Skip to content

· Private foundation

Woodard Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$71k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$371kInternational$80kHousing & Shelter$30kFood & Nutrition$25kCivil Rights$15kHuman Services$8kEnvironment$7kCrime & Legal$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIRTH SISTERS OF CHARLOTTESVILLE$5,000
ALBEMARLE HOUSING IN PLACE (AHIP)$5,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,000
INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS$5,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN$5,000
REPORTERS WITHOUT BORDERS$5,000
RON BROWN SCHOLAR PROGRAM$5,000
LOAVES & FISHES FOOD PANTRY INC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ANERA$5,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$5,000
CHILD HEALTH PARTNERSHIP$3,000
SHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY$3,000
IVY CREEK NATURAL AREA & HISTORIC V$2,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY: $5k → 8%NEW HILL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5k → 8%SHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Woodard Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 88% of the giving stays in VA; by stated purpose, 86%.

Woodard Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$528k · 16 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
6

Total granted

$528k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+336%

Still filing today

69%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalFood & NutritionHuman ServicesCivil RightsHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $28k · revenue +38%
  • LF
    LOAVES & FISHES FOOD PANTRY INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +32%
  • IM
    INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS
    3× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • BG
    BOTANICAL GARDEN OF PIEDMONT
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • NH
    NEW HILL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +336%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Strategic Global Response

Strategic Global Response effectively and efficiently delivers life-saving care to people affected by humanitarian crises, in the most challenging situations on earth

Human Services
2
MedGlobal Inc

MedGlobal is a humanitarian non-governmental organization working to serve vulnerable communities around the world by providing innovative, free, and sustainable healthcare. Our health services support refugees, displaced persons, and…

Health
3
United States Association for Unhcr

USA for UNHCR protects and supports refugees by mobilizing resources, elevating awareness, and driving action through a network of engaged supporters.

International
4
Rise Against Hunger Inc

Rise against hunger, inc. is an international hunger relief non-profit organization that is driven by a vision of a world without hunger and a mission to end hunger in our lifetime. rise against hunger distributes food and other…

International
5
World Renew

Compelled by a deep passion for justice and mercy, World Renew joins communities around the world to renew hope, reconcile lives, and restore creation with programs focused on disaster response, community health, economic opportunity, food…

—
6
Rise Up Humanity

To provide humanitarian aid relief and support to refugees and individuals displaced by war conflict and natural disasters worldwide. In 2025 we were a fiscal sponsor for multiple projects helping refugees residing in Egypt.

International
7
Refugee Protection International Inc

Rpi's mission is to partner with local non-gov organizations and others to strengthen protection and self-reliance among refugees and internally displaced persons near conflict zones.

International
8
Circle of Health International

COHIs mission is to work with women and their communities in times of crisis and disaster to ensure access to quality reproductive, maternal and newborn care. See Sch O for full mission.

—
9
Mali Health Organizing Project Inc

Mali Health improves maternal and child health by supporting women, communities, and the community health system to develop local solutions that ensure every mother and child has access to quality primary care. We aim to end preventable…

Community Improvement
10
International Service for Human Rights Inc

The organization's primary mission is supporting human rights defenders and strengthening human rights systems.

Civil Rights
11
Sanitation and Health Rights in India

SHRI fights alongside communities to end open defecation as a key step in an ongoing struggle for health equity and soical and economic justice.

International
12
Aid for Starving Children

Aid For Starving Children provides assistance around the world to children and their families by providing food, shelter, clean water, financial assistance, education, and emergency relief to victims of famine, natural disasters, and war.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Children Federation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Birth Sisters of Charlottesville. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UVA SCHOOL OF NURSING ANNUAL FUND: $347,212 · OtherUVA SCHOOL OF NURSING ANNUAL FUNDALBEMARLE HOUSING IN PLACE (AHIP): $20,000 · Other+11 more: $54,650 · Other+11 moreInternational Rescue Committee INC: $27,500 · InternationalInternational …INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $15,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL …Save The Children Federation Inc: $15,000 · InternationalSave The Child…AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID: $10,000 · InternationalAMERICAN NEAR …+1 more: $2,000 · InternationalLOAVES & FISHES FOOD PANTRY INC: $20,000 · Food & NutritionTHE SOCIETY OF ST ANDREW INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionReporters Without Borders Inc: $15,000 · Civil RightsSHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesNEW HILL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesBirth Sisters of Charlottesville: $10,000 · HealthRon Brown Scholar Fund: $5,000 · Education
Other$421,862International$69,500Food & Nutrition$25,000Civil Rights$15,000Human Services$13,000Health$10,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $27,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLOAVES & FISHES FOOD PANTRY INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetReporters Without Borders Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 34% of budgetSHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHILD HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRon Brown Scholar Fund: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ST ANDREW INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HILL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSEXUAL ASSAULT RESOURCE AGENCY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charlottesville Area Community FoundationVA19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charlottesville Area Community Foundation · Perry Foundation Inc · Manning Family Foundation · The J & E Berkley Foundation · Sentara Health · S&P Global Foundation Fka the McGraw-Hill Research Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Woodard Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Woodard Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Woodard Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Woodard Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Woodard Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph