Skip to content

· Private foundation

Woodhouse Family Foundation Attn John C Woodhouse II

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$541k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$1.4MReligion$1.0MPublic Benefit$177kCivil Rights$130kCrime & Legal$95kArts & Culture$78kCommunity Improvement$64kSocial Science$42kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $154k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $375k
$10,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRESBYTERIAN MO RANCH ASSEMBLY$200,000
WESLAYAN UNIVERSITY$175,000
INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE$26,000
FOUNDATION FOR TEACHING ECONOMICSFUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES$13,500
THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION$12,000
COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE$12,000
ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE$10,000
FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION$10,000
FRIEDMAN FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIONAL CHOICE$10,000
HOOVER INSTITUTE$10,000
ACTON INSTITUTE$10,000
FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN EDUCATION$10,000
THE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE$10,000
CLARE BOOTH LUCE POLICY INSTITUTE$10,000
THE ADMIRAL NIMITZ FOUNDATIONTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF THE PACIFIC WAR$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 55% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE: $26k → 10%MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE: $50k → 12%FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN EDUCATION: $10k → 22%HOOVER INSTITUTE: $10k → 8%FOUNDATION FOR TEACHING ECONOMICSFUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $14k → 16%THE ADMIRAL NIMITZ FOUNDATIONTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF THE PACIFIC WAR: $10k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN MO RANCH ASSEMBLY: $200k → 13%WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION: $14k → 14%AKILAH INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN: $15k → 13%ACTON INSTITUTE: $10k → 11%WESLAYAN UNIVERSITY: $175k → 7%FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $10k → 13%THE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE: $15k → 14%CLARE BOOTH LUCE POLICY INSTITUTE: $10k → 6%ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE: $10k → 29%MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE: $50k → 12%HOOVER INSTITUTE: $9k → 8%PRESBYTERIAN MO RANCH ASSEMBLY: $175k → 13%WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION: $13k → 14%AKILAH INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN: $11k → 13%ACTON INSTITUTE: $9k → 11%WESLAYAN UNIVERSITY: $175k → 7%FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $8k → 13%THE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE: $10k → 14%HOOVER INSTITUTE: $8k → 8%PRESBYTERIAN MO RANCH ASSEMBLY: $150k → 13%WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION: $12k → 14%WESLAYAN UNIVERSITY: $150k → 7%THE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE: $9k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN MO RANCH ASSEMBLY: $150k → 13%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $12k → 14%WESLAYAN UNIVERSITY: $150k → 7%PRESBYTERIAN MO RANCH ASSEMBLY: $150k → 13%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $12k → 14%WESLAYAN UNIVERSITY: $150k → 7%PRESBYTERIAN MO RANCH ASSEMBLY: $100k → 13%COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE: $12k → 14%WESLAYAN UNIVERSITY: $150k → 7%PRESBYTERIAN MO RANCH ASSEMBLY: $100k → 13%WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION: $11k → 14%WESLAYAN UNIVERSITY: $150k → 7%COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE: $11k → 14%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE: $10k → 14%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE: $9k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
MA
IN
PA
CT
CA
KY
VA
MD
DE
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Woodhouse Family Foundation Attn John C Woodhouse II’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Woodhouse Family Foundation Attn John C Woodhouse IIlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 21 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
1

Total granted

$3.0M
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
-2%

Still filing today

86%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCivil RightsPublic BenefitReligionCrime & LegalSocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WU
    WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +55%
  • PM
    PRESBYTERIAN MO-RANCH ASSEMBLY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +35%
  • THE TRUSTEES OF MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $100k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • NT
    NATIONAL TUBEROUS SCLEROSIS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
2
Hillsdale College

Hillsdale college is a private liberal arts college with approximately 1,500 students. founded in 1844, the college remains, in the words of its articles of association, "grateful to god for the inestimable blessings resulting from the…

Education
3
American Law Institute

The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…

Crime & Legal
4
Rodel Institute

The rodel institute is a nonpartisan center for leadership and intellectual growth. rodel helps america's most promising leaders reach their full potential as public servants, deepen their commitment to democracy and the rule of law,…

Philanthropy
5
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
6
The Fund for American Studies

The fund for american studies (tfas) seeks to create a brighter, more prosperous future by preparing young people for leadership and teaching them the ideas of freedom and a free-market economy. founded in 1967, tfas organizes programs for…

—
7
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
8
Washington and Lee University

Mission statement of washington and lee university: washington and lee university provides a liberal arts education that develops students' capacity to think freely, critically, and humanely and to conduct themselves with honor, integrity,…

Education
9
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
10
Council of Independent Colleges

The council of independent colleges is an association of nonprofit independent colleges and universities, state- based councils of independent colleges, and other higher education affiliates, that works to support college and university…

—
11
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
12
Manhattan Institute for Policy Research Inc

The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is National Tuberous Sclerosis Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $1,100,000 · EducationWESLEYAN UNIVERSITYTHE TRUSTEES OF MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE: $100,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGEINTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC: $47,000 · Education+3 more: $65,000 · EducationPRESBYTERIAN MO-RANCH ASSEMBLY: $1,025,000 · ReligionPRESBYTERIAN MO-RANCH ASSEMBLYCOMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE: $63,500 · OtherCOMPETITIVE …HOOVER INSTITUTE: $49,000 · OtherHOOVER INSTI…AKILAH INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN: $48,000 · OtherAKILAH INSTI…THE ADMIRAL NIMITZ FOUNDATIONTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF THE PACIFIC WAR: $39,000 · OtherTHE ADMIRAL …Bill of Rights Institute: $32,000 · OtherBill of Righ…CLARE BOOTHE LUCE CENTER FOR CONSERVATIVE WOMEN: $38,500 · OtherCLARE BOOTHE…FOUNDATION FOR TEACHING ECONOMICS: $32,500 · OtherFOUNDATION F…MEDICAL BENEVOLENCE FOUNDATION: $26,500 · OtherMEDICAL BENE…+2 more: $10,000 · OtherTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $69,000 · Public BenefitTHE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE: $59,000 · Public BenefitActon Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty: $53,500 · Civil RightsFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC: $39,500 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $27,000 · Civil RightsWASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION: $68,000 · Crime & LegalFoundation for Economic Education Inc: $41,500 · Social Science
Education$1,312,000Religion$1,025,000Other$339,000Public Benefit$128,000Civil Rights$120,000Crime & Legal$68,000Social Science$41,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $1,100,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN MO-RANCH ASSEMBLY: $1,025,000 over 7y, 4.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $69,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION: $68,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCOMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE: $63,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE: $59,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetActon Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty: $53,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetINTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC: $47,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFoundation for Economic Education Inc: $41,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetEdChoice Inc: $40,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC: $39,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCLARE BOOTHE LUCE CENTER FOR CONSERVATIVE WOMEN: $38,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR TEACHING ECONOMICS: $32,500 over 6y, 28% of budgetBill of Rights Institute: $32,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $27,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL BENEVOLENCE FOUNDATION: $26,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PATRIOT FOUNDATION TRUST: $15,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetALICE LLOYD COLLEGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL TUBEROUS SCLEROSIS ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN MO-RANCH ASSEMBLY ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty ↗
  • Who funds INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for Economic Education Inc ↗
  • Who funds EdChoice Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC ↗
  • Who funds CLARE BOOTHE LUCE CENTER FOR CONSERVATIVE WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR TEACHING ECONOMICS ↗
  • Who funds Bill of Rights Institute ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL BENEVOLENCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE PATRIOT FOUNDATION TRUST ↗
  • Who funds ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL TUBEROUS SCLEROSIS ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH10.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Woodhouse Family Foundation Attn John C Woodhouse II funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Woodhouse Family Foundation Attn John C Woodhouse II. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Wesleyan University: 1% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Mount Holyoke College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Woodhouse Family Foundation Attn John C Woodhouse II’s filings →

More from the funding graph