How much did WORKSOURCE MONTGOMERY INC grant in FY2023?

WORKSOURCE MONTGOMERY INC reported 87 grants totaling $3,111,776 in its FY2023 IRS filing.

Where is WORKSOURCE MONTGOMERY INC based?

WORKSOURCE MONTGOMERY INC is based in MD.

WORKSOURCE MONTGOMERY INC

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

WORKSOURCE MONTGOMERY INC

Assist the montgomery county wib, in expanding the public workforce development system in the county, through serving and connecting job seekers and businesses.

$3.1M

Granted FY2023

Grants

Communities

$314k

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 81% of WORKSOURCE MONTGOMERY INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2021

—

2022

training supportivesupportive compensationcompensation employees

2023

participant wagesrecoveryyoutheducationalchildrencarelearning

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 87 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k6 grants · $46k
$10k–50k60 grants · $1.3M
$50k–250k20 grants · $1.4M
$250k+1 grant · $314k

$22,180

Median grant

States reached

$11M

Total assets

Largest grants

ASM EDUCATION CENTER INC$313,633
WANADA AUTOMOBILE DEALER$160,177
FREDDY'S LAWN SERVICE & LANDSCAPING$100,000
LATIN GOODNESS FOODS LLC$100,000
MEDCERTS LLC$81,250
THE ARC MONTGOMERY COUNTY INC$80,000
SOORITA GOORAH DDS PA$75,000
FIRST POWER MEDIA$60,000
ELECTRIC ADVANTAGE INC$60,000
MASON PROPERTIES$60,000
PRIMARY CARE COALITION OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY INC$56,095
RPG CARD SERVICES$55,359
MY CUP RUNNETH OVER SOUTHERN CUISINE LLC$55,000
THE URBAN WINERY$55,000
SMR INC$52,200

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $132k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 10%. 22% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

30%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.1M · 11 repeat orgs$2.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 75 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.1M

$156k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%

+1%

Still filing today

27%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.4M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthEmploymentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

AE
ASM Education Center Inc
2× · 2022–2023 · $387k
ML
Medcerts LLC
2× · 2022–2023 · $200k
LA
Latin American Youth Centers Inc
2× · 2022–2023 · $106k · revenue +16%

Funded once

UA
Universities at Shady Grove Foundation
one grant, 2021 · $90k · revenue +1%
WA
Wanada Automobile Dealer
one grant, 2022 · $36k · revenue -13%
WA
We Are Renewed
one grant, 2022 · $22k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Educare Dc

To eliminate the opportunity gap with high-quality early learning for children prenatal to age 5.

Human Services

The Arc Baltimore Inc

The arc baltimore supports people with developmental disabilities to lead fulfilling lives with a sense of belonging, purpose, and meaningful relationships.

Human Services

Washington Area Community Investment

To increase equity and economic opportunity by investing knowledge, social, and financial capital in low- and moderate-income washington area entrepreneurs.

—

Out & Equal

Social Science

Maryland Center On Economic Policy Inc

The maryland center on economic policy advances innovative policy ideas to foster broad prosperity and help our state be the standard-bearer for responsible public policy.

Social Science

Pathways to Housing Dc

Human Services

Wonders Early Learning Extended Day

—

Worksource Montgomery Inc

Assist the montgomery county wib, in expanding the public workforce development system in the county, through serving and connecting job seekers and businesses.

Community Improvement

Higher Achievement Program Inc

Provide after-school academic enrichment in under-resourced communities of dc, va, and md.

—

First Maryland Disability Trust Inc

Providing trust services to individuals with disabilities of all ages throughout maryland.

Human Services

Virginia Center for Inclusive

VCIC works with schools, businesses, and communities to achieve success through inclusion.

Civil Rights

Abilitypath

Empower people with special needs to achieve their full potential through innovative inclusive programs and community partnerships.

Employment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Guild Inc and the most unlike its peers is University of Maryland Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

1%1/78

the rest of the field

12%

1,167/9,776

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

28 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

26/28

Grantees still filing

21/28

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$3,008,731Youth Development$177,600Education$173,530Human Services$132,025Health$50,237Employment$48,313Philanthropy$26,246

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC30.3× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz · United Way of the National Capital Area · William S Abell Foundation Inc · Adventist Healthcare Inc · Posner-Wallace Foundation · David S Stone Foundation Inc · Sanford and Doris Slavin Foundation Inc · Ronald & Joy Paul Family Foundation Inc · Bender Foundation Inc · Healthcare Initiative Foundation · The Gary and Pennie Abramson Charitable

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation WORKSOURCE MONTGOMERY INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

11get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PATHWAYS TO EXCELLENCE INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.3× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 844638672 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on PATHWAYS TO EXCELLENCE INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 26% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Worksource Montgomery Inc?

Find your warmest path to Worksource Montgomery Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

WORKSOURCE MONTGOMERY INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

28 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Worksource Montgomery Inc?

More from the funding graph

WORKSOURCE MONTGOMERY INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

28 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Worksource Montgomery Inc?

More from the funding graph