· Private foundation
Working Woman's Home Association Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $54k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $337k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FAMILY SUNSHINE CENTER | $46,700 |
| EMBRACE ALABAMA KIDS | $36,700 |
| FRIENDSHIP MISSION | $35,000 |
| MERCY HOUSE | $35,000 |
| MEDICAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES | $30,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE RIVER REGION | $20,000 |
| BRANTWOOD CHILDREN'S HOME | $20,000 |
| MONTGOMERY AREA COUNCIL ON AGING - MEALS ON WHEELS | $20,000 |
| AID TO INMATE MOTHERS | $15,000 |
| AGAPE OF CENTRAL ALABAMA | $15,000 |
| HOPE INSPIRED MINISTRIES | $12,000 |
| ONE PLACE FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER | $12,000 |
| CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES | $10,000 |
| HEART OF ALABAMA FOOD BANK | $10,000 |
| CHILD PROTECT | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $680k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.
30 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FMFRIENDSHIP MISSION INC5× · 2021–2025 · $150k · revenue +82%
- UMUNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME4× · 2022–2025 · $127k · revenue +42%
- MHMERCY HOUSE INC5× · 2021–2025 · $125k · revenue +84%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $28k
- SCSECOND CHANCE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $8k
- COCOMMUNITIES OF TRANSFORMATIONone grant, 2021 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The christian mission centers seeks to meet the mental, physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of all people to whom we minister.
The mission of christian services for children in alabama is to show the love of christ by providing counseling and other related services to children and their families.
Operation of a public charter school in Mobile Alabama.
To evaluate needs, facilitate solutions, and seek resources to end homelessness in the river region.
To serve people, build community, pursue justice.
Provide family and maternity counseling, adoption assistance, coordination of foster homes and therapeutic care assessments of foster children.
To provide temporary shelter, related services and nuturing support to housing insecure families with children in baldwin county.
See schedule othe mission of the agape community development center is to provide safe, affordable, high quality child care for the madison county, ms community. in doing so, we support families in their efforts to reach their goals. the…
Provide advocacy services for abused children in Central Alabama.
Provide Group and Foster care for Homeless Children and Counseling
Christ centered ministry that provides food, rent, utility and medicine support for local individuals who are in need.
Work program for teen challenge candidates, temporary housing, evaluations, gospel witness
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Agape of Central Alabama Inc and the most unlike its peers is Montgomery Step Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRIENDSHIP MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
- Who funds MERCY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds MONTGOMERY AREA COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE RIVER REGION INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Catholic Social Services of Montgomery ↗
- Who funds AGAPE OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds Child Protect Inc ↗
- Who funds ONE PLACE FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds AID TO INMATE MOTHERS INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE INSPIRED MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds HEART OF ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds MONTGOMERY STEP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEW BEGINNINGS EDUCATIONAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds COMMON GROUND MONTGOMERY ↗
- Who funds ALABAMA COALITION AGAINST RAPE INC ↗
- Who funds MONTGOMERY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds VALIANT CROSS ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds THE GROVE MGM ↗
- Who funds SECOND CHANCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES OF TRANSFORMATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Kiwanis Club of Montgomery Foundation Inc · Central Alabama Community Foundation Inc · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Arthur M Britton Foundation Inc · Junior League of Montgomery Inc · Gordy-Mead-Britton Foundation · B Stephen Schloss Foundation · The Hobbs Foundation · John and Joyce Caddell Foundation · The S Adam Schloss Foundation Inc · River Region United Way
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Working Woman's Home Association Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Working Woman's Home Association Inc?
Find your warmest path to Working Woman's Home Association Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.