Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Woodruff Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$471k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0171% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$1.3MHuman Services$491kReligion$316kCommunity Improvement$164kCrime & Legal$115kYouth Development$105kPhilanthropy$100kCivil Rights$85kEducation$61kOther$1.3M
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k21 grants · $421k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE EDUCATIONAL SERVICE CENTER OF$50,000
THE CENTERS FOR FAMILY AND CHILDREN$35,000
POSITIVE EDUCATION PROGRAM$30,000
THRIVE FOR CHANGE$25,000
LUTHERAN METROPOLITAN MINISTRY$25,000
CLEVELAND FOUNDATION$25,000
MENTAL HEALTH & ADDICTION ADVOCACY$25,000
STELLA MARIS$25,000
PREGNANT WITH POSSIBILITIES$25,000
NAMI GREATER CLEVELAND$25,000
THE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION$25,000
NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CARE INC$20,785
SIGNATURE HEALTH INC$20,000
CANOPY$15,000
THE LESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL TRANSGENDE$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $491k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%BENJAMIN ROSE INSTITUTE: $14k → 17%ST VINCENT CHARITY MEDICAL CENTER: $20k → 17%ST VINCENT CHARITY MEDICAL CENTER: $20k → 17%ST VINCENT CHARITY MEDICAL CENTER: $20k → 17%ST VINCENT CHARITY MEDICAL CENTER: $20k → 17%JOSEPHS HOME: $18k → 17%US TOGETHER INC: $17k → 17%ST VINCENT CHARITY MEDICAL CENTER: $15k → 17%JOSEPHS HOME: $15k → 17%JOSEPHS HOME: $13k → 17%MAY DUGAN CENTER: $25k → 17%MAY DUGAN CENTER: $25k → 17%MAY DUGAN CENTER: $25k → 17%MAY DUGAN CENTER: $15k → 17%MAY DUGAN CENTER: $15k → 17%THE CENTERS FOR FAMILY AND CHILDREN: $35k → 17%THE CENTERS FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $25k → 17%THE CENTERS FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $25k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $16k → 17%THE CENTERS FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDR: $10k → 17%YMCA OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $20k → 17%FRONTLINE SERVICES: $20k → 17%FRONTLINE SERVICES: $15k → 17%UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT: $10k → 17%UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT: $8k → 17%CORNERSTONE OF HOPE: $10k → 17%CORNERSTONE OF HOPE: $10k → 17%CORNERSTONE OF HOPE: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.3M · 43 repeat orgs$637k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.

43 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 31 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
26

Total granted

$3.3M
$447k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+37%

Still filing today

74%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $190k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesReligionYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    STELLA MARIS INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $250k · revenue +172%
  • CC
    Cleveland Christian Home Inc
    4× · 2017–2023 · $158k · revenue +108%
  • LM
    LUTHERAN METROPOLITAN MINISTRY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $148k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • MH
    MENTAL HEALTH & ADDICTION ADV COALITION
    one grant, 2019 · $35k
  • CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $26k · revenue +43%
  • ED
    EMERALD DEVELOPMENT & ECONOMIC NETWORKgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +57%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Cincinnati Behavioral Health Services

To ensure people with mental illness, addiction, and related challenges lead healthy and productive lives.

Health
2
Community Support Services Inc

Serves as a safety net for those summit county residents who are most in need of behavioral health services as a result of severe and persistent mental illness the agency proveides comprehensive, high quality, cost-effective treatment,…

Health
3
Clermont Counseling Center

To ensure people with mental illness, addiction, and related challenges lead healthy and productive lives.

Health
4
Child & Adolescent Behavioral Health

We are the premier childrens mental health agency that reduces the suffering experienced by children who have emotional problems related to depression, anxiety, and behavior like adhd. untreated, these problems can lead to failure in…

—
5
Compass Family & Community Services

Compass helps individuals and families build better lives and a stronger community.

Human Services
6
New Horizons Mental Health Services Inc

To provide mental health care to children, adults, and families of the fairfield county area and occasionally to other counties in the state of ohio

Health
7
Cleveland Mediation Center

Our mission is to promote a just and peaceful community by honoring all people, building their capacity to act, and facilitating opportunities for them to engage in conflict constructively. We continue to fulfill our mission by…

Crime & Legal
8
Scioto Paint Valley Mental Health Center

To provide mental health, substance abuse, and integrated care services to residents of ross, pike, pickaway, fayette, and highland counties in ohio.

Health
9
Unison Behavioral Health Group Inc

Unison behavioral health group, inc. is a community mental health agency that provides mental health and addiction services to lucas and wood counties. our mental health outpatient services are offered at many levels of care depending on a…

Health
10
Maumee Valley Guidance Center Inc

To provide behavioral healthcare services for the continual enhancement of the quality of life across the life span, emphasizing treatment, community involvement, and innovative programs.

Health
11
Commquest Services Inc

To provide collaborative care and advocacy for people through three pillars of service: mental health, addiction recovery, and social support.

Human Services
12
Centerpointe Inc

Our mission is to help the people we serve get better, sooner, for longer. centerpointe serves some of the most vulnerable in our communities who have co-occuring mental and physical health diagnoses, and who are experiencing or at risk of…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is OhioGuidestone and the most unlike its peers is Us Together Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%4%<5yr13%10%5–10yr16%6%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr19%25%35–55yr19%40%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%1%<5yr13%6%5–10yr16%6%10–20yr16%11%20–35yr19%30%35–55yr19%45%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/55
the rest of the field
13%
1,298/9,763

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
51/54
Grantees still filing
41/54
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

STELLA MARIS INC — $250,000 · HealthSTELLA MARIS INCCLEVELAND RAPE CRISIS CENTER — $130,000 · HealthCLEVELAND RAPE CRISIS CENTERTHE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $115,000 · HealthTHE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INCMENTAL HEALTH & ADDICTION ADVOCACY COALITION — $115,000 · HealthMENTAL HEALTH & ADDICTION ADVOCACY CO…POSITIVE EDUCATION PROGRAM — $110,000 · HealthPOSITIVE EDUCATION PROGRAMNAMI-GREATER CLEVELAND — $95,000 · HealthNAMI-GREATER CLEVELANDNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CARE INC — $84,895 · HealthNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CARE INCCOMMUNITY ASSESSMENT & TREATMENT SERVICES INC — $80,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY ASSESSMENT & TREATMENT SERV…LIFEACT — $72,500 · HealthLIFEACTRECOVERY RESOURCES — $64,390 · HealthBeech Brook — $47,000 · Health+7 more — $172,500 · Health+7 moreTHE SALVATION ARMY — $185,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHILDREN — $97,500 · OtherACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHILDRENALCOHOL DRUG ADDITIONMENTAL HLTH SVC — $86,460 · OtherALCOHOL DRUG ADDITIONMENTAL HLTH SVCWOMEN'S RECOVERY CENTER — $67,500 · OtherANNAPOLIS COALITION — $53,000 · OtherMENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTION ADVOCACY COA — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherTHE EDUCATIONAL SERVICE CENTER OF — $50,000 · OtherTHE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION — $100,000 · OtherTHE CLEVELAND FOUNDATIONLESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER — $85,000 · OtherLESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY…GREATER CLEVELAND CONGREGATIONS INC — $50,000 · Other+31 more — $623,605 · Other+31 moreNear Westside MultiService Corp — $105,000 · Human ServicesNear Westside…The Centers for Families and Children — $95,000 · Human ServicesThe Centers f…ST VINCENT CHARITY MEDICAL CENTER — $95,000 · Human ServicesST VINCENT CH…JOSEPHS HOME — $46,300 · Human ServicesJOSEPHS HOMEMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES FOR HOMELESS PERSONS INC — $35,000 · Human ServicesMENTAL HEALTH…CORNERSTONE OF HOPE INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesCORNERSTONE O…YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND — $20,000 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT INC — $17,500 · Human ServicesUS TOGETHER INC — $17,000 · Human Services+2 more — $30,000 · Human Services+2 moreCleveland Christian Home Inc — $157,500 · ReligionLUTHERAN METROPOLITAN MINISTRY — $148,000 · Religion+1 more — $10,000 · ReligionTHE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS — $90,000 · Community ImprovementVILLAGE OF HEALING — $74,424 · Community ImprovementJOURNEY CENTER FOR SAFETY AND HEALING — $115,000 · Crime & LegalIDEASTREAM — $95,000 · Youth DevelopmentDAVIDS CHALLENGE INCORPORATED YOUND ACHIEVERS PROGRAM — $10,000 · Youth Development
Health$1,336,285Other$1,498,065Human Services$490,800Religion$315,500Community Improvement$164,424Crime & Legal$115,000Youth Development$105,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSTELLA MARIS INC — $250,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetCleveland Christian Home Inc — $157,500 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetLUTHERAN METROPOLITAN MINISTRY — $148,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCLEVELAND RAPE CRISIS CENTER — $130,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetJOURNEY CENTER FOR SAFETY AND HEALING — $115,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetTHE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $115,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH & ADDICTION ADVOCACY COALITION — $115,000 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetPOSITIVE EDUCATION PROGRAM — $110,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNear Westside MultiService Corp — $105,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHILDREN — $97,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetIDEASTREAM — $95,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetThe Centers for Families and Children — $95,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetST VINCENT CHARITY MEDICAL CENTER — $95,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI-GREATER CLEVELAND — $95,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS — $90,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetLESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER — $85,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CARE INC — $84,895 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY ASSESSMENT & TREATMENT SERVICES INC — $80,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetVILLAGE OF HEALING — $74,424 over 2y, 51% of budgetLIFEACT — $72,500 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetWOMEN'S RECOVERY CENTER — $67,500 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetRECOVERY RESOURCES — $64,390 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND CONGREGATIONS INC — $50,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetBeech Brook — $47,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJOSEPHS HOME — $46,300 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetFAR WEST CENTER — $40,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetOhioGuidestone — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND OHIO — $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES FOR HOMELESS PERSONS INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBIRTHING BEAUTIFUL COMMUNITIES — $35,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCORNERSTONE OF HOPE INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSIGNATURE HEALTH INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $26,280 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMERALD DEVELOPMENT & ECONOMIC NETWORK — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANOPY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER — $25,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetTHRIVE FOR CHANGE — $25,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetURBAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAGNOLIA CLUBHOUSE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNEW DIRECTIONS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNaaleh Cleveland Inc — $17,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT INC — $17,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUS TOGETHER INC — $17,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION — $16,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPEWELL — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBENJAMIN ROSE INSTITUTE — $14,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Living Miracles Peer Empowerment Center — $10,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STELLA MARIS INC ↗
  • Who funds Cleveland Christian Home Inc ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN METROPOLITAN MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND RAPE CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JOURNEY CENTER FOR SAFETY AND HEALING ↗
  • Who funds THE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH & ADDICTION ADVOCACY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds POSITIVE EDUCATION PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds Near Westside MultiService Corp ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds IDEASTREAM ↗
  • Who funds The Centers for Families and Children ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT CHARITY MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NAMI-GREATER CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds LESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT & TREATMENT SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE OF HEALING ↗
  • Who funds LIFEACT ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S RECOVERY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds RECOVERY RESOURCES ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND CONGREGATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Beech Brook ↗
  • Who funds JOSEPHS HOME ↗
  • Who funds FAR WEST CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OhioGuidestone ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND OHIO ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES FOR HOMELESS PERSONS INC ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHING BEAUTIFUL COMMUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE OF HOPE INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland Foundat…The George Gund Found…Mt Sinai Health Care …Higley Fund of the Cl…Community West Founda…The Char and Chuck Fo…United Way of Greater…The Abington Foundati…Jewish Federation of …E S Prentiss Foundati…Ridgecliff FoundationThree Arches Foundati…
The Cleveland FoundationOH74.1× affinity38 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · The George Gund Foundation · Mt Sinai Health Care Foundation · Higley Fund of the Cleveland Foundation · Community West Foundation · The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · United Way of Greater Cleveland · The Abington Foundation · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · E S Prentiss Foundation-Ir · Ridgecliff Foundation · Three Arches Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Woodruff Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • 2ND Act Org Inc — 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
28report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Woodruff Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Woodruff Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines