Youth DevelopmentUniversity of Dayton — $5,700 · EducationBETHANY CENTER — $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$172,200Human Services$25,700Philanthropy$25,309Health$12,000Youth Development$5,700Education$5,700Food & Nutrition$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND — $19,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT MIAMI VALLEY YMCA — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW CREATION COUNSELING CENTER INC — $12,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPARTNERS IN HOPE INCORPORATED — $10,700 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetNATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE — $9,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DAYTON INC — $6,309 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $5,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Dayton — $5,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETHANY CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetINTERFAITH CONFERENCE OF METROPOLIT — $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND
  • Who funds GREAT MIAMI VALLEY YMCA
  • Who funds NEW CREATION COUNSELING CENTER INC
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HOPE INCORPORATED
  • Who funds NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DAYTON INC
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds University of Dayton
  • Who funds BETHANY CENTER
  • Who funds INTERFAITH CONFERENCE OF METROPOLIT

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization World Religion Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph