· Public charity
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals
To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 50% of WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 15 grants below total $4,019,857 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $55,036,045 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $51,016,188 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $141k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $419k
- $250k+6 grants · $3.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ARRIVE MINISTRIES | $1,336,885 |
| SALEM FOR REFUGEES | $839,704 |
| FIRST 90 | $368,315 |
| INTERNATIONAL WELCOME CENTER | $328,922 |
| ALLIANCE FOR REFUGEES | $311,664 |
| MISSION ADELANTE | $266,693 |
| BIRMINGHAM CROSS CULTURAL CONNECTIONS | $189,349 |
| RISING VILLAGE FOUNDATION | $129,505 |
| MOTHER AFRICA | $100,381 |
| TRANSFORM MINNESOTA | $44,154 |
| PATHWAYS TO CITIZENSHIP | $44,150 |
| NATIONAL IMMIGRATION FORUM | $32,710 |
| CORNERSTONE CHURCH OF WEST LOS ANGELES | $10,000 |
| GOOD SAMARITAN HAITIAN ALLIANCE CHURCH | $10,000 |
| SEND RELIEF | $7,425 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $2.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $12M on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: COVID-19 EMERGENCY RESPONSE AND HEALTH SYSTEM PREPAREDNESS ADDITIONAL FINANCING · HUMANITARIAN EMERGENCY RESPONSE AND FOOD CRISIS RESPONSE · INTEGRATED FOOD CRISIS RESPONSE AND MULTISECTOR LIFESAVING RESPONSE
Stated purpose: PROCESS OF TRANSITIONING WORLD RELIEF ACTIVITIES AND PROGRAMMING TO A NEW LOCAL NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION (LNGO) · MYANMAR DISASTER RESPONSE
Stated purpose: INTEGRATED LIFESAVING RESPONSE · MULTISECTORAL INTERVENTIONS HEALTH, WASH,PROTECTION & LIFESAVING RESPONSE · LEBANON CONFLICT RESPONSE
Stated purpose: UKRAINE CRISIS · UKRAINE CRISIS RESPONSE
Stated purpose: AFGHANISTAN EARTHQUAKE 2025 DR RESPONSE
Stated purpose: WATER AND FOOD SECURITY NEEDS TO VULNERABLE GROUPS
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $64k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AMARRIVE MINISTRIES9× · 2017–2025 · $7.3M · revenue +156% · 71% of their budget
SALEM FOR REFUGEES4× · 2022–2025 · $4.6M · revenue +107% · 44% of their budget- IWINTERNATIONAL WELCOME CENTER3× · 2023–2025 · $949k · revenue +18% · 76% of their budget
Funded once
- IIINFUSED IMPACT INCone grant, 2022 · $885k · revenue -98%
- BWBAPTIST WORLD ALLIANCEone grant, 2022 · $250k
- NCNORTH CAROLINA BAPTIST MENone grant, 2019 · $125k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We offer hope and help to refugee, asylumseeking, and immigrant families in the Washington D.C. metro area. We provide educational programs that help families learn English. We provide practical assistance and connections to community…
The Chicago Refugee Coalition is a 501c3 non-profit organization dedicated ot the alleviation of human suffering through innovative partnerships, advocacy and community empowerment.
promote the well-being, integration, and rights of refugees, asylum-seekers, and other vulnerable migrants by elevating their voices, informing policy, and fostering community leadership
i58 Global is a Christian ministry dedicated to recruiting, sending and organizing relief workers to provide aid and share hope to refugees in various European countries.
We provide aid to refugees, both at home and abroad. Simply humanitarian.
Exodus Refugee Immigration is dedicated to the protection of human rights by serving the resettlement needs of refugees and other displaced people fleeing persecution, injustice and war by welcoming them to Indiana.
Provide care to refugee families.
Helping jumpstart the careers of educated, skilled refugees globally, RJS provides virtual coaching by a worldwide cadre of pro bono, certified leadership, wellness, and career coaches, along with job search, enterpreneurship and industry…
Provide services to in-transit migrant populations throughout their journeys and assist with resettlement processes of asylum seekers and migrants.
Refuge seeks to glorify God by partnering with local churches to love refugees and immigrants.
Serving recently arrived migrants and asylum seekers in the Chicagoland area and is committed to upholding the dignity and human rights of immigrants.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Hungry Inc and the most unlike its peers is Amextra Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 13% of your grantees by number, and just 11% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ARRIVE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds SALEM FOR REFUGEES ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL WELCOME CENTER ↗
- Who funds INFUSED IMPACT INC ↗
- Who funds AS IT SHOULD BE INC ↗
- Who funds Alliance for Refugees ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN CONNECTIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds MOTHER AFRICA ↗
- Who funds Lutheran Community Services Northwest ↗
- Who funds PATHWAYS TO CITIZENSHIP ↗
- Who funds Birmingham Cross Cultural Connections ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC ↗
- Who funds RISING VILLAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL IMMIGRATION FORUM ↗
- Who funds AMEXTRA INC ↗
- Who funds LITERACY SOURCE A COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds NAZARENE COMPASSIONATE MINISTRIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Tides Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Salem for Refugees — 35% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.