Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

World Emergency Relief

WORLD EMERGENCY RELIEF alleviates the suffering of human beings by providing humanitarian relief and developmental aid to people who have been marginalized by geography or harmed by natural disaster, war, armed conflict, exploitation, physical or mental abuse or economic deprivation.

$19M
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222024.

Environment$74kEducation$10kReligion$9k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $45,187 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $19,433,988 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $19,388,801 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $36k
$36,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOL COMMUNICATIONS$36,000
WITHOUT RESERVATION MINISTRIES$9,187
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOLBROOK INDIAN SCHOOL: $10k → 26%WITHOUT RESERVATION MINISTRIES: $9k → 28%SOL COMMUNICATIONS: $36k → 14%SOL COMMUNICATIONS: $23k → 14%SOL COMMUNICATIONS: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Grants abroad, by region — $9.6M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 5 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$6.7M · 70% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: HEALTH & HYGIENE AND HUMANITARIAN AID · HUMANITARIAN AID

South Asia$913k · 9% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: HUMANITARIAN AID

Central America and the Caribbean$866k · 9% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: HUMANITARIAN AID

Middle East and North Africa$589k · 6% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: HUMANITARIAN AID

Sub-Saharan Africa$534k · 6% · 5 grants

Stated purpose: PROGRAM SUPPORT & HUMANITARIAN AID · HUMANITARIAN AID

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Messengers of Hope Mission Inc

mobile food pantry

Food & Nutrition
2
Relieve Humanity International Inc

Relieve poverty

International
3
3G Food Pantry

Local food pantry serving those food insecurity.

Food & Nutrition
4
Food for Needy Inc
Food & Nutrition
5
World Harvest Charities and Family Services

We nbsp;distributed nbsp;over nbsp;200 nbsp;million nbsp;pounds nbsp;of nbsp;food nbsp;through nbsp;our nbsp;food nbsp;bank nbsp;and nbsp;partnered nbsp;with nbsp;200 nbsp;local nbsp;organizations

Human Services
6
Speed Family Blessing Box & Pantry
7
Victory Life Church International

Church, religious

Religion
8
FIGHT2FEED a Charitable Organization

To feed the needy and homeless

Food & Nutrition
9
Eben-Ezer Ministries Corp
Religion
10
Deliver the Difference Inc

Deliver The Difference is a humanitarian hunger relief organizations. We believe it is wrong that children go to bed hungry and not knowing where their next meal will come from. We believe it is wrong that seniors have to decided whether…

11
Grace Farm Ministries Inc

Provide fresh food to low income people

Food & Nutrition
12
God Provides Ministry

To provide free food to homeless, veterans, and others

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maximum Impact Love Inc and the most unlike its peers is People Help Exchange Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%15%5–10yr20%31%10–20yr17%35%20–35yr11%15%35–55yr13%4%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr17%79%20–35yr11%0%35–55yr13%11%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/33
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,945

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2021–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20212025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
10/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SOL Communications Inc — $73,500 · EnvironmentSOL Communications IncHOLBROOK SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST INDIAN SCHL INC FKA HLDBRK SD INDI — $10,000 · OtherHOLBROOK SEVENTH-DAY AD…WITHOUT RESERVATION MINISTRIES — $9,187 · OtherWITHOUT RESERVATION MIN…
Environment$73,500Other$19,187

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOL Communications Inc — $73,500 over 3y, 58% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOL Communications Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Feed the Children IncOK18.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Feed the Children Inc · Lesea Global Feed the Hungry Inc · The Society of St Andrew Inc · Means Database Inc · Farmlink Project · Good360 · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization World Emergency Relief funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
2122232425
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2125

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to World Emergency Relief?

    Find your warmest path to World Emergency Relief through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph